GENERAL ISSUES OF CLIL APPROACH IN TEACHING BA STUDENTS AT HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Apr 5, 2023

Abstract

The article is devoted to CLIL (Subject and Language Integrated Learning) describes teaching methods, where subjects are taught in foreign languages. CLIL has two aims: the study of the subject through a foreign language and foreign language through the subject. Most common today is the following definition: didactic methodology, which allows to form students ' linguistic and communicative competences in a second language in the same educational context in which there are formation and development of general learning knowledge and skills. The paper aims to show general issues of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) approach in teaching BA students at higher educational institutions. Some issues of professional communication in the domain of education are considered. The correlation of students’ language and vocational skills development is examined. The experience of teaching students at the Philological Faculty is focused on.

How to Cite

Shcherbakova, O., & Nikiforchuk, S. (2023). GENERAL ISSUES OF CLIL APPROACH IN TEACHING BA STUDENTS AT HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (1), 112-118. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2023-1-15
Article views: 126 | PDF Downloads: 140

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

content and language integrated learning (CLIL), vocational training, speaking skills, speaking activity, levels of foreign language acquisition, communicative competence

References
1. Atabekova A.A., Belenkova N.M. (2013) Adaptatsiya studentov k mul'tikul'turnoy obrazovatel'noysrede VUZa [Adaptation of students to the multicultural educational environment of the university]. Saarbrücken, Deutschland, Lambert Academic Publishing. (in Russian).
2. Belenkova N. (2012) E-learning and Teaching English as a Foreign Language at University. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Educational Alternatives, vol. 10, part 2, pp. 42–49. URL: http://www.scientific-publications.net/download/educational-alternatives-2012-2.pdf (in English).
3. Commission оf The European Communities Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity (2004–2006): An Action Plan 2004–2006. Brussel, 2003 (in English).
4. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (2004): Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge (in English).
5. Coyle, D., Hood, P., Marsh, D., (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in English).
6. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: from practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204 (in English).
7. Druzhinina M. V. (2008) Ponyatiye i printsipy formirovaniya yazykovoy obrazovatel'noy politiki universiteta. Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena [The concept and principles of the formation of the language educational policy of the university]. no. 52, pp. 60–70 (in Russian).
8. Harmer J. (2001) The Practice of English Language. 3rd Edition. London (in English).