UKRAINIAN DIACHRONIC SOCIOLINGUISTICS: THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE IN EASTERN HALYCHYNA IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE XIX CENTURY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
One of the urgent problems of modern Ukrainian diachronic sociolinguistics is highlighted: consideration of the language issue in the Halychyna Seim within the linguistic situation that developed in a separate administrative-territorial union: it is about the time-space of the Austro-Hungarian Empire of the second half of the 19th century. It has been proven that the language policy on the territory of Eastern Halychyna was decided ambiguously, since two nations, the Ukrainians and the Polish, lived on this territory, each of which used their native language. It is noted that the central government of the Austro-Hungarian Empire recognized the independent status of the Ukrainian people and their language and guaranteed Ukrainians the right to develop their national language, representatives of the Polish nationality were against this and tried to displace the Ukrainian language from all spheres of public life of Ukrainian Halychinians. It was noted that, having obtained a majority in the Halychyna Seim, Polish deputies proposed draft laws that limited the status of the Ukrainian language on the territory of Eastern Halychyna.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
2. Bulakhovskyi, L.A. Etymolohichni vyznachennia natsionalnosti. (Etymological definitions of nationality.) Bulakhovskyi L.A. Vybrani pratsi v piaty tomakh. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1977. T. 1. P. 274–277. (in Ukrainian).
3. Bulakhovskyi L.A. Literaturna mova v Zakhidnii Ukraini. (Literary language in Western Ukraine.) Bulakhovskyi L.A. Vybrani pratsi v piaty tomakh. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1977. T. 2. P. 33–35. (in Ukrainian).
4. Kosmeda T. Retceptciia statusa ukrainskogo iazyka v rossiiskom iazykoznanii: mif i realnost. (Reception of the status of the Ukrainian language in Russian linguistics: myth and reality.) Slavia Centralis. 2020. № 1. P. 126–135. (in Russian).
5. Krimskii, A.Iu. Ukrainskaia grammatika. (Ukrainian grammar.) Moskva, 1907–1908. T. 1–2. Vol. 1. (in Russian).
6. Matsiuk, H. Do vytokiv sotsiolinhvistyky: sotsiolohichnyi napriam u movoznavstvi. (To the origins of sociolinguistics: a sociological trend in linguistics.) Lviv: Publisher center of Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 2006. Vol. 1. P. 322–331) (in Ukrainian).
7. Matsiuk, H. Prykladna sotsiolinhvistyka. Pytannia movnoi polityky. (Applied sociolinguistics. The issue of language policy.) Lviv: Publisher center of Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 2009. Vol. 2. P. 135–137. (in Ukrainian).
8. Sokil, B. Movnyi zakon dlia narodnykh ta serednikh shkil v Halychyni 1867 roku ta dyskusii navkolo noho. (The language law for folk and secondary schools in Galicia in 1867 and the discussions surrounding it.) Naukovi zapysky. Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Hnatiuka Seriia «Movoznavstvo». Ternopil, 2016. P. 101–109) (in Ukrainian).
9. Sokil, B. Ukrainska mova v halytskykh narodnykh shkolakh za chasiv Avstro-Uhorskoi monarkhii. (Ukrainian language in Galician folk schools during the Austro-Hungarian monarchy.) Linhvistychni doslidzhennia: zb. nauk. pr. Kharkiv, 2016. Vol. 42. P. 189–197. (in Ukrainian).
10. Shevelov, Yu. Vnesok Halychyny u formuvannia ukrainskoi literaturnoi movy. (Halychyna's contribution to the formation of the Ukrainian literary language.) Lviv-Niu-York: Naukove tovarystvo imeni Shevchenka, 1996. 192 p. (in Ukrainian).
11. Sherekh Yu. Halychyna u formuvanni ukrainskoi literaturnoi movy. (Halychyna in the formation of the Ukrainian literary language) Miunkhen: Ukrainskyi vilnyi universytet, 1949. 93 p. (in Ukrainian).