TO THE QUESTION ON THE NECESSITY OF UNIFICATION OF TERMINOLOGY OF EU AND RUSSIA IN THE SPHERE OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LAW
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published:
Dec 2, 2021
Abstract
The article provides evidence of considerable terminology discrepancies between Russia and the EU on a number of issues of private and public law that interfere with the movement of capital and international cooperation on global problems of modern age. From this perspective, the author considers it necessary to form a common legal area across the EU and Russia; at that the legal proceedings and the relating terminology in the EU an Russian Federation do not have to be the same. The unification in question should be carried out taking into account the specifics of national legal systems while keeping intact statutory concepts that meet the imperatives of time.
How to Cite
Anisimov, A. (2021). TO THE QUESTION ON THE NECESSITY OF UNIFICATION OF TERMINOLOGY OF EU AND RUSSIA IN THE SPHERE OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LAW. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (4), 33-43. Retrieved from http://baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/bjlss/article/view/1379
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
unification; property rights; superficies; eco-terrorism; business
References
1. Why the railway track in Russia is wider (accessed 29.12.2017) // https://www.kakprosto.ru/kak-839506-pochemu-zheleznodorozhnaya-koleya-v-rossii-shire
2. See, for example: decision of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of December 13, 2001 № 16-P “On business about check of constitutionality of part two article 16 of the law of the city of Moscow “About bases of paid land tenure in Moscow” in connection with the complaint of citizen V. T. Blizinski” // Collected legislation of the Russian Federation. 2001. No. 52 (Part II). St. 5014.
3. Pevnitskii S.G. Actual problems of property rights: the Institute of the right of permanent (perpetual) use of land following the adoption of the Land code // Notary. 2004. No. 1. P. 23-25.
4. Grishaev S.P. Right of lifetime inheritable possession // Reference legal system “Consultant Plus”, accessed 29.11.2017.
5. Pandakov K.G., Chernomorets A.E. Land and Agrarian reform: legislation, theory and practice. 3rd edition. Saratov: “Nauchnaya kniga”, 2004. 480 p.
6. Pokrovsky I.A. Main problems of civil law. Petrograd, 1917. M.: Statut, 2003. 353 p.
7. Kosolapov O.A. Land as an object of property law: abstract of the thesis of candidate of legal sciences. M., 2008. 18 p.
8. Jabreev M.V. Public education and their bodies: civil status and participation in civil legal relationship // Civil notes. Interuniversity collection of scientific works. M., 2001. P. 177-219.
9. Golubtsov V. G. Russia’s role in property relations regulated by civil legislation: abstract of the thesis of doctor of legal sciences. M., 2008. 55 p.
10. The land code of the Kyrgyz Republic from April 30, 1999 (as amended from 25.07.2017) // http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30241294#pos=84;-815 (accessed 1.12.2017).
11. The concept of development of legislation on property law. M., 2009. 143 p.
12. Model rules of European private law / per. from English / Scientific editor N. Yu. Rasskazova. M., 2013. 992 p.
13. See § 17 of the Law of the Slovak Republic of 25 June 2002 No. 543/2002 Z. z. “On the protection of nature and landscape” // https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2002/543/20171101.html#paragraf-19 (accessed 30.11.2017)
14. Fundamentals of the theory of national security: textbook / ed. ed. by E.A. Matvienko. Volgograd: Volgograd Academy of the interior Ministry of Russia, 2012. 320 p.
15. Liddick D. Eco-Terrorism: Radical Environmental and Animal Liberation Movements. Westport, Connecticut, Praeger Publishers, 2006. 300 p.
16. McCoy K. E. Subverting justice: an indictment of the animal enterprise terrorism act // Animal Law. 2007. Vol. 14. P. 53-70.
2. See, for example: decision of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of December 13, 2001 № 16-P “On business about check of constitutionality of part two article 16 of the law of the city of Moscow “About bases of paid land tenure in Moscow” in connection with the complaint of citizen V. T. Blizinski” // Collected legislation of the Russian Federation. 2001. No. 52 (Part II). St. 5014.
3. Pevnitskii S.G. Actual problems of property rights: the Institute of the right of permanent (perpetual) use of land following the adoption of the Land code // Notary. 2004. No. 1. P. 23-25.
4. Grishaev S.P. Right of lifetime inheritable possession // Reference legal system “Consultant Plus”, accessed 29.11.2017.
5. Pandakov K.G., Chernomorets A.E. Land and Agrarian reform: legislation, theory and practice. 3rd edition. Saratov: “Nauchnaya kniga”, 2004. 480 p.
6. Pokrovsky I.A. Main problems of civil law. Petrograd, 1917. M.: Statut, 2003. 353 p.
7. Kosolapov O.A. Land as an object of property law: abstract of the thesis of candidate of legal sciences. M., 2008. 18 p.
8. Jabreev M.V. Public education and their bodies: civil status and participation in civil legal relationship // Civil notes. Interuniversity collection of scientific works. M., 2001. P. 177-219.
9. Golubtsov V. G. Russia’s role in property relations regulated by civil legislation: abstract of the thesis of doctor of legal sciences. M., 2008. 55 p.
10. The land code of the Kyrgyz Republic from April 30, 1999 (as amended from 25.07.2017) // http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30241294#pos=84;-815 (accessed 1.12.2017).
11. The concept of development of legislation on property law. M., 2009. 143 p.
12. Model rules of European private law / per. from English / Scientific editor N. Yu. Rasskazova. M., 2013. 992 p.
13. See § 17 of the Law of the Slovak Republic of 25 June 2002 No. 543/2002 Z. z. “On the protection of nature and landscape” // https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2002/543/20171101.html#paragraf-19 (accessed 30.11.2017)
14. Fundamentals of the theory of national security: textbook / ed. ed. by E.A. Matvienko. Volgograd: Volgograd Academy of the interior Ministry of Russia, 2012. 320 p.
15. Liddick D. Eco-Terrorism: Radical Environmental and Animal Liberation Movements. Westport, Connecticut, Praeger Publishers, 2006. 300 p.
16. McCoy K. E. Subverting justice: an indictment of the animal enterprise terrorism act // Animal Law. 2007. Vol. 14. P. 53-70.