CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR SMUGGLING IN UKRAINE: SOME ISSUES OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article highlights certain problematic aspects related to the legal assessment of certain features of crimes provided for in Articles 201, 201-1, 305 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Attention has been drawn to the high level of scientific study of this issue. The content of the social danger of smuggling has been analyzed; the negative impact of the researched crimes on the relations of the market economy in Ukraine has been shown. The features of the object and the subject of the respective encroachments have also been clarified, and the special legal status of certain objects moving across the customs border of Ukraine has been emphasized. Attention has been also focused on the importance of taking into account the blanket method of describing dispositions of “contraband” prohibitions. It has been emphasized on the importance of taking into account the provisions of the Customs Code of Ukraine, as well as by-laws, which detail the procedure for moving certain items across the customs border of Ukraine, when qualifying the crimes investigated in the article. Finally, the controversy in criminal law science and the inconsistency of judicial practice in determining the moment of the end of smuggling have been demonstrated.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
contraband, object, crime, customs border, public danger, criminal liability, Criminal Code
2. Protsiuk O. (2006) Kryminalna vidpovidalnist za kontrabandu [Criminal liability for contraband]. (PhD Thesis), Kyiv. 255 p.
3. Kravchenko O. (2010) Kryminalno-pravova kharakterystyka kontrabandy (st. 201 KK Ukrainy) [Criminal law characteristics of smuggling (Art. 201 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine)]. (PhD Thesis), Kyiv. 203 p.
4. Zelenskyi, kontrabanda i “boiova sokyra” RNBO (2021) [Zelensky, contraband and “war axe” of CNSD]. Retrieved from: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/zelenskyi-kontrabanda-i-boiova-sokyra-rnbo/31188315.html (accessed 22 January 2023).
5. Dubrovskyi V., Cherkashyn V., Hetman O. (2020) Porivnialnyi analiz fiskalnoho efektu vid zastosuvannia instrumentiv ukhylennia/unyknennia opodatkuvannia v Ukraini: novi vyklyky [Comparative analysis of the fiscal effect of the use of tax evasion/avoidance tools in Ukraine: new challenges]. Kyiv. Retrieved from: http://www.visnuk.com.ua/uploads/media/file/2020/10/15/511abe042e29b50d054719df87b29acff11922c8.pdf (accessed 22 January 2023).
6. Tymoshenko A. (2021) Protydiia kontrabandi u zabezpechenni ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstv [Counteraction to smuggling in ensuring economic security of enterprises]. (PhD Thesis), Kyiv. 231 p.
7. Orlovska N. (2018) Zarubizhnyi dosvid zapobihannia kontrabandi (na prykladi Kytaiu). Aktualni problemy kryminalnoho prava, protsesu, kryminalistyky ta operatyvno-rozshukovoi diialnosti: tezy II Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (Khmelnytskyi, 2 bereznia 2018 roku) [Foreign experience in preventing smuggling (using the example of China). Actual problems of criminal law, process, criminology and investigative activity: theses of the II all-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference (Khmelnytskyi, March 2, 2018).]. Khmelnytskyi: Vyd-vo NADPSU. pp. 78–81.
9. Melnyk M. I., Havronyuk M. I. (ed.) (2018) Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [Scientific and practical commentary on the Criminal Code of Ukraine]. Kyiv : VD “Dakor”. 1368 p.
10. Vyrok Hlybotskoho raionnoho sudu Chernivetskoi oblasti vid 27.03.2018 r. Sprava № 715/377/18 [Verdict of the Hlybotsky District Court of the Chernivtsi Region dated March 27, 2018. Case No. 715/377/18]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72989635 (accessed 22 January 2023).
11. Dudorov O., Movchan R. (2021) Kryminalno-pravova zaborona shchodo kontrabandy derevyny: suchasnyi stan i perspektyvy [Criminal law ban on timber smuggling: current state and prospects]. Legal scientific electronic journal. no. 2, pp. 142–148. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2021-2/34
12. Kamenskyi D.V. (2021) Do pytannia pro blanketnyi sposib konstruiuvannia kryminalno-pravovykh zaboron (na prykladi norm rozdilu VII Osoblyvoi chastyny KK Ukrainy) [To the question of the blanket method of constructing criminal prohibitions (on the example of the norms of Chapter VII of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine)]. Yurydychna Ukraina. no. 1, pp. 20–27. doi: 10.37749/2308-9636-2021-1(217)-3
13. Kamenskyi D.V. (2018) Pro neobkhidnist rekryminalizatsii “tovarnoi” kontrabandy (porivnialno-pravovyi aspekt). Suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku mytnykh pravovidnosyn v Ukraini: kolektyvna monohrafiia / za zah. red. D.V. Pryimachenka [On the necessity of recriminalization of “commodity” smuggling (comparative legal aspect). The current state and prospects for the development of customs legal relations in Ukraine: a collective monograph / ed. D.V. Pryimachenko]. Dnipro : “Helvetyka”, 2018. pp. 237–255 (in Ukrainian).
14. Dudorov O., Movchan R. (2021) Pro perspektyvy rekryminalizatsii kontrabandy tovariv (notatky na poliakh prezydentskoho zakonoproiektu) [About the prospects of recriminalization of smuggling of goods (notes in the margins of the presidential bill)]. Yurydychnyi visnyk Ukrainy. July 30 – August 5. № 30.
15. Postanova Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 09 kvitnia 2020 r. Sprava № 727/6578/17 [Ruling of the Criminal Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court dated April 9, 2020. Case No. 727/6578/17.]. Retrieved from: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/88749345 (accessed 22 January 2023).
16. Postanova Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 9 kvitnia 2019 r. u spravi № 755/23519/14-k [Resolution of the Criminal Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court dated April 9, 2019 in case No. 755/23519/14-k.]. Retrieved from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81360693 (accessed 22 January 2023).