FISCAL ASPECTS OF ESG BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The subject of the study is the fiscal aspects of the ESG concept of business development. Methodology. The study uses general scientific methods, in particular, theoretical generalisation, methods of analysis and synthesis and statistical analysis, as well as the graphical method to visualise the results of the study. The purpose of the study is to analyse the strategic guidelines of tax policy through the prism of the ESG concept. Conclusion. The fiscal aspects of the ESG concept are an important element in understanding its impact on business. They include various tax incentives and mechanisms that promote the implementation of ESG standards and take into account the consequences of non-compliance for businesses. In particular, fiscal policy includes tax incentives for businesses that invest in green development, support social initiatives or improve corporate governance. In a broad sense, instruments such as environmental taxes are aimed at achieving sustainable growth and economic development. Strategic tax policy guidelines under the ESG approach include encouraging investment in sustainable technologies through tax incentives for companies investing in renewable energy and environmentally friendly projects. Social initiatives are supported through tax rebates for companies that develop programmes to develop local communities and improve working conditions. Corporate governance regulations require companies to report on the environmental, social and governance aspects of their activities. Promoting the circular economy includes tax incentives for companies that implement recycling and waste reduction practices. Support for small and medium-sized businesses includes tax incentives for SMEs that implement ESG standards and easier access to green finance. International cooperation involves bringing tax policy in line with international ESG standards and participating in global tax transparency initiatives. Adaptation to climate change includes the introduction of taxes on greenhouse gas emissions and the transition to low-carbon business models. Green project financing involves the use of tax revenues to support green initiatives. Innovations in tax administration are being introduced through new technologies, and education and training include funding for ESG training programmes. These guidelines will help businesses adapt to new conditions, create sustainable value and meet modern environmental, social and governance requirements.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
ESG concept, fiscal policy, taxes, taxation, climate change, sustainable development
Bird, R., & Davis-Nozemack, K. (2018). Tax avoidance as a sustainability problem. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 151(4), р. 1009–1025.
Irtyshcheva, I., Kramarenko, I., & Romanenko, S. (2022). Systematic approaches to ensuring the strategic development of the sports and recreation sector. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 8(4), p. 90–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-4-90-95
BoHyun, Y., Jeong-Hwan, L., & Jin-Hyung, Ch. (2021). The Effect of ESG Performance on Tax Avoidance-Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, Vol. 13, р. 6729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126729
Col, B., & Patel, S. (2016). Going to haven? Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance. SpringerLink, Vol. 54(4), р. 1033–1050.
Davis, A., Guenther, D., Krull, L., & Williams, B. (2016). Do socially responsible firms pay more taxes? The accounting review, Vol. 91(1), р. 47–68.
Garazha, O., Shyian, D., Cherneha, I., Burliai, A., Zharun, O., & Blenda, N. (2021). Conceptual changes of fiscal regulation of agricultural land use: international experience and Ukrainian practice. Economic Annals-XXI, Vol. 192(7-8(2)), р. 63–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V192-06
Guenther, D., Matsunaga, S., & Williams, B. (2013). Tax avoidance, tax aggressiveness, tax risk and firm risk. Oregon : University of Oregon. 42 p.
Hardeck, I., & Kirn, T. (2016). Taboo or technical issue? An empirical assessment of taxation in sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 133, р. 1337–1351.
Harnesk, J., & Myhrberg, A. (2019). Sustainable tax planning investigating the relationship between ESG and tax aggressiveness. Umea: Umea school of business, economics and statistics. 75 p. Available at: http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1327432/fulltext01.pdf
Impact & ESG Performance Report. 2022. Available at: https://www.energyimpactpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/EIP-2022-Impact-ESG-Report.pdf
Ivanov, Y., Ivanova, O., Poliakova, O., Shlykova, V., & Laptiev, V. (2022). Methodology of determining priority directions for stimulating the development of territorial communities on the basis of fiscal decentralization. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, Vol. 6(47), р. 242–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.47.2022.3920
Kolupaieva, I., Sheiko, I., & Polozova, T. (2024). Digital Transformation in the Context of Sustainable Development of European Countries. Problemy Ekorozwoju, Vol. 19(1), р. 89–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5413
Lagodiyenko, O., Lagodiienko, V., Ivanchenkova, L., Romanashenko, I., & Laskaiev, O. (2023). Prospects for the development of the esg concept in the face of new challenges. Collection of papers new economy, Vol. 1 (1), p. 179–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61432/CPNE0101179l
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2014). Is corporate social responsibility performance associated with tax avoidance? Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 127(2), р. 439–457.
Osman, I., & Rodrigues, L. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and corporate tax aggressiveness: a scientometric analysis of the existing literature to map the future. Sustainability, Vol. 13(11), р. 6225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116225
Rohov, H., Kolodiziev, O., Yehorycheva, S., Krupka, I., & Zaplatynskyi, M. (2024). Factors influencing the multinational banks’ decisions to curtail operations in russia: Does ESG matter? Banks and Bank Systems, Vol. 19(1), р. 135–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(1).2024.12
Sapitri, M. (2020). The influence of tax aggressiveness on corporate social responsibility. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, Vol. 8, р. 44–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.Vol8.Iss1.2063
Stepanenko, S., Kuzoma, V., & Tymoshenko, K. (2023). Current state and directions of further circular agricultural economy development in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 9(4), р. 223–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-4-223-233
Xiaoling, Y., & Kaitian, X. (2022). Does ESG Performance Affect Firm Value? Evidence from a New ESG-Scoring Approach for Chinese Enterprises. Sustainability, Vol. 14(24), р. 1–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416940
Popadynets, N., Irtyshcheva, I., Yakhno, T., Diugowanets, O., Yakubiv, V., Kramarenko, I., Sala, D., Stehnei, M., Zapukhlyak, V., & Nahirna, N. (2024). Evaluating the capacity of the domestic food market in Ukraine in the pre-war period. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Vol. 46(1), p. 93–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2024.10
Kramarenko, I. et al. (2022). Socio-economic development in conditions of digital transformations: regional features, strategic analysis, and prospects. 7th International Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sciences and Industry (MCSI), Athens, Greece, p. 175–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSI55933.2022.00035
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.