THE 4X4 MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY AND JUSTIFICATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE OPTION

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Oct 11, 2023

Abstract

Abstract. Purpose: to reasonably form an interdisciplinary model of organizational culture that will take into account a number of requirements and purposefully focus on the possibility of practical use. Methodology: the modeling method was applied to fill with the content the hypothetical graphic model of organizational culture through the analysis of the interdisciplinary interpretation of the organization and the synthesis of the systemic and logical structure. Findings: the model is hypothetical and after appropriate empirical and static studies with the following corrections, a conclusion can be made about the possibility and expediency of its application in practice. Originality: an interdisciplinary approach using a systematic modeling method is the latest of scientific attempts to substantiate graphically organizational culture as a scientific concept and a phenomenon important for practical application.

How to Cite

Kutsyi, O. (2023). THE 4X4 MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY AND JUSTIFICATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE OPTION. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (3), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2023-3-17
Article views: 81 | PDF Downloads: 72

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

organizational culture, interdisciplinary systemic approach, hypothetical graphic model.

References
1. Adizes I. (2004). Managing Corporate Lifecycles: Complete Edition. Adizes Institute Publications. 460 p.
2. Dauber, D., Fink, G. Yolles, M. (2010). A Generic Theory of Organizational Culture. Southern Management Association Meeting. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1744040
3. Dauber, D., Fink, G., & Yolles, M. (2012). A Configuration Model of Organizational Culture. SAGE Open, 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012441482
4. De Geus A. (2004). The Living Company. Growth, Learning and Longevity in Business. https://www.amazon.com/Living-Company-Learning-Longevity-Business/dp/1857881850
5. Fried E. I. (2020). Theories and Models: What They Are, What They Are for, and What They Are About. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory. 31 (4). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1854011
6. Hatch, M. J. (1993). The dynamics of organizational culture. The Academy of Management Review. 18 (4). 657–693. https://doi.org/10.2307/258594
7. Hatch, M. J., Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/IAS/ PDF/7-v3_1_18.pdf
8. Isac N., Dobrin C., Raphalalani L. P., Sonko M. (2021). Does organizational culture influence job satisfaction? A comparative analysis of two multinational companies. Review of International Comparative Management. 22 (2). DOI: 10.24818/RMCI.2021.2.138
9. Konovalov O. (2016). Organisational Anatomy. A manager’s guide to a healthy organization. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-4438-8885-1
10. Krzyworzeka P. (2012). Kultura organizacyjna – ślepa uliczka teorii organizacji. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe. 1. 72–81. https://www.academia.edu/3035633/ Kultura_organizacyjna_%C5%9Blepa_uliczka_teorii_organizacji
11. Lehman D. W. (2017). Organizational Cultural Theory and Research Administration Knowledge Management. Society of Research Administrators international. The Journal of Research Administration. 2 (48). 52–66. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1161988
12. Merlo T.R. (2017). Knowledge management technology: human computer interaction & cultural perspective on pattern of retrieval, organization, use, and sharing of information and knowledge. Knowledge and Performance Management. 1(1). 46–54. DOI: 10.21511/kpm.01(1).2017.05
13. Meyer Ch., Davis S. (2007). It's Alive: The Coming Convergence of Information, Biology, and Business. M. Dobraia knyha. https://www.management.com.ua/books/view-books.php?id=46
14. Michael T. Lee, Robyn L. Raschke. (2016). Understanding employee motivation and organizational performance: Arguments for a set-theoretic approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 1(3). 162–169. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X16000068
15. Monastyrskyi H.L. (2019). Teoriia orhanizatsii: pidruchnyk. 2-e vydannia, dopovnene y pereroblene. Ternopil. Krok. http://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/bitstream/316497/37776/1/Teoriia%20orhanizatsii%20 2019.pdf
16. Moon H., Quigley N. R., Marr J. Carson. (2012). How interpersonal motives explain the influence of organizational culture on organizational productivity, creativity, and adaptation: The ambidextrous interpersonal motives (AIM) model of organizational culture. Organizational Psychology Review. 2(2). 109–128. DOI: 10.1177/2041386611433085
17. Menidin N. D. (2014). Morgan’s Images of Organizations Analysis. International journal of innovative research & development. Vol. 3. Issue 13. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/277477383_Morgan%27s_Images_of_Organizations_Analysis
18. Munch, Richard, and Neil J. Smelser. (1993). Theory of Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft8q2nb667/
19. Nadeiko, M. M. (2019), “The enterprise system corporate culture theoretical foundations”, Efektyvna ekonomika, [Online], vol. 11, available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=7449 (Accessed 15 Jul 2023). DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2019.11.178
20. Petriglieri, G. (2020). F**k Science!? An Invitation to Humanize Organization Theory. Organization Theory, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719897663
21. Schein E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership, 4th Edition. Jossey-Bass. https://ia800809.us.archive.org/14/items/EdgarHScheinOrganizationalCultureAndLeadership/ Edgar_H_Schein_Organizational_culture_and_leadership.pdf
22. Steffens, N. K., Munt, K. A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2021). Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(1), 35–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620962569
23. Zeidan S., Itani N. (2020). Cultivating Employee Engagement in Organizations: Development of a Conceptual Framework. Central European Management Journal. 28 (1). 99–118. DOI: 10.7206/ cemj.2658-0845.18
24. Van Knippenberg D. (2020). Meaning-based leadership. Organizational Psychology Review. 10(1). 6–28. DOI: 10.1177/2041386619897618
25. Wyrzykowska B. (2019). Teal Organizations: Literature Review and Future Research Directions. Central European Management Journal. 27 (4). 124–141. DOI: 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.12