REMOTE EMPLOYMENT: A SHORT-TERM STRATEGY FOR ADAPTING TO THE CRISIS OR THE NEW REALITY OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to explore the use of remote employment as a short-term adaptation strategy for the enterprise in times of crisis and as a long-term strategy for human resource management in the future. The subject of the study is new strategies in human resource management, which began to be widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main focus of the article is on remote employment. Its spread is studied, on the one hand, as an opportunity for companies to adapt to crisis phenomena in the short term, on the other hand, as a long-term strategy in human resource management, which will become a new reality in the management process. Methodology. This article uses a comprehensive approach using the component method and multivariate correlation to analyze the results of public opinion surveys on the introduction of remote employment as a human resource management strategy in an unstable environment and to examine the likelihood of digitalization of labor. Results. An analytical assessment of sociological research on the introduction of remote employment as a strategy for human resource management in conditions of instability was carried out and trends were identified, the main ones for different countries. The probability of digitalization of labor and the use of remote employment for workers with different educational and qualification levels and different professional groups were investigated. The effectiveness of the introduction of new flexible forms of employment and adaptation to remote employment in enterprises was analyzed. It has been proven that the effectiveness and sustainability of the positive results achieved can be maintained with the clear planning of work processes in the enterprise. The practical implications of this study are the optimization of a set of human resource management strategies and remote employment in particular, as well as a radical revision of the format of the work organization. This study was performed as part of the research work of the Department of Finance and Economics of Borys Hrinchenko Kyiv University (№ 0118U001561) on the topic: "Development of the economy of Kyiv in terms of European integration".
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
human resources management, remote employment, digitalization of labor, COVID-19 crisis
Abi Adams-Prassl, Teodora Boneva, Marta Golin, & Christopher Rauh (2020). Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys. Journal of Public Economics, 189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104245
Amin Al-Habaibeh, Matthew Watkins, Kafel Waried, & Maryam Bathaei Javareshk (2021). Challenges and opportunities of remotely working from home during COVID-19 pandemic. Global Transitions, 3, 99–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2021.11.001
Bezrukova, N., & Huk, L. etc. (2022). Digitalization as a Trend of Modern Development of the World Economy. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 18, 120–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.13
Branicki, L., Kalfa, S., & Brammer, S. (2022). Surviving Covid-19: The Role of Human Resource Managers in Shaping Organizational Responses to Societal Paradox. Brit J Manage, 33, 410–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12570
Carmine, S., Andriopoulos, C., & Gotsi, M. et al. (2021). A Paradox Approach to Organizational Tensions During the Pandemic Crisis. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(2), 138–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620986863
Deloitte (2021). Reading allowed: The social enterprise in a world disrupted. Deloitte’s 2021 Global Human Capital Trends report. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/en/pages/about-deloitte/press-releases/gx-2021-global-human-capital-trends-report.html
DGB-Index Gute Arbeit (2021). Reading allowed: Report 2021: Unter Erschwerten Bedingungen – Corona Und Die Arbeitswelt. Available at: https://index-gute-arbeit.dgb.de/++co++034808ca-493c-11ec-99ed-001a4a160123
Giorgi, G., Lecca, L. I., Alessio, F., et al. (2020). COVID-19-Related Mental Health Effects in the Workplace: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217857
Hamouche, S. (2020). COVID-19 and employees’ mental health: stressors, moderators and agenda for organizational actions [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. Emerald Open Res. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13550.1
Hubertus Heil. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales. (2021). SARS-CoV-2-Arbeitsschutzverordnung (Corona-ArbSchV). Veröffentlicht am Freitag, 22. Januar 2021. Available at: https://www.bundesanzeiger.de/pub/publication/5QH1uegEXs2GTWXKeln/content/5QH1uegEXs2GTWXKeln/BAnz%20AT%2022.01.2021%20V1.pdf?inline
Titarenko, H. (2021). Robota.ua Research: Ukrainians are Increasingly Choosing Remote Employment. AGELESS. Available at: https://ageless.com.ua/blog/doslidzhennya-robota-ua-ukrayintsi-dedali-bilshe-obyrayut-viddalenu-zajnyatist/
Jain, N., & Aggarwal, S. (2021). Wellbeing of Employees During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of Innovative HR Practices of Organisations. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 67(4), 573–586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561211057383
Joel, B. Carnevale, & Isabella, Hatak. (2020). Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research, 116, 183–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.037
John J. Horton, Adam Ozimek, Daniel Rock, Garima Sharma, & Hong-Yi TuYe. (2020). COVID-19 and Remote Work: An Early Look at US Data Erik Brynjolfsson. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES. Working Paper 27344. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27344/w27344.pdf
Kazak, O. (2020). The human capital factor's influence on the innovation-investment development of Ukraine in the globalization conditions. Business, innovation, management: problems and perspectives: Coll. of theses. І Internat. scient.-pract. conf., 152–153. Available at: http://confmanagement.kpi.ua/proc/article/view/201328
Pradies, C., Tunarosa, A., Lewis, M. W., & Courtois, J. (2021). From Vicious to Virtuous Paradox Dynamics: The Social-symbolic Work of Supporting Actors. Organization Studies, 42(8), 1241–1263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620907200