CONTRACTUAL SUCCESSION LEGAL NORMS FUNCTIONALIZATION ISSUES. SECOND PART
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Mentioned article analyze contractual succession norms issues in regard to applicable law norms in regard to de lege ferenda legal relations in contracts and deals with mortis causa intention and consequences. To denote mortis causa contracts and deals legal basis and consequences by this moment contractual succession doctrine and practice uses lex personalis and lex rei sitae collision bindings. However, mutual and joint wills presence in contractual succession, as well as inheritance contract institute availability, this coexistence for applicable law denoting procedure goals force to involve in this process lex voluntatis collision binding. Due to this circumstance article gives analyze lex voluntatis collision bindings’ insertion into contractual succession law norms for mentioned norms’ formation issues. Article finishes with model code suggestion.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
applicable law, contractual succession, inheritance, inheritance agreement, inheritance contract
2. Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations. OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, pp. 6-16.
3. Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession. OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, pp. 107-134.
4. Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012
on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, pp. 1-32.
5. Austrian Act on Private International Law. Enacted 15.06.1978. In force Published: With amendments.
6. Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia. Enacted: 28.01.1937. In force: 01.09.1992. Published: Valdības Vēstnesis, 41, 20.02.1937. With amendments.
7. General Code on Civil law (ABGB). Enacted 1 June 1811. Into force 1 January 1812. Published: JGS Nr. 946/1811. With amendments
8. Swiss Civil Code. Adopted on May 28, 1904. Entered into force on December 10, 1907. Published: BBl 1904 IV 1, 1907 VI 367. With amendments.
9. Swiss Federal Act on Private International Law. Enacted: December 18, 1987. In force: January 1, 1989. Published: AS 1988 1776. With amendments.
10. Introductory Act to Civil Code. Enacted 18 August 1896. Into force 1 January 1900. Published: RGBl. S. 604 N 21. With amendments.
11. Battifol H., Lagarde P., Droit International Prive. Paris: 1993.
12. Haas Ulrich: Die Europäische Zuständigkeitsordnung in Erbsachen. Jud/Rechberger/Reichelt, Kollisionsrecht in der Europäischen Union. Wien, 2008.
13. Geoffey M. Hodgson. Economics and Insitutions. Polity Press and University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988.
14. Pawlowski, Mark. Mutual wills: some constructive thoughts. Family Law, 53. pp. 598-602.
15. Smits Jan. The Harmonisation of Private Law in Europe: Some Insights from Evolutionary Theory // 31 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 79 (2002).
16. Bix Brian H. Contract Law Theory. University of Minnesota Law School. Legal Studies Research Paper Series Research Paper No. 06-12.
17. Judgment of the Court of 20 February 1979. Rewe-Zentral AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Hessisches Finanzgericht – Germany. Measures heaving an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions. Case 120/78.
18. Matthews v. Bliss, 22 Pick (Mass.) 53.