CHARACTERISTICS OF INSURANCE ACCESSORIES
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Insurance is a necessary element of modern society, it allows not only to provide compensation for the damage caused to the policy holder, but also to protect him from possible insured risks. The relevance of the article is due to the need to classify insurance as a means of ensuring the fulfilment of obligations. The use of insurance as a means of securing obligations in legal doctrine is still debatable, and there is no unified position among legal scholars as to whether insurance is recognised as a security for the performance of obligations, which would make it possible to determine its accessory nature. At the same time, the possibilities of insurance of the risk of liability for breach of contractual obligations are considered, when insurance becomes dependent on the main obligation. The author studies the classification of forms of security, analyses the specifics of insurance and its types. This helps to reveal the potential of using insurance as security for the principal obligation. The article reveals how the specificities of certain types of insurance contracts, revealing the signs of their accessory nature, the relevant conclusions are made as to whether the insurance contract can act as collateral (related) security of the main obligation, corresponding to the signs of accessory nature.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
accessory, guarantee, insurance, insurer, policy holder, surety
2. Gollier C. (2003) To Insure or Not to Insure?: An Insurance Puzzle. – The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory. Vol. 28. No. 1.
3. Wollner K.S. (1999). How to Draft and Interpret Insurance Policies. West Bloomfield, MI: Casualty Risk Publishing LLC.
4. Insurance Contract Law. Law of the Republic of Latvia. Adopted: 03.05.2018. Enters into force: 01.06.2018. Latvijas Vēstnesis. No. 97. (18.05.2018) Retrieved from: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/299053
5. Torgans K. (2018) Law of obligations. (Saistību tiesības). Second updated edition. Riga: Courthouse Agency. P.36 [In Latvian]
6. Steven A. (2009) Accessoriness and Security over Land. Edinburgh Law Review. No. 2009/07. p. 21. Retrieved from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1371139
7. Kaser M. (1971) Das Privatrecht. Erster Abschnitt: Das, das vorklassische und das klassische Recht. 2. Aufl. C.H. Beck. s. 457
8. Mowbray A. H., Blanchard R. H. (1961) Insurance: Its Theory and Practice in the United States (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Available through HeinOnline. p. 54.
9. Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I). OJ L 177, 4.7.2008. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/593/oj
10. Commercial Pledge Law. Law of the Republic of Latvia. Adopted: 21.10.1998. Entered into force on 01.03.1999. Latvijas Vēstnesis. No. 337/338. (11.11.1998) Retrieved from: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/50685
11. Civil Code of the Republic of Latvia. The fourth part. Law of Obligations. Adopted in the Republic of Latvia on 28.01.1937. Entered into force on 01.03.1993. Reporter. No. 1. (14.01.1993) [In Latvian]
12. Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia Nr.691 “On consumer lending”. Accepted: 25.10.2016. Enters into force: 01.11.2016. Latvijas Vēstnesis. No. 213. (01.11.2016) Retrieved from: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/285975-noteikumi-par-pateretaja-kreditesanu [In Latvian]