PECULIARITIES OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS FOR THE FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE IN LEARNING ENGLISH FOR PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Abstract. The issue of developing students' communicative competence in the study of English is highlighted by the requirements for professional training outcomes in higher education institutions and current societal demands. It is summarised that communicative competence is developed through direct interaction and becomes the result of communication experience for individuals. Communicative competence is viewed as the ability to understand and produce English at the phonological, lexico-grammatical, and cultural knowledge and language skills level and in accordance with the goals and specifics of professional communication situations. Purposeful work towards developing students' communicative competence during the study of English for professional purposes is understood as a holistic process of structuring the educational process based on the alignment of its key components: goal-setting (reflecting the aim of the study and the requirement for the simultaneous participation of all students in completing specific tasks); content (based on the selection of specialised learning tasks); technological (defining the conditions, methods, and tools for the development of communicative competence); and evaluative-resultative (designing tools to determine the effectiveness of the proposed changes and their impact on the state of communicative competence among higher education students).
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
peculiarities, educational process, students, communicative competence, English for professional purposes.
2. Hryshkova, R. O. (2015). Metodyka navchannia anhliiskoi movy za profesiinym spriamuvanniam studentiv nefilolohichnykh spetsialnostei [Methods of teaching English in the professional direction of students of non-philological specialties]: navch. posib. Mykolaiv: vyd-vo ChDU im. Petra Mohyly. 220. [in Ukrainian].
3. Kriukova, Ye. S., Pavlovych, A. V. (2019). Vykorystannia suchasnykh tekhnolohii u vyvchenni inozemnoi movy [The use of modern technologies in the study of foreign languages]. Pedahohika formuvannia tvorchoi osobystosti u vyshchii i zahalnoosvitnii shkolakh, 62, 54–58. [in Ukrainian].
4. Kukhta, I. V. (2018). Inshomovna kompetentnist u konteksti formuvannia komunikatyvnoi kultury studentiv u protsesi vyvchennia inozemnoi movy [Foreign Language Competence in the Context of Forming Students' Communication Culture in the Process of Learning a Foreign Language]. Humanizm ta osvita. URL: http://conf.vntu.edu.ua/humed/2008/txt/Kuchta.php (data zvernennia: 20.11.2024). [in Ukrainian].
5. Panasenko, H., Akopian, H. (2010). Osoblyvosti profesiino oriientovanoho navchannia inozemnykh mov studentiv u nemovnykh VNZ [Peculiarities of professionally oriented foreign language teaching in non-language universities]. Ridna shkola, 1, 32. [in Ukrainian].
6. Salashchenko, H. M. (2019). Osoblyvosti formuvannia inshomovnoi komunikatyvnoi kompetentsii studentiv ta kursantiv nemovnykh zakladiv vyshchoi osvity zasobamy proiektnykh tekhnolohii. [Peculiarities of the formation of foreign language communicative competence of students of non-linguistic higher educational institutions by means of project technologies]. Pravovyi chasopys Donbasu, 3 (68). 78–84. [in Ukrainian].
7. Tarnopolskyi, O. B., Dehtiarova, Yu. V. (2011). Avtentychnist navchalnykh materialiv u navchanni anhliiskoi movy dlia profesiinoi komunikatsii u nemovnykh vyshakh. [Authenticity of learning materials in teaching of English for professional communication at non-linguistic tertiary schools]. Visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu bezpeky zhyttiediialnosti, 5(2), 242–245. [in Ukrainian].
8. Iakovleva, N. V. (2003). Psykholoho-pedahohichni umovy podolannia komunikatyvnykh barieriv u protsesi vyvchennia inozemnoi movy [Psychological-pedagogical conditions of overcoming of communicative barriers in the process of learning foreign language]. (Аvtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. psykhol. Nauk: 19.00.07). Kyiv. 20. [in Ukrainian].
9. Shestopalova, S. (2021). Formuvannia Inshomovnoi komunikatyvnoi kompetentsii u mahistriv publichnoho upravlinnia ta administruvannia [Formation of Foreign Language Communicative Competence in Masters of Public Administration and Management]. Naukovyi visnyk: Derzhavne upravlinnia, (2(8), 185–205. [in Ukrainian].
10. Byram, M., Gribkova, B., & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: a practical introduction for teachers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. 42.
11. Camerer, R. (2014). Testing intercultural competence in (International) English: Some basic questions and suggested answers. Language Learning in Higher Education, 4(1), 207‒236.
12. Celce-Murcia, M. (2017). Rethinking the Role of Communicative Competence in Language Teaching. Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning, 9, 41–57.
13. Hoff, H. E. (2014). A critical discussion of Byram’s model of intercultural communicative competence in the light of Bildung theories. Intercultural Education, 25(6), 508–518.
14. Holmes, P., O’Neill, G. (2012). Developing and evaluating intercultural competence: Ethnographies of intercultural encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(5), 707–718.
15. Huang, Z. M. (2022). A critical understanding of students’ intercultural experience: non-essentialism and epistemic justice. Intercultural Education, 3(33). 247‒263.
16. Matsuo, C. (2012). A critique of Michael Byram’s intercultural communicative competence model from the perspective of model type and conceptualisation of culture. Fukuoka University Review of Literature and Humanities, 44(2), 347–380.
17. Mirzaei, A., Forouzandeh, F. (2013). Relationship Between Intercultural Communicative Competence and L2-Learning Motivation of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42(3), 300‒318.
18. Savignon, S. J. (1997). Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. USA: McGraw-Hill, 206.
19. Schnabel, M.A.D. (2015). Intercultural Competence: Development and Validation of a Theoretical Framework, a Cross-Cultural Multimethod Test, and a Collaborative Assessment Intervention. Dissertation. Aus Frankfurt am Main, Tübingen. 201.
20. Unin, N., Bearing, P. (2016). Brainstorming as a Way to Approach Studentcentered Learning in the ESL Classroom. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci, 224, 605– 612.