HUMAN-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DIALOGUE: IN THE CONTEXT OF HUMANISM AND THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL MEANINGS OF INTELLECTUAL VIRTUE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article takes a philosophical look at the possibility and peculiarities of human-artificial intelligence dialogue in the light of modern epistemological principles. In the approach, the interaction of the concepts of "natural consciousness", "artificial consciousness", "artificial intelligence", "double contingency", "recursiveness", "implicit knowledge", "obvious knowledge" is considered as a systematic theoreticalmethodological categorical apparatus. At this time, the relations of these concepts are examined against the background of the concepts of "humanism" and "intellectual virtue" and within the principle of dialogicity of consciousness. The main scientific goal of the research is related to the highlighted features. It is shown that human-artificial intelligence dialogue as a whole is possible in the aspect of the principle of humanism. However, this issue should have its own mechanism of realization in the philosophical and epistemological context. In that quality, the article puts forward the thesis that "intellectual virtue" can play a constructive role. At the same time, the place and role of double contingency and recursion phenomena are important among the epistemological conditions of the possibility of human-artificial intelligence dialogue in the context of humanism. Double contingency defines the epistemological boundary of that dialogue. Recursiveness plays the role of its cognitive mechanism in the aspect of continuity and gradual realization of the process.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
artificial consciousness, artificial intelligence, double contingency, recursion, obvious knowledge, implicit knowledge, social sensitivity, cognitive, dialogicity of consciousness
2. Blakely, R. Science: (Electronic resource) // AI ‘could be like an alien invasion’ says British professor.
3 December – 2023. Müraciət tarixi 09.12.2023. URL: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ai-could-be-like-an-alien-invasion-says-british-professor-2w3sm5wrd.
3. Chalmers, D. A Computotional Foundation for the Study of Cognition // D. Chalmers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. The Journal of Cognitive Science. 2011, № 12, pp. 323–357.
4. Collins, H. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge // H.Collins. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. – Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2010, 186 pp.
5. Elvidge, J. Digital Consciousness: A Transformative Vision. Digital Consciousness: A Transformative Vision. John Hunt Publishing Limited. 2018, 287 pp. ISBN 978-1-78535-760-2
6. Greco, J. Pritchard’s case for veritism // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2021, vol. 58, № 4, pp. 46–53.
7. Hui Y. Recursivity and Contingency. Recursivity and Contingency. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2019, 336 pp. ISBN: 978-1786600523.
8. Humanism and Its Aspirations: Humanist Manifesto III, a Successor to the Humanist Manifesto of 1933 // American Humanist Association, 2007. URL: https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/manifesto3/. Müraciət tarixi 11.12.2023.
9. Junge J., et al. Improving Robotic Cooking Using Batch Bayesian Optimization // J.Junge, J.Hughes, T.G.Thuruthel, F.Iida. Piscataway. Journal “IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters”. 2020, vol. 5, № 2, pp. 760–765.
10. Kaplan, A., Haenlein, M. Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence// ScienceDirect. Journals & Books. Elsevier. Volume 62, Issue 1, January–February. 2019, Pages: 15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018. 08.004.
11. Lee, E. A. The Coevolution: The Entwined Futures of Humans and Machines // E.A. Lee. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press, 2020, 384 pp.
12. Mamedzade, I.R., Dadashova, S.N. O filosofii iskusstvennogo intellekta i nauchnoy revolyutsii //Voprosy filosofii. 2023, № 4. с. 206–215. DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-206-215.
13. McCarthy, J. What is Artificial Intelligence?: (Electronic resource) // Stanford University. Computer Science Department. 2015. URL: http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai/whatisai.html. Müraciət tarixi 09.12.2023.
14. Nowotny, H. In AI We Trust. Power, Illusion and Control of Predictive Algorithms // H.Novotny. Cambridge: UK: Polity Press. 2021, 200 pp.
15. Parsons, T. The Structure of Social Action. a study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers. (3d ed.) // T.Parsons. New York: Free Press. 1968, 817 pp.
16. Pauketat, J. The Terminology of Artificial Sentience: (Electronic resource) // Sentience İnstitute. 2021. URL: https://www.sentienceinstitute.org/blog/ artificial-sentience-terminology. DOİ: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/sujwf. Müraciət tarixi 10.12.2023.
17. Polanyi, M. The tacit dimension / M. Polanyi. Polanyi, M. The tacit dimension. London: ANCHOR BOOKS. 2009, 128 pp. ISBN: 038506988X, 9780385069885.
18. Pritchard, D. In defence of veritism // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2021, vol. 58, № 4, pp. 22–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps 202158456.
19. Reggia, J. The rise of machine consciousness: Studying consciousness with computational models // J.Reggia. 2013. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Journal “Neural Networks”, № 44, pp. 112–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2013.03.011, PMID 23597599
20. Ryan, Sh. Wisdom, not veritism // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2021, vol. 58, № 4, pp. 60–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps 202158460.
21. Smith, D. H., Schillaci, G. "Why Build a Robot With Artificial Consciousness? How to Begin? A Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue on the Design and Implementation of a Synthetic Model of Consciousness" // 2021, Frontiers in Psychology. № 12, pp. 530–560. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.530560. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 8096926. PMID 33967869.
22. Spencer-Brown, G. Laws of Form // G. Spencer-Brown. Laws of Form. N.Y.: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1969, 147 p.
23. Thaler, S. L. “The emerging intelligence and its critical look at us” // S.L.Thaler. Durham: International Association for Near-Death Studies Journal of Near-Death Studies. 1998, № 17 (1), pp. 21–29. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1022990118714. S2CID 49573301.