THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN DEVELOPING AUTOGENIC TRAINING FOR PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL STATE CORRECTION IN HIGH-RISK PROFESSIONALS TO PREVENT FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The aim of the article is to assess the potential for implementing AI tools in the development of autogenic training programs aimed at correcting the psychophysical state of high-risk professionals prone to disorders leading to functional impairments. Research findings indicate that high-risk professions are associated with stress, high demands, and hazards that contribute to the development of psychophysical disorders, such as burnout and emotional exhaustion. Autogenic training is an effective self-regulation method that reduces stress and enhances overall well-being, becoming a key element in the prevention of burnout and emotional exhaustion. AI can be utilized to create personalized applications that provide interactive effects for sensations of warmth and heaviness, recording and playback of personalized affirmations, audio-visual effects to create a sensation of coolness, audio guides for the sensation of gravity, tools for deep relaxation, and musical accompaniments for music therapy.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
autogenic training, psychophysical disorders, high-risk professions, applications, artificial intelligence, correction programs
2. Care, M. (2023). Mental health apps and the role of AI in emotional well-being. MyaCare. URL: https://myacare.com/blog/mental-health-apps-and-the-role-of-ai-in-emotional-wellbeing
3. Ernst, E., & Kanji, N. (2000). Autogenic training for stress and anxiety: A systematic review. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 8, 106–110. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10859603/
4. Khammissa, R., Nemutandani, S., Feller, G., Lemmer, J., Feller, L. (2022). Burnout phenomenon: neurophysiological factors, clinical features, and aspects of management. J Int Med Res. 2022 Sep; 50(9):3000605221106428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605221106428
5. Kircher, T.; Teutsch, E.; Wormstall, H.; Buchkremer, G.; Thimm, E. (2002). Effects of autogenic training in elderly patients. Z. Gerontol. Geriatr. 35, 157–165. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s003910200020
6. Kumar, K., Shankar, A., & Singh, A. (2022). Mental health problems among mental health professionals: A neglected issue. International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research, 9(1), 13–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijamr.ijamr_67_22
7. Makara-Studzińska, M., Kruczek, A., Borzyszkowska, A., Załuski, M., Adamczyk, K., Basińska, M.A. (2022) Profiles of Occupational Burnout in the Group of Representatives of High-Risk Professions in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10):6297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106297
8. Molton, I. & Raichle, K.. (2009). Psychophysiological Disorders. Diagnostic Interviewing (pp. 343–369). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1320-3_15
9. Seo, E.; Kim, S. (2019). Effect of Autogenic Training for Stress Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. 49, 361–374. URL: https://jkan.or.kr/DOIx.php?id=10.4040/jkan.2019.49.4.361
10. Stern, R.M., William, J., & Karen S. Q. (2012). Applications of Psychophysiological Recording. Psychophysiological Recording, 2nd edn. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195113594.003.0015