REGULATORY POLICY AND OPTIMIZATION OF INVESTMENT RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN THE MODEL OF FUNCTIONING OF RECREATION INDUSTRY

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Aug 29, 2017

  Hanna Shevchenko

Abstract

The research objective is the rationale of the theoretical and methodical approach concerning the improvement of regulatory policy as well as the process of distribution of financial investments using the model of the functioning of a recreational sector of the national economy. The methodology of the study includes the use of optimal control theory for the model formation of the functioning of the recreational industry as well as determining the behaviour of regulatory authorities and capabilities to optimize the allocation of investment resources in the recreational sector of the national economy. Results. The issue of equilibration of regulatory policy in the recreational sector of the national economy is actualized, including the question of targeted distribution of state and external financial investments. Also, it is proved that regulatory policy should establish the frameworks that on the one hand, do not allow public authorities to exercise extra influence on the economy of recreation, on the other hand, to keep the behaviour of the recreational business entities within the limits of normal socio-economic activity – on the basis of analysis of the continuum “recreation – work” by means of modified Brennan-Buchanan model. It is revealed that even with the condition of the tax reduction, the situation when the population resting less and works more than in the background of a developed economy is observed. However, according to the optimistic forecast, eventually on condition when the economy is emerging from the shade, we will obtain an official mode of the work in which, while maintaining taxes on proposed more advantageous for the population level, ultimately the ratio leisure and work will be established which is corresponding to the principles of sustainable development. Practical value. On the basis of methodical principles of the theory of optimal control, the model of the functioning of the recreational industry under the conditions of transitivity of the national economy is developed, particularly includes a component of the management of investment resources. As a part of the proposed model, the peculiarities of the functioning of the recreational sector as a combination of recreational enterprises are explored as well as the factors of a behaviour of relevant regulatory authorities are analysed that can be used in the practical activities of recreational business entities. Originality. The paper developed a fundamentally new approach to the analysis of the functioning and management of enterprises in the recreational sector on the basis of economic-mathematical modelling using elements of the optimal control theory. The methodological approach to the rationale of the regulatory policy’s role in establishing optimal points on the continuum “recreation – work” is also improved.

How to Cite

Shevchenko, H. (2017). REGULATORY POLICY AND OPTIMIZATION OF INVESTMENT RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN THE MODEL OF FUNCTIONING OF RECREATION INDUSTRY. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 3(1), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-1-109-115
Article views: 300 | PDF Downloads: 136

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

recreational industry, economic regulatory policy, allocation, investment, model, optimal control theory, Ukraine.

References

Bellman, R. (1961). Adaptive control processes: a guided tour. Princeton: Princeton university press, 255 p.

Brennan, G., Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 254 p.

Breton, A. (1974). The economic theory of representative government. London: Macmillan Press, 228 p.

Hadzik, A., Grabara, M. (2014). Investments in recreational and sports infrastructure as a basis for the development of sports tourism on the example of spa municipalities. Polish journal of sport and tourism, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 97–101, doi:10.2478/pjst-2014-0010.

Izmalkov, S., Sonin, K., Yudkevich, M. (2008). Teoriya ekonomicheskikh mekhanizmov. Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 1, pp. 4–26.

Kolupayeva, I. V. (2013). Derzhavna rehulyatorna polityka: sutnist ta pryntsypy formuvannya. Problemy ekonomiky, no. 4, pp. 99–107.

McNutt, P. A. (2002). The economics of public choice. 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 337 p.

Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 768 p.

Moiseev, N. N. (2003). Izbrannye trudy v 2 tomakh. Gidrodinamika I mekhanika. Optimizatsiya, issledovanie operatsiy i teoriya upravleniya. Moskva: Tydex Co, vol. 1, 376 p.

Nureev, R. M. (2005). Teoriya obshchestvennogo vybora. Moskva: Izd. dom GU VShE, 531 p.

Pershyy etap modernizatsiy ekonomiky Ukrayny: dosvid ta problemy (2014); red. V. I. Lyashenko. Zaporizhzhya: KPU, 798 p.

Sonter, L. J., Watson, K. B., Wood, S. A., Ricketts, T. H. (2016). Spatial and temporal dynamics and value of naturebased recreation, estimated via social media. PLoS One, no. 11(9). Retrived from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017630/ doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162372.

Ukrayna u tsyfrakh 2015: stat. zb.; red. I. M. Zhuk (2016). Kyyv: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayny, 239 p.

Zakon Ukrayny ‘Pro zasady derzhavnoy rehulyatornoy polityky u sferi hospodarskoy diyalnosti’ (2004). Vidomosti VRU, no. 9, art. 79.

Zheltukhin, Ye. (2016). “Zarplatnyy” podatok v Ukrayni u 2 razy vyshchyy nizh v Yevropeyskykh kraynakh, – eksperty. Yurydychna gazeta Online. Retrived from: http://yur-gazeta.com/golovna/zarplatniy-podatok-vukrayini-u-2-razi-vishchiy-nizh-v-evropeyskih-krayinah--eksperti.html.