REVIVAL OF UKRAINIAN REGIONS: SCIENCE, BUSINESS, MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE. THE EXPERIENCE OF SOUTH KOREA
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article explores the issues of revival of Ukrainian regions through the synergy of three key elements – science, business and municipal governance. The experience of South Korea is taken as a basis, in particular, the creation and development of Innopolis Deadeok. The methods of analysis and synthesis are used in the study. On the basis of the study relevant recommendations are provided for local authorities, businesses and universities on maintaining the necessary responsibilities and expected steps to create technoparks in Ukraine in which the entire cycle of innovation activity should be carried out – from the emergence and development of an idea to the release of finished knowledge-based products. Prospects for further research consist in the necessity to legislate the powers of local governments in the field of promoting the innovation activities of technoparks.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
technopark, science, business, municipal governance, innovation, network clustering, economics, regional innovation cluster
2. Claire Nauwelaers, Alexander Kleibrink, Katerina Stancova. (2014). The Role of Science Parks in Smart Specialisation Strategies. Technical Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Retrieved from: https://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/w/the-role-of-science-parks-insmart-specialisation-strategies [in English]
3. Definitions. International Association of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation. Retrieved from: https://www.iasp.ws/our-industry/definitions [in English]
4. Deog-Seong Oh and Insup Yeom. (2012). Daedeok Innopolis in Korea: From Science Park to Innovation Cluster. Retrieved from: http://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201235540449725.pdf [in English]
5. Establishing Science and Technology Parks: A Reference Guidebook for Policymakers in Asia and the Pacific. Publication by the Trade, Investment and Innovation Division of ESCAP. 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Guidebook_Final_0.pdf [in English]
6. Łobejko Stanislaw, Sosnowska Alicja. (2015). Management models of a science and technology parks: foreign experiences and recommendations for Poland. Retrieved from: http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.hdl_11320_4438 [in English]
7. Korea Innovation Foundation. Information. Retrieved from: https://www.innopolis.or.kr/board?menuId=MENU01044&siteId=null [in English]
8. Polozhennya pro poryadok stvorennya i funktsionuvannya tekhnoparkiv ta innovatsiynykh struktur inshykh typiv: postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny vid 22 travnya 1996 r. №549. [Provision on the procedure of the creation and functioning of technoparks and innovative structures of other types: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated May 22, 1996 No. 549]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/549-96-%D0%BF [in Ukrainian]
9. Pro industrialʹni parky: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 21.06.2012 r. № 5018-VI. [On industrial parks: Law of Ukraine dated June 21, 2012 No. 5018-VI]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5018-17#Text [in Ukrainian]
10. Pro spetsialʹnyy rezhym innovatsiynoyi diyalʹnosti tekhnolohichnykh parkiv: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 16 lypnya 1999 r. № 991-XIV. [On the special regime of innovative activity of technology parks: Law of Ukraine dated July 16, 1999 No. 991-XIV]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/991-14 [in Ukrainian]