LINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO SELFHOOD AND CULTURAL IDENTITY FORMATION IN LITERARY DISCOURSE

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Jul 15, 2026

  Vusala Aghabayli

Abstract

This article examines the linguistic construction of selfhood and cultural identity in contemporary literary discourse through “How to Be Both”, “Frankissstein”, and “Girl, Woman, Other”. Drawing on discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, narrative linguistics, and cultural identity theory, the study investigates how language shapes fragmented, fluid, and multicultural identities in contemporary fiction. The research focuses on narrative structure, polyphony, code-switching, gendered discourse, and intersubjective communication as linguistic mechanisms of identity formation. The article argues that literary discourse functions as a dynamic space where cultural memory, gender performativity, and social belonging are continuously negotiated through language. By analyzing contemporary experimental narrative techniques, the study demonstrates that identity in modern literature is represented not as stable or fixed, but as discursively constructed, hybrid, and constantly evolving within cultural and ideological contexts.

How to Cite

Aghabayli, V. (2026). LINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO SELFHOOD AND CULTURAL IDENTITY FORMATION IN LITERARY DISCOURSE. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (2), 465-472. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2026-2-55
Article views: 1 | PDF Downloads: 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

sociolinguistics, queer linguistics, literary discourse, cultural identity, narrative linguistics.

References
1. Aghabayli, V. (2024). Perspectives on gender identity in modern British and Azerbaijani literature. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, 232–239. http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/bjlss/article/view/2363
2. Aghabayli, V. (2024). Unique standpoints of the distinctive British feminist writers of the 20th century (regarding gender concerns). Traektoriâ Nauki, 10(3), 4007–4015. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1267095
3. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
4. Evaristo, B. (2019). Girl, woman, other. Hamish Hamilton.
5. Fanon, F. (1952). Black skin, white masks. Pluto Press.
6. Hajiyeva, M. (2024). Chronotopic contrasts: Unraveling temporal dynamics in utopian and dystopian narratives. Traektoriâ Nauki, 10(3), 4001–4006. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1267094
7. Hajiyeva, M. (2024). Resilience and activism: The impact of young adult dystopian narratives on young readers. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, 247–255. http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/bjlss/article/view/2366
8. Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
9. Smith, A. (2014). How to be both. Penguin Books. (Kindle ed.).
10. Winterson, J. (2019). Frankissstein: A love story. Vintage Digital.