STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF US INNOVATION SYSTEMS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL MODELS OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of strategic management of innovation systems in the United States within the context of global innovation management models. The methodological framework of the study is based on the classification approach to innovation system management models proposed by O. Likhota, which includes criteria such as the level of government intervention, institutional structure, R&D funding mechanisms, the role of public-private partnerships, and the effectiveness of intellectual property protection. The study employs a systemic-comparative approach to analyze strategic management models in the United States, the European Union, China, and Israel. The results of the study show that the effectiveness of national innovation systems is largely determined by the quality of strategic management and the ability to balance government regulation with market mechanisms. The findings contribute to the theoretical development of innovation management and can be applied in the formulation of national innovation policy.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
strategic management, innovation systems, United States, innovation governance, R&D, public-private partnership, global models.
2. Chukhno, A. A. (2003). Postindustrialna ekonomika: teoriia, praktyka ta yikh znachennia dlia Ukrainy [Post-industrial economy: theory, practice and their significance for Ukraine]. Lohos.
3. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=450206
4. Heiets, V. M. (2018). Instytutsiina obumovlenist endohenizatsii ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Institutional conditionality of endogenization of economic development]. Journal of European Economy, 17(2), 155–166. https://jeej.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/ukjee/article/view/1326
5. Likhota, O. (2025). Svitovi modeli derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia innovatsiinoi diialnosti [World models of state regulation of innovation activity]. Problems of Systemic Approach in the Economy, 2(99), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.32782/2520-2200/2025-2-5
6. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1918818
7. Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264. https://www.scribd.com/document/7298498/Malerba-2002-Sectoral-Systems-of-Innovation
8. Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. Anthem Press. http://digamo.free.fr/mazzucato.pdf
9. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496195
10. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227802298_Explicating_dynamic_capabilities_The_nature_and_microfoundations_of_sustainable_enterprise_performance