NEW HUMANISM IN THE MODERN WORLD: GLOBAL CHALLENGES AND ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The contemporary world is undergoing a profound transformation characterized by the transition from traditional forms of social organization and ideological paradigms to new global frameworks shaped by globalization, technological development, and ecological challenges. These processes have intensified ethical, social, and environmental crises, revealing the limitations of classical humanism in addressing contemporary global realities. This article examines the emergence of New Humanism as a response to these challenges, emphasizing its ethical, ecological, and social dimensions. Drawing on key philosophical contributions and international documents, the study explores New Humanism as a holistic framework that integrates human rights, sustainable development, cultural diversity, and responsibility toward future generations. The findings demonstrate that New Humanism offers not merely a theoretical alternative but a practical philosophical foundation for addressing global crises and fostering a harmonious relationship between humanity, society, and nature.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Sustainable development, planetary ethics, cultural diversity, human potential, social responsibility, global governance, holistic philosophy
2. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). Sage Publications.
3. Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In K. Frankish & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 316–334). Cambridge University Press.
4. d’Orville, H. (2015). Human rights and global responsibility. Springer.
5. Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
6. Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press.
7. Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A perfect moral storm: Climate change, intergenerational ethics, and the problem of moral corruption. Oxford University Press.
8. Held, D. (2010). Global covenant: The social democratic alternative to the Washington consensus. Polity Press.
9. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age (M. E. Zimmerman, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
10. Kurtz, P. (2000). The humanist alternative. Prometheus Books.
11. Kurtz, P. (2015). Humanist manifesto: Third edition. Humanist Press.
12. Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac: And sketches here and there. Oxford University Press.
13. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. Chelsea Green Publishing.
14. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Belknap Press.
15. Ostrom, E. (2010). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
16. Peccei, A. (1980). The human quality. Pergamon Press.
17. Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
18. Rüsen, J. (2006). Humanity at the intersection of nature and culture. Kruger National Park Conference Proceedings.
19. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.
20. Solomon, R. C. (2011). Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford University Press.
21. UNESCO. (2001). Report of the High-Level Group Meeting on Peace and Dialogue among Cultures. UNESCO.
22. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.