THE NATIONAL ELITE OF UKRAINE IN THE POST-HETMANATE ERA AND PROCESSES OF STATE CREATION IN THE EUROPEAN CONTENT
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Current problems of the study of the national elite of Ukraine in the post-hetma period at the end of the 18th – the first half of the 19th centuries are highlighted. in the system of cultural studies taking into account the processes of state formation in the European content. The role and place of the descendants of the leading strata of the Ukrainian Cossack-Hetman state in the historical and cultural processes of this period, who were the bearers of the national idea, and the processes themselves are characterized by the revival of Ukrainian national culture, are outlined. The priority in the research is an interdisciplinary integrative approach to the problem, which objectively illuminates the Ukrainian nobility of the former Left Bank of Ukraine-Hetmanship and the post-Hetmanship period of the 19th century as a systemic integrity, united by: the material basis of its existence; political autonomy and independence, which was ensured by the corresponding legal and legal status; common elements of sociocultural psychology, which was based on awareness of its historical mission and protection of national cultural heritage. The theoretical and methodological basis of such research is the principles of historicism, systematicity, objectivity, comprehensiveness, continuity, dialectical understanding of the historical process as a unity of its components. An objective analysis of the problem indicates the need for substantiation, definition and formation of a separate direction in modern humanitarian science – cultural elitology.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
national elite, nation building, elite building, cultural building, Cossack-elder elite, descendants of the Hetman-elder stratum, cultural identification, cultural environment, elite transformation, Ukrainian nobility, cultural elitology
2. Bahalii D. I. (1993) Narysy ukrainskoi istoriohrafii doby feodalizmu y doby kapitalistychnoi. Tretii rozdil: Pomishchytska istoriohrafiia kintsia XVIII i pershoi chverti XIX v. Arkhivy Ukrainy. No. 1–3. S. 23–31. (in Ukrainian)
3. Bilokin S. I. (1992) Pro natsionalnu arystokratiiu Ukrainy. Rozbudova derzhavy. Vyp. 26. S. 240–249. (in Ukrainian)
4. Horenko L. I. (2009) Intelektualna elita Ukrainy kintsia XVIII – pershoi polovyny XIX st. (za materialamy diialnosti Novhorod-Siverskoho hurtka “avtonomistiv”). Kultura i suchasnist: Almanakh. Kyiv: Milenium. No. 1. S. 54–61. (in Ukrainian)
5. Horenko L. I. (2007) Proekty zasnuvannia universytetiv v Ukraini XVIII – pochatku XIX stolittia (kulturolohichnyi aspekt). Aktualni problemy istorii, teorii ta praktyky khudozhnoi kultury: Zb. nauk. prats. Vypusk XIX. Kyiv: Milenium. S. 51–60. (in Ukrainian)
6. Horenko L. I. (2009) Ukrainske naukove rodoznavstvo: stan, problemy ta perspektyvy doslidzhennia. Ukrainska osvita u svitovomu chasoprostori: Materialy Tretoho Mizhnarodnoho konhresu (m. Kyiv, 21–22 zhovtnia 2009 r.). Kyiv: Ukrainske ahentstvo informatsii ta druku “Rada”. Kn. 1. S. 108–115. (in Ukrainian)
7. Zhuravskyi V. S. ta in. (1998) Politychna elita Ukrainy: teoriia i praktyka transformatsii [V. S. Zhuravskyi, O. Yu. Kucherenko, M. I. Mykhalchenko]. Kyiv: Vyd-vo “Lohos”. 264 s. (in Ukrainian)
8. Kysliuk K. V. (2009) Ukrainska istoriosofiia yak fenomen kulturnoi pamiati. Avtoref. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia doktora kulturolohii za spets. 26.00.04. – ukrainska kultura. Kharkiv: KhDAK. 38 s. (in Ukrainian)
9. Kysliuk K. V. (2008) Istoriosofiia v ukrainskii kulturi: vid kontseptu do kontseptsii: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: KhDAK. 288 s. (in Ukrainian)
10. Kolodii A. (1997) Natsiia yak subiekt polityky: monohrafiia. Lviv: Kalvariia. 55 s. (in Ukrainian)
11. Kryvosheia V. V. (2002) Henealohiia ukrainskoho kozatstva. Narysy istorii kozatskykh polkiv. Vydannia druhe, dopovnene. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Stylos”. 389 s. (in Ukrainian)
12. Kryvosheia V. V. (1998) Natsionalna elita Hetmanshchyny (Personalnyi sklad i henealohiia. 1648–1782 rr.). Kyiv: IPiEND NANU. Ch. I. 269 s.; Ch. II. 344 s. (in Ukrainian)
13. Kryvosheia V. V. (1994) Ukrainska henealohiia: stan i perspektyvy rozvytku. Persha zaochna nauk. konf. z pytan henealohii i biohrafiky, prysviach. 160-richchiu z dnia narodzhennia O. M. Lazarevskoho. Tezy povidomlen. m. Vinnytsia, 14 chervnia 1994 r. Vinnytsia. S. 3–4. (in Ukrainian)
14. Lazarevskyi A. M. (1894) Prezhnye yzuskately malorusskoi starynu. Kyevskaia staryna. T. XLVII. No. 12. S. 34–387. (in Ukrainian)
15. Ostashko T. (1997) Dontsov Dmytro Ivanovych. Malyi slovnyk istorii Ukrainy [V. Smolii, S. Kulchytskyi, O. Maiboroda ta in.]. Kyiv: Lybid. S. 138–139. (in Ukrainian)
16. Ostashko T. (1997) Lypynskyi Viacheslav. Malyi slovnyk istorii Ukrainy [V. Smolii, S. Kulchytskyi, O. Maiboroda ta in.]. Kyiv: Lybid. S. 233–234. (in Ukrainian)
17. Strukevych O. K. (2003) Politychna elita. Istoriia ukrayinskoi kultury. U piaty tomakh. Tom 3: Ukrayinska kultura druhoi polovyny XVII–XVIII stolit. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. S. 319–358. (in Ukrainian)
18. Tokar L. K. (2002) Dosvid ta uroky buttia v samopiznanni y samotvorenni ukrainskoho narodu. Ukrainoznavstvo. Kyiv: NDIU. No. 3. S. 56–63. (in Ukrainian)
19. Tomazov V. V. (2006) Henealohiia kozatsko-starshynskykh rodiv: istoriohrafiia ta dzherela (druha polovyna XVII – pochatok XXI st.). Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Stylos”. 284 c. (in Ukrainian)
20. Tomazov V. V. (2001) Stanovlennia ukrainskoi henealohii yak naukovoi dys-tsypliny. Pochatkovyi etap. Spetsialni istorychni dystsypliny: pytannia teorii ta metodyky. 36. nauk. prats i spohadiv: U 2 ch. Kyiv, 2001. Chyslo 6 (7). Ch. 1. S. 96–104. (in Ukrainian)
21. Yakovenko N. M. (1993) Ukrainska shliakhta z kintsia XIV do seredyny XVII st.: (Volyn i Tsentralna Ukraina). Vidpov. red. V. Smolii. Kyiv: Nauk. dumka. 416 s. (in Ukrainian)