Andrii Sukhostavets


Social capital is the basis for the definition of the future concept of rural areas management. Therefore, one of the most important tasks is to determine the various factors of existence, development, and formation of social capital. One of these factors is the security of rural areas and the definition of how social capital affects it. The analysis of the available scientific works in various areas reveals the lack of consensus in the definition of the category “socio-economic security of rural areas”. This is due to the fact that the definition of social and economic security of rural areas is identified with such concepts as the ability to provide resistance to various internal and external environmental influences. The purpose of the study is to determine the nature of social capital, as well as to study its impact on the socio-economic security of the state. The methodology of the research is based on the monographic method, the method of dialectic cognition, the scenario methods used to find the optimal scenario implementation option; SWOT-analysis is used to assess the positive or negative impact of social capital on the socio-economic security of rural areas. Understanding the essence of socio-economic security has led to the conclusion that it consists of economic, social, environmental and other types of security. The term “social security” in the understanding of researchers usually has two interpretations: traditional (absence of threats to the society) and alternative (absence of threats from the society). It is proved that the social security of the region should be focused on ensuring primarily human rights and freedoms, namely, personal, political, social, economic, cultural, environmental, and family ones. Social and economic security should also provide social standards and guarantees, as well as norms. The economic basis of the security of rural areas is manifested in the development of market relations, infrastructure, material and technical base, natural conditions, etc. A market-oriented regional economy does not always ensure the growth of the well-being of all segments of the population in conditions of social and economic stability. Inevitably generated unemployment, social problems and other consequences of the competition can cause social fallout. Social threats are closely related to each other, while one generates another, forming a vicious circle. But at the same time, the socio-economic security of the society should be considered as the primary one. On the basis of the foregoing, we believe that the social capital of rural areas provides the basic social norms of citizens, which results in the provision of rights to communicate, found organizations, unions, cooperatives; and its high level leads directly to the increase in the socio-economic security of rural areas. Directions of our further research will be focused on the development of proposals concerning state support for activities related to the formation of social capital.


capital, social capital, security, socio-economic security.

Full Text:



Antoshkin V.K. (2014). The essence of socio-economic security of the regions and its relation to the national security of the state, Bulletin of the Berdyansk University of Management and Business, No. 3 (27), p. 23-17.

Arefieva O. V. (2001). Scientific fundamentals of formation of economic security of enterprises. Non-state system of business security as a subject of national security of Ukraine: materials of sciences-practice. conf. (Kyiv, May 16-17, 2001), Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine; Europe un - K.: View Europe. Un-th, 2001, p. 49-53.

Baker, W. (1990). Market networks and corporate behavior. – The american Journal of Sociology, Vol. 96, no.3, p. 589-625.

Bourdieu P. (2002). Forms of capital, Economic sociology: electronic journal, Vol. 3, No. 5, p. 60-74.

Vasiliev, O. V., Maita V.I. (2013). Formation of the system of management of economic safety of industrial enterprises. Economic analysis: Sb. sciences works. Ternopil National Economic University; Editorial: SI Shcarban (eds. ed.) and others., Ternopil: Publishing and Printing Center of the Ternopil National Economic University "Economic Thought", 2013, Vol. 14, No. 2, p. 138-145.

Woolcock, M. (1998). Social Capital and Economic Development: Towards a Theoretical Synthesis and a Policy Framework. Theory and Society, № 27(2), р. 151–208.

Coleman J. (2001). Capital is social and human. Social Sciences and the Present, No. 3, p. 122-139.

Krivorotov VV (2011). Economic security of the state and regions – M., Unity-Dana, 352 s.

Patnam rd (2001). Creation of Democracy: Traditions of Civic Activity in Contemporary Italy. – K., Kind of Solomiya Pavlychko "Fundamentals", 302 p.

Slavkova O.P. (2010). Development of rural areas: theory, methodology, practice: monograph. – Sumy, Sumy nats agrar Un-t, 330.

Fukuyama F. (2005). Great collapse: human nature and restoration of social order, Lviv, Calvary, 380 p.

Fukuyama F. (2004). Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity: Trans. with English. – M., LLC "Publishing house ACT": CJSC NPP "Ermak", 730 p.

Schiff, M. (1995). Social Capital, Labor Mobility, and Welfare. Ration Society, Vol. 4, р. 157–175.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.