CORRUPTION AND SHADOW ECONOMY AS DETERMINING FACTORS OF INFLUENCE ON ECONOMIC SECURITY OF UKRAINE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Abstract. In today’s world, we are witnessing the aggravation of new global problems of our time. This period is marked by the growth of crisis phenomena, which stimulate states of different levels of development to form integration groups. The main goal of these associations is to overcome barriers to the free movement of goods, capital and labor. The desire for integration becomes an integral part of the optimal model of involvement of the domestic economy in world processes and a necessary prerequisite for overcoming systemic crisis phenomena. Despite all efforts, widespread corruption in all sectors of the economy and spheres of public administration, a high level of the shadow economy create countless obstacles to the implementation of the necessary reforms. These problems significantly affect the investment attractiveness of Ukraine, which slows down the process and reduces the effectiveness of reforms, which often acquire only a formal character. In addition to the above, corruption today is part of the shadow economy, which poses a serious threat to the security of the entire country. Corruption and the shadow economy are a new serious challenge for modern Ukraine, because by casting a shadow on the country’s prospects for sustainable economic development, it devalues all attempts to develop successfully and freely. Today, the listed phenomena determine the economic landscape, violating the principles of effective management and undermining the foundations of economic security. Analysis of the impact of corruption and the shadow economy becomes a key aspect for understanding the current situation and developing strategies to overcome these challenges.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
corruption, shadow economy, national security, economic security.
2. Hrytsyshen, D.O., Dykyi, A.P. & Butuzov V.M. (2023). Subiekty harantuvannia ekonomichnoi bezpeky [Economic security guarantee subjects]. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrainy, 3(161), 16–26 [In Ukrainian].
3. Dyka, O.S., Naumchuk, K.M. & Trosteniuk, T.M. (2023). Ekonomichna bezpeka Ukrainy v umovakh vplyvu koruptsii [Economic security of Ukraine under the influence of corruption]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia: Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia, 4, 3-9. DOI https://doi.org/10.32782/ tnv-pub.2023.4.1 [In Ukrainian].
4. Kazak, O., Ramskyi, A., Hontar, Z., Podzihun, S. & Naumchuk K. (2023). Formuvannia bezpekovoho seredovyshcha shliakhom minimizatsii nehatyvnoho vplyvu zahroz u sotsialno-ekonomichnii systemi [Formation of a safe environment by minimizing the negative impact of threats in the socio-economic system]. Finansovo-kredytna diialnist: problemy teorii ta praktyky, 3 (50), 256–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.50.2023.4074 [In Ukrainian].
5. Lutsenko, M.M. & Shcherbyna, L.I. (2015). Koruptsiia v Ukraini: suchasnyi stan i problemy protydii [Corruption in Ukraine: current state and problems of countermeasures]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu, 15 (2), 142–145. URL: http://www.vesnik-pravo.mgu. od.ua/arhive/juspradenc15/part_2/40.pdf [In Ukrainian].
6. Savytskyi, O. (2017). Hromadski eksperty: uriad Ukrainy imituie, a ne vykonuie Antykoruptsiinu stratehiiu [Public experts: the government of Ukraine imitates and does not implement the Anti- Corruption Strategy]. Newspaper «Deutsche Welle». URL: https://m.dw.com/uk/hromadski-eksperty- uriad-ukrainy-imituie-a-ne-vykonuie-antykoruptsiinu-stratehiiu/a-38422913 [In Ukrainian].
7. Svirko, S.V., Dykyi, A.P. & Trosteniuk T.M. (2022). Upravlinnia biudzhetnoiu bezpekoiu v konteksti ekonomichnoho rozvytku krainy: ryzyk ta zahrozy [Budget security management in the context of the country’s economic development: risk and threats]. Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnia, 36, 117–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/easterneurope.36-18 [In Ukrainian].
8. Suprunova, I.V. (2023). Prychyny tinizatsii ekonomiky v konteksti zabezpechennia natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy [Reasons for the shadowing of the economy in the context of ensuring national security of Ukraine]. Aktualni Problemy Ekonomiky,. 259, 6-13. DOI:10.32752/1993-6788-2023-1-259-6-13 [In Ukrainian].
9. Transperensi Interneshnl Ukraina. URL: https://ti-ukraine.org/ti_format/doslidzhennya/cpi/
10. Campos, J. E., & Root, H. L. (1996). The Key to the Asian Miracle: Making Shared Growth Credible. The Brookings Institution.
11. Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1998). Regulatory Discretion and the Unofficial Economy. American Economic Review, 88(2), 387–392.
12. Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling Corruption. University of California Press.
13. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
14. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.
15. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2016). Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone. UNDP.
16. World Bank. (2011). World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development. The World Bank.