ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE PROBLEM OF RESPONSIBILITY: THE NEW BOUNDARIES OF ETHICS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 30, 2025

  Laman Garayeva Ahmad

  Tamilla Rzayeva Zahir

Abstract

The article philosophically analyses the issues of responsibility, morality, and ethical decision- making that arise in the context of the development of artificial intelligence (AI). The author focuses on the distribution of responsibility between humans and technological agents, as well as on the nature of intention and moral values. The main objective is to examine whether artificial systems are capable of making moral decisions and to show how this relates to the ethical position of the human being. The study compares the behavioural models of AI with the particularities of human consciousness and evaluates the integration of technology into ethical principles along with its social implications. The author notes that as AI advances, the concept of morality acquires not only an individual but also a systemic character; that is, responsibility becomes the joint product of human–machine interaction rather than belonging solely to a single agent. At the same time, adopting a posthumanist perspective, the article questions the central position of the human and explores the possibility of technological entities occupying a place within the moral order. Thus, artificial intelligence is presented not merely as a technical phenomenon but as a philosophical event that stimulates the emergence of a new moral paradigm.

How to Cite

Ahmad, L. G., & Zahir, T. R. (2025). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE PROBLEM OF RESPONSIBILITY: THE NEW BOUNDARIES OF ETHICS. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (4), 143-148. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2025-4-17
Article views: 0 | PDF Downloads: 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

artificial intelligence, responsibility, morality, ethical decision-making, philosophy of technology, posthumanism

References
1. Arslan, M. (2022). Yapay zekâ etiği ve sosyal adalet sorunları. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
2. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
3. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.229 p.
4. Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press.240 p.
5. Bryson, J. (2018). Patiency is not a virtue: AI and the design of ethical systems. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 15–26.
6. Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press. 248 p.
7. Əliyev, R. (2019). Süni intellekt və məsuliyyət: Azərbaycan konteksti. Bakı: Nurlan Nəşriyyatı.
8. Əliyeva, S. (2022). Posthumanizm və etik məsuliyyətin transformasiyası. Bakı: Elm Nəşriyyatı.
9. Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical posthumanism. Bloomsbury Publishing. 296 p.
10. Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press. 357 p.
11. Həsənov, E. (2021). Texnoloji etik düşüncə və süni intellekt problemləri. Bakı: Elm Nəşriyyatı.
12. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press. 263 p.
13. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press. 301 p.
14. Yıldırım, S. (2021). Otonom sistemler ve etik sorumluluk. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.