POLICY ANALYSIS OF HUMAN FACTORS AND SOCIAL INNOVATION IN EU EASI PROGRAMME REPORTS (2015-2022)

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Sep 20, 2024

  Anca Parmena Olimid

  Cătălina Maria Georgescu

  Daniel Alin Olimid

Abstract

Purpose. The Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI), launched by the EU (European Union), represents a financial instrument with the objective of addressing a range of policy analysis areas, as follows: (I) social protection and innovation; (II) social exclusion and social policies; (III) living and working conditions; and (IV) employment, job conditions, mobility, and social entrepreneurship settings under the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+). Objectives. Therefore, the current research aims to structure and analyse in a comparative framework a wide range of EU policies and governance applied to the EaSI reports launched in the period 2015-2022, considering the policy context, key actors, policy content, legal instruments, implementation and governance structures and impact assessment of societal challenges, the role of human factors and the need for social innovation. Methodology. The analysis utilises both quantitative and qualitative methods, building on the comparative legal analysis and developing a triple evaluation: social, economic and political. In order to monitor and review the policy outcomes contained in the EaSI reports, the current study will use the Text-Based Diagramming of the programme Mermaid v10.9.0 Live Editor. Results and findings. The results of the analysis will evaluate and measure the extent to which the three EaSI reports launched in the period 2015-2022 have met the requirements of social innovation by assessing the policy and governance implementation mechanisms and tracking the relevance of two determinants: EU societal challenges and human factors. Conclusion. The framework of the EaSI reports provides the evaluation findings on multi-level policy and strategy approaches and summarises the findings and broader perspectives of the three reports on the effectiveness of social innovation governance. The research findings highlight the societal challenges in the EU, the interdisciplinary circumstances and the evidence-based interplay between the policy framework and the adaptability of multi-level governance.

How to Cite

Parmena Olimid, A., Maria Georgescu, C., & Alin Olimid, D. (2024). POLICY ANALYSIS OF HUMAN FACTORS AND SOCIAL INNOVATION IN EU EASI PROGRAMME REPORTS (2015-2022). Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 10(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-3-1-9
Article views: 342 | PDF Downloads: 203

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

society, EU, human factors, social innovation, policies

References

Avelino, F., Dumitru, A., Cipolla, C., Kunze, I., & Wittmayer, J. (2019). Translocal empowerment in transformative social innovation networks. European Planning Studies, Vol. 28(5), p. 955–977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1578339

Ballie, J., Bruce, F., McGowan, S., & Johnstone, L. (2022). Socially Connected Cities by Design: A Design Toolkit for Evaluating Social Impact. Design Manag J, Vol. 17, p. 65–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmj.12078

Baranowski, M. (2013). Between Social Control and Conflict: An Analytical Framework for Social Movements. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, Vol. 47, p. 5–16.

Cairns, G. (2017). Can Design Inform Effective Social Innovation? The Design Journal, Vol. 20(6), p. 725–734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1370658

Caridà, A., Colurcio, M., & Melia, M. (2022). Digital platform for social innovation: Insights from volunteering. Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 31(4), p. 755–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12499

Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E., & Androutsopoulou, A. (2014). Fostering Social Innovation through Multiple Social Media Combinations. Information Systems Management, Vol. 31(3), p. 225–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923267

EaSI Report (2015-2016) (2017). Performance Monitoring Report of the European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) 2015-2016, Directorate-General for Employment. Social Affairs and Inclusion Report Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2767/438208

EaSI Report (2017-2018) (2020). Performance Monitoring Report of the European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) 2017-2018, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2767/438208

EaSI Report (2019-2020) (2022). Performance Monitoring Report of the European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) 2019-2020, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (EU) Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2022. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=25958&langId=en

El-Haddadeh, R., Irani, Z., Millard, J., & Schröder, A. (2014). Toward a Coherent Methodological Framework for Examining Social Innovation in the Public Sector. Information Systems Management, Vol. 31(3), p. 250–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923269

Eseonu, T. (2021). Co-creation as social innovation: including ‘hard-to-reach’ groups in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, Vol. 42(5), p. 306–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981057

Gallouj, F., Rubalcaba, L., Toivonen, M., & Windrum, P. (2018). Understanding social innovation in services industries. Industry and Innovation, Vol. 25(6), p. 551–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1419124

Georgescu C.M., Olimid A.P., & Gherghe C.L. (2022). Euro-Atlantic Security and Institutional Resilience: Analyzing the Conceptual Use and Topical Variations. Revista de Științe Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques, Vol. 74, p. 82–96. 1584-224X. Available at: https://cis01.ucv.ro/revistadestiintepolitice/files/numarul74_2022/8.pdf

Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2017). Social Innovation and Human Development—How the Capabilities Approach and Social Innovation Theory Mutually Support Each Other. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 18(2), p. 163–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1251401

Jalonen, H. (2021). Complexity-informed interpretation of social innovation. Public Money & Management, Vol. 42(5), p. 356–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981039

Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2014). Developing Multi-Layer Information Infrastructures: Advancing Social Innovation through Public–Private Governance. Information Systems Management, Vol. 31(3), p. 240–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923268

Meister Broekema, P., Horlings, L. G., & Bulder, E. (2022). Tackling societal challenges together: Co-creation strategies and social innovation in EU policy and funded projects. European Policy Analysis, Vol. 8, p. 68–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1133

Moore, M. L., Westley, F. R., & Brodhead, T. (2012). Social Finance Intermediaries and Social Innovation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Vol. 3(2), p. 184–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2012.726020

Olimid, A. P. & Olimid, D. A. (2023). On State-Society Relations: Findings in EU Legislation on Information Society, Human Determinants and Social Data using IRAC Method (2000-2019). Revista de Științe Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques, Vol. 78, p. 60–67. https://cis01.ucv.ro/revistadestiintepolitice/files/numarul78_2023/5.pdf

Olimid, A. P., Georgescu, C. M., & Gherghe, C. L. (2022). Influences of Covid-19 Crisis on Resilience Theories: An analysis of Community, Societal and Governance Resilience. Revista de Științe Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques, Vol. 73, p. 38–51. https://cis01.ucv.ro/revistadestiintepolitice/files/numarul73_2022/4.pdf

Olimid, A. P., Georgescu, C. M., & Gherghe, C. L. (2023). Integrated Analysis of Sixty Democracy Governance and Policy Reform Topics using Ngram Tool for Google Platform (1990-2019). Revista de Științe Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques, Vol. 78, p. 126–138. https://cis01.ucv.ro/revistadestiintepolitice/files/numarul78_2023/11.pdf

Peiró-Palomino, J. (2019). The geography of social capital and innovation in the European Union. Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 98, p. 53–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12337

Pellicer-Sifres, V., Belda-Miquel, S., López-Fogués, A., & Boni Aristizábal, A. (2017). Grassroots Social Innovation for Human Development: An Analysis of Alternative Food Networks in the City of Valencia (Spain). Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 18(2), p. 258–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1270916

Sánchez Rodríguez, A. M., MacLachlan, M., & Brus, A. (2021). The coordinates of scaling: Facilitating inclusive innovation. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 38(6), p. 833–850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2740

Schartinger, D., Rehfeld, D., Weber, M., & Rhomberg, W. (2019). Green social innovation – towards a typology. European Planning Studies, Vol. 28(5), p. 1026–1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1677564

Schmidthuber, L., Piller, F., Bogers, M. & Hilgers, D. (2019), Citizen participation in public administration: investigating open government for social innovation. R&D Management, Vol. 49, p. 343–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12365

Silva-Flores, M. L., & Murillo, D. (2022). Ecosystems of Innovation: Factors of Social Innovation and its Role in Public Policies. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol. 35(4), p. 569–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2069548

Tagliapietra, S. (2024). The European Union's Global Gateway: An institutional and economic overview. The World Economy, Volume 47, Issue 4, p. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13551

Terstriep, J., Rehfeld, D., & Kleverbeck, M. (2020). Favourable social innovation ecosystem(s)? – An explorative approach. European Planning Studies, Vol. 28(5), p. 881–905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1708868

Terstriep, J., & Rehfeld, D. (2020). Bridging local embeddedness and global dynamics – the economics of social innovation. European Planning Studies, Vol. 28:5, p. 853–863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1766106.

Thompson, M. (2019). Playing with the Rules of the Game: Social Innovation for Urban Transformation. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., Vol. 43, p. 1168–1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12663

Unceta, A., Castro-Spila, J., & García Fronti, J. (2016). Social innovation indicators. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol. 29(2), p. 192–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1127137

Unceta, A., Luna, Á., Castro, J., & Wintjes, R. (2019). Social Innovation Regime: an integrated approach to measure social innovation. European Planning Studies, Vol. 28(5), p. 906–924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1578338

Voegtlin, C., Scherer, A.G., Stahl, G.K. & Hawn, O. (2022), Grand Societal Challenges and Responsible Innovation. J. Manage. Stud., Vol. 59, p. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12785

von Jacobi, N., Edmiston, D., & Ziegler, R. (2017). Tackling Marginalisation through Social Innovation? Examining the EU Social Innovation Policy Agenda from a Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 18(2), p. 148–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1256277

von Jacobi, N., Chiappero-Martinetti, E., Maestripieri, L., & Giroletti, T. (2023). Creating social value by empowering people: a social innovation perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Volume 95, Issue 2, p. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12447

Wirth, S., Tschumi, P., Mayer, H., & Bandi Tanner, M. (2023). Change agency in social innovation: an analysis of activities in social innovation processes. Regional Studies, Regional Science, Vol. 10(1), p. 33–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2022.2157324