JOINT WILL RECOGNITION AS A SUCCESSION CONTRACT: RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS’ STATUS ISSUES

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Oct 26, 2022

  Edvard Pilipson

Abstract

Joint wills as a contractual succession institution exists as a legal form, which is characterized by an unstable legal nature. Applicable legal regulation, depending on concrete factual composition, can convert joint wills into a contract of succession. With this transformation, principal categories for legal regulation will be changed. This transformation includes the norms that determine the status of rights and obligations, activity and retroactivity of the norms that determine the essential components of both joint wills and succession contract. Questions will undoubtedly arise in competent law determining to ensure convertation. The convertation process as a legal transaction of an independent nature causes substantial conflicts between the rules governing the right of succession under joint will and the rules governing succession under contract. The reason for this phenomenon is the detipization of conflict factors. Conflict factors, named with term detipization exist as a mixture of material norms that occurs as a result of a meaningful conflict without due legal basis or appropriate legal result. In the situation of the possible recognition of joint wills as a concluded succession contract, conflict factors detipization will cause a conflict of qualifications in the situation of applying identical legal categories related to succession under joint wills norms and succession law norms, which secure succession under contract.

How to Cite

Pilipson, E. (2022). JOINT WILL RECOGNITION AS A SUCCESSION CONTRACT: RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS’ STATUS ISSUES. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (2), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2022-2-25
Article views: 80 | PDF Downloads: 99

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

applicable law, contractual succession, future inheritance, joint wills, recognition factors, succession contract.

References
1. Grazhdanskiy Zakon Latviyskoy Respubliki. Razdel vtoroy. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Prinyat 28 yanvarya 1937 goda. Vstupil v silu 1 sentyabrya 1992 goda. Opublikovan: Ziņotājs, 1992, Nr. 29/30/31. S izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami. [Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia. Section two. Inheritance law. Adopted January 28, 1937. Entered into force on September 1, 1992. Published: Ziņotājs, 1992, Nr.29/30/31. With changes and additions].
2. Grazhdanskiy Zakon Latviyskoy Respubliki. Razdel tretiy. Veshchnoe pravo. Prinyat 28 yanvarya 1937 goda. Vstupil v silu 1 sentyabrya 1992 goda. Opublikovan: Valdības Vēstnesis, 44, 24.02.1937. S izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami. [Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia. Section three. Property law. Adopted January 28, 1937. Entered into force on September 1, 1992. Published: Valdības Vēstnesis, 44, 24.02.1937. With changes and additions].
3. Grazhdanskiy Zakon Latviyskoy Respubliki. Razdel chetvertyy. Obyazatel'stvennoe pravo. Prinyat 28 yanvarya 1937 goda. Vstupil v silu 1 marta 1992 goda. Opublikovan: Valdības Vēstnesis, 46, 26.02.1937. C izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami. [Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia. Section four. Obligation law. Adopted January 28, 1937. Entered into force on March 1, 1992. Published: Valdības Vestnesis, 46, 02/26/1937. With changes and additions].
4. Germanskoe Grazhdanskoe Ulozhenie. Prinyat 18 avgusta 1896. Vstupil v silu 1 yanvarya 1900. Opublikovan: RGBl. S. 195. S izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami. [German Civil Code. Adopted August 18, 1896. Entered into force January 1, 1900. Published: RGBl. S. 195. With changes and additions].
5. Grazhdanskiy Kodeks Shveytsarii. Prinyat 28 maya 1904 goda. Vstupil v silu 10 dekabrya 1907 goda. Opublikovan: BBl, 1904 IV 1, 1907 VI 367. S izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami. [Swiss Civil Code. Adopted May 28, 1904. Entered into force on December 10, 1907. Published: BBl, 1904 IV 1, 1907 VI 367. With changes and additions].
6. Vlasenko V.A. (2016) Razumnost' i opredelennost' v pravovom regulirovanii: monografiya [Reasonableness and certainty in legal regulation: monograph]. Moscow: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii: INFRA-M.
7. Berman, Harold J. (1988) Po napravlenyju k yntegratyvnoj jurysprudencyy: Polytyka, Moral', Ystoryja [Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: Politics, Morality, History.] 76 (4) California Law Review: 779-801.