LATVIA’S LEGISLATIVE REFORMS IN RELIGIOUS POLICY: STRATEGIES FOR STRENGTHENING NATIONAL SECURITY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
This article examines Latvia’s strategic approach to countering Russian influence through the religious sphere, focusing on the Latvian Orthodox Church’s transition to full independence. After regaining independence in 1991, Latvia faced the challenge of integrating a significant Russian-speaking minority, which affected the country’s religious landscape. The government enacted legislation to restore religious freedom and introduced specific laws for major denominations, including the Latvian Orthodox Church. In 2022, Latvia amended the law to commence the process of establishing full independence for the church, effectively reducing the influence of the Russian Orthodox Church. This cooperation between the state and the church enhanced national security without infringing on religious freedom. The study highlights how Latvia’s unique legal framework and policies can serve as a model for Ukraine, which faces similar challenges due to Russia’s hybrid warfare tactics that exploit religious affiliation. By adapting Latvia’s methods, Ukraine could strengthen national unity and resilience against external interference while preserving religious diversity and freedom.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Political Model of Religious Relations, Legislative Regulation of Religious Organizations, State-Confessional Relations, Hybrid Warfare and Religion, Baltic Religious Policy, Religious Diversity Management, Secularism and Religious Freedom
2. Freedom in the World 2024: Latvia. (2024). Retrieved from freedomhouse.org/country/latvia/freedom-world/2024
3. Law on Religious Organisations. Riga, 1995. Retrieved from likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/36874-law-on-religious-organisations
4. Law on the Latvian Orthodox Church. Riga, 2008. Retrieved from likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/184626-law-on-the-latvian-orthodox-church
5. Mārtiņš Drēģeris. (2022). “Būt karā” jeb pusceļā uz jaunu Latvijas Pareizticīgās baznīcas statusu. [“Being at war” or halfway to a new status for the Latvian Orthodox Church]. Jurista Vārds. Retrieved from juristavards.lv/doc/281908-but-kara-jeb-puscela-uz-jaunu-latvijas-pareizticigas-baznicas-statusu [in Latvian].
6. Miakinchenko, I., Sologub, M., Podkur, V. (2024). Vseukrayinska Rada Tserkov i Relihiynykh Organizatsiy v Umovakh Fullomastabnoyi Rosiyis’koyi Viyskovoyi Ahresiyi Proty Ukrayiny [All-Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations in the Conditions of Full-Scale Russian Military Aggression Against Ukraine]. Intermarum: Istoriya, Polityka, Kultura, (14), 72–90. doi: 10.35433/history.112070 [in Ukrainian].
7. Nasikivska, V. (2022). Tserkva yak element "gostroyi syly" Rosiys'koï Federatsii [Church as an Element of the "Hard Power" of the Russian Federation]. Mizhnarodni ta politychni doslidzhennia, (35), 80–92. doi: 10.18524/2707-5206.2022.35.259105 [in Ukrainian].
8. Official Statistics Portal. Population by ethnicity at the beginning of year 1935–2024. Retrieved from data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__POP__IR__IRE/IRE010
9. Official Statistics Portal. Registered religious congregations by denomination at the end of year 1990–2021. Retrieved from data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__IZG__KU__KUR/KUR010/
10. On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organizations, Kyiv, 1991. Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/987-12?lang=en#Text
11. On the Return of Properties to Religious Organisations. Riga, 1992. Retrieved from likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/65537-on-the-return-of-properties-to-religious-organisations
12. Orthodox Church of Latvia seceded from Moscow – It was a matter of national security, says the President. (2022). Orthodox Times. Retrieved from orthodoxtimes.com/orthodox-church-of-latviaseceded-from-moscow-it-was-a-matter-of-national-security-says-the-president/
13. Par grozījumiem Latvijas Pareizticīgās Baznīcas likumā. [On amendments to the Latvian Orthodox Church Law] Riga, 2022. Retrieved from pravoslavie.lv/index.php?newid=9660&lang=LV [in Latvian].
14. Par Latvijas Republikas un Svētā Krēsla līgumu. [On the Agreement between the Republic of Latvia and the Holy See] Riga, 2002. Retrieved from likumi.lv/ta/id/66742-par-latvijas-republikas-un-sveta-kresla-ligumu [in Latvian].
15. Par reliģiskajām organizācijām. [On religious organization’s] Riga, 1990. Retrieved from likumi.lv/ta/id/72588-par-religiskajam-organizacijam [in Latvian].
16. Ringolds Balodis, M. L. (1999) A Religious Organization in the Latvian State: Its Rights and Obligations. Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 19 : Iss. 4 , Article 1.
17. Rohtmets, Priit and Teraudkalns, Valdis (2024) The Estonian and Latvian Orthodox Churches of the Moscow Patriarchate before and after the Russian war in Ukraine. Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 44 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. doi: 10.55221/2693-2229.2486
18. Sagan, O. (2017). Derzhavno-cerkovni vidnosyny v Ukrayini na suchasnomu etapi: ob’yektivna neobkhidnist zminy modelei [State-church relations in Ukraine at the current stage: the objective need for model changes]. Religijna svoboda, (20), 39–44 [in Ukrainian].
19. State Revenue Service. Annual Report of Religious Organizations and their Activities based on 2022 data. Retrieved from vid.gov.lv/en/services/religious-organisation-annual-report
20. The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. Riga, 1922. Retrieved from likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/57980-the-constitution-of-the-republic-of-latvia
21. V RPTS oburilis, shcho mitropolit Rizkyi ne pominaie Kyryla ta khyrotonizuvav yepiskopa bez yikhnoi zhodny [ROC members were outraged that the Metropolitan of Riga did not commemorate Kirill and consecrated a bishop without their consent]. (2023) Retrieved from risu.ua/v-rpc-oburilis-shcho-mitropolit-rizkij-ne-pominaye-kirila-ta-hirotonizuvav-yepiskopa-bez-yihnoyi-zgodi_n141969 [in Ukrainian].
22. Vasin, M. (2019). Sucasna derzhavna-cerkovna vazayemodiya v Ukrayini: pereosmyslennya konstitutsijnykh zasad [Modern state-church interaction in Ukraine: rethinking the constitutional foundations]. Chasopys Kyivskogo universytetu prava, (3), 80–87. doi: 10.36695/2219-5521.3.2019.13 [in Ukrainian].
23. Virsgana dievkalpojums Rīgas Svētās Trijādības katedrālē [Archbishop's service was held in Riga Holy Trinity Cathedral] Riga, 2024. Retrieved from pravoslavie.lv/index.php?newid=10384&lang=LV [in Latvian].