FORECASTING THE RISKS OF UNCONTROLLED DEFORESTATION IN UKRAINE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The forestry sector in Ukraine is currently confronted with a multitude of challenges, including the repercussions of climate change, ecological issues, economic challenges, and the consequences of military actions initiated by the Russian Federation, which have caused extensive damage to forests across the country. This highlights the necessity for research aimed at assessing threats and risks in the forestry sector, as well as evaluating the institutional capacity to ensure the sustainable development of the industry. The research was conducted in accordance with the mandate of the Temporary Investigative Commission of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, which was established to examine instances of malfeasance and non-compliance with environmental safety standards in the domain of environmental protection. The methodology of this study is based on a risk-based approach that involves a systematic analysis of threats affecting the forest sector in Ukraine and an assessment of their impact on environmental safety. The principal instrument for data collection was an online survey of experts drawn from a range of sectors, including government agencies, local communities, research institutes, non-governmental organisations and businesses. The data was subjected to statistical analysis, including correlation and regression analysis, which enabled an assessment of the relationship between the level of threats and institutional capacity. The aim of this article is twofold: firstly, to identify the principal threats and risks facing Ukraine's forestry sector; and secondly, to evaluate the extent of the institutional capacity to mitigate these threats. The study identified 153 indicators that characterise threats and 102 indicators that describe the institutional capacity of the sector. Following preliminary analysis and data cleansing, a high-quality sample was constructed based on expert assessments, which helped to avoid logical errors and enhance the reliability of the results. The results of the study indicate that uncontrolled mass deforestation represents one of the most significant environmental threats, resulting in a reduction in the population of flora and fauna. The probability of this threat materialising was calculated to be 60.89%. The correlation and regression analysis showed that out of 102 indicators of institutional capacity, only 14 have a significant correlation with the threat of uncontrolled logging, and all 11 vulnerability indicators showed a statistically significant relationship with this threat. The key factors affecting the reduction of the risk associated with these threats are the level of bureaucratic obstacles in the performance of official duties by forestry employees and the level of bureaucracy in the provision of services to the public. The findings of the study indicate a relatively low level of institutional capacity within Ukraine's forestry sector. This suggests a need to improve management processes in order to reduce risks in this area. The recommendations developed based on the obtained data can be employed to devise strategic measures to guarantee environmental safety and the sustainable development of Ukraine's forestry sector.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
forest, threat, risk, uncontrolled mass deforestation, risk assessment, risk-oriented approach, institutional capacity, regression analysis
Allen C. D., Macalady A. K., Chenchouni H. Bachelet D., McDowell N., Vennetier M., Kitzberger T., Rigling A., Breshears D. D., Hogg E. H., Gonzalez P., Fensham R., Zhang Z., Castro J., Demidova N., Lim J.-H., Allard G., Running S. W., Semerci A. & Cobb N. (2010). A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For. Ecol. Managem. 259: 660–684.
Babst F., Bouriaud O., Poulter B., Trouet V., Giraddin M.P. & Frank D.C. (2019). Twentieth century redistribution in climatic drivers of global tree growth. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat4313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4313
Beck U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bennett B.M. & Barton G.A. (2018). The enduring link between forest cover and rainfall: a historical perspective on science and policy discussions. Forest Ecosyst. 5, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-017-0124-9
Berk R. (2017). An impact assessment of machine learning risk forecasts on parole board decisions and recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology 13(2): 193–216.
Berk R. (2018). Machine Learning Risk Assessments in Criminal Justice Settings. New York: Springer.
Berk R. (2021). Artificial Intelligence, Predictive Policing, and Risk Assessment in Law Enforcement. Annual Review of Criminology 4: 209–237.
Birky A.K. (2001). NDVI and a simple model of deciduous forest seasonal dynamics. Ecol. Modell. 143: 43–58.
Bohn T.J., Livneh B., Oyler J.W., Running S.W., Nijssen B. & Lettenmaier D.P. (2013). Global evaluation of MTCLIM and related algorithms for forcing of ecological and hydrological models. Agric. For. Meteorol. 176: 38–49.
Bonan G.B. (2008). Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits. Science 320: 1444–1449.
Bright R.M., Anton-Fernandez C., Astrup R., Cherubini F., Kvalevåg M. & Stromman A. H. (2014). Climate change implications of shifting forest management strategy in a boreal forest ecosystem of Norway. Global Change Biol. 20: 607–621.
Canadell J.G. & Raupach M.R. (2008). Managing forests for Climate Change mitigation. Science 320: 1456–1457.
Cao J., Tian H., Adamowski, J.F., Zhang X. & Cao Z. (2018). Influences of afforestation policies on soil moisture content in China’s arid and semi-arid regions. Land Use Policy 75: 449–458.
Chiang Ku Fan, Chen-Mei Fan Chiang & Tong Liang Kao. (2012). Risk Management Strategies for the Use of Cloud Computing. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security 4(12): 50–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2012.12.05
Dubber W., Eklundh L. & Lagergren F. 2017. Comparing field inventory with mechanistic modelling and light-use efficiency modelling based approaches for estimating forest net primary productivity at a regional level. Boreal Env. Res. 22: 337–352.
Environmental catastrophe in Ukraine: war damage has already amounted to more than 56 billion euros. Available at: https://kyivschina24.com/news/ekologichna-katastrofa-v-ukrayini-zbytky-vid-vijny-vzhe-sklaly-ponad-55-mlrd-yevro/
Faiza Ayub Syed, Kokub Sultan & Ali Javed. (2013). An Enhanced Action Research Approach for Managing Risks in Software Process Improvement. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science 5 (6): 24–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2013.06.04
Favero A., Sohngen B., Huang Y. & Jin Y. (2018). Global cost estimation of forest mitigation with albedo: a new integrative policy approach. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 125002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaeaa2
Galbraith D., Levy P.E., Sitch S., Huntingford C., Cox P., Williams M. & Meir P. (2010). Multiple mechanisms of Amazonian forest biomass losses in three dynamic global vegetation models under climate change. New Phytol. 187: 647–665.
Gede Ary Suta Sanjaya, Gusti Made Arya Sasmita & Dewa Made Sri Arsa (2020). Information Technology Risk Management Using ISO 31000 Based on ISSAF Framework Penetration Testing (Case Study: Election Commission of X City). International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security 12 (4): 30–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2020.04.03
Goldammer P., Annen H., Stöckli P.L. & Jonas, K. (2020). Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies. The Leadership Quarterly 31 (4): 101384.
ISO 31000:2018 – RISK MANAGEMENT. Available at: https://www.iso.org/ru/publication/PUB100464.html
Jackson R., Randerson J.T., Canadell J.G., Anderson R.G., Avissar R., Baldocchi D.D., Bonan G.B., Caldeira K., Diffenbaugh N.S., Field C.B., Hungate B.A., Jobbagy E.G., Kkueppers L.M., Nosetto M.D. & Pataki D.E. (2008). Protecting climate with forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 3, 44006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044006
Kasliono, Suprapto & Faizal Makhrus (2021). Point Based Forecasting Model of Vehicle Queue with Extreme Learning Machine Method and Correlation Analysis. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications 13 (3): 11–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2021.03.02
Kollo J., Metslaid S., Padari A., Hordo M., Kangur A. & Noe S.M. (2023). Trends in thermal growing season length from years 1955–2020 - A case study in hemiboreal forest in Estonia. Boreal Env. Res. 28: 169–180.
Kolström M. & Pitkänen S. (1999). Effect of forest management on alpha diversity of ground vegetation in boreal forests: a model approach. Boreal Env. Res. 4: 45–54. ISSN 1239-6095.
Korystin О. (2023). Institutional Capacity in Forestry. Nauka i pravookhorona. 3 (61): 71–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36486/np.2023.3(61)
Korystin О. & Svyrydiuk N. (2020). Methodological principles of risk assessment in law enforcement activity. Nauka i pravooxoronna 3: 191–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36486/np.2020349
Korystin O. & Svyrydiuk N. (2021). Activities of Illegal Weapons Criminal Component of Hybrid Threats. Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Law and Education Research (ELER 2021). Series: Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. 170 (22 March): 86–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210320.016
Korystin O. & Svyrydiuk N. (2023a). Assessment of threats in forestry of Ukraine. Nauka i pravookhoronna 1: 145–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36486/np.2023.1(59).16
Korystin O. & Svyrydiuk N. (2023b). A risk-oriented approach to the assessment of threats in the field of forestry. Nauka i pravookhoronna 2 (60): 194–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36486/np.2023.2(60).20
Korystin O., Svyrydiuk N. & Tkachenko V. (2021a). Fiscal Security of the State Considering Threats of Macroeconomic Nature. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business, Accounting, Management, Banking, Economic Security and Legal Regulation Research (BAMBEL2021). Series: Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. 188 (27 August): 65–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/AEBMR.K.210826.012
Korystin O., Svyrydiuk N. & Vinogradov A. (2021b). The Use of Sociological Methods in Criminological Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Science, Psychology and Legal Regulation (SPL 2021). Series: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 617 (18 December): 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211218.001
Korystin O., Kardashevskyy Y. & Baskov V. (2024). Risk assessment of economic organized crime in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 10 (1): 122–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-1-122-135
Kulmala M., Ezhova E., Kalliokoski T., Noe S., Vesala T., Lohila A., Liski J., Makkonen R., Bäck J., Petäjä T. & Kerminen V.-M. (2020). CarbonSink+ — Accounting for multiple climate feedbacks from forests. Boreal Env. Res. 25: 145–159.
Lampilahti A., Garmash O., Arshinov M., Davydov D., Belan B., Noe S., Komsaare K., Vana M., Junninen, H., Bianchi F., Lampilahti J., Dada L., Kerminen V.-M., Petäjä T., Kulmala M., & Ezhova E. (2023). New particle formation in boreal forests of Siberia, Finland and Estonia. Boreal Env. Res. 28: 147–167.
Li X., Li H., Yao L., Stolzenburg D., Sarnela N., Vettikkat L., de Jonge R.W., Baalbaki R., Uusitalo H., Kontkanen J., Lehtipalo K., Daellenback K.R., Jokinen T., Aalto J., Keronen P., Schobesberger S., Nieminen T., Petäjä T., Kerminen V.-M., Bianchi F., Kulmala M. & Dada L. (2024). Over 20 years of observations in the boreal forest reveal a decreasing trend of atmospheric new particle formation. Boreal Env. Res. 29: 25–52.
Luhmann N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp. Frankfurt am Main.
Muukkonen P., Nevalainen S., Lindgren M. & Peltoniemi M. (2015). Spatial occurrence of drought-associated damages in Finnish boreal forests: results from forest condition monitoring and GIS analysis. Boreal Env. Res. 20: 172–180.
Peltoniemi M., Markkanen T., Härkönen S., Muukkonen P., Thum T., Aalto T. & Mäkelä A. (2015). Consistent estimates of gross primary production of Finnish forests — comparison of estimates of two process models. Boreal Env. Res. 20: 196–212.
Peltoniemi M., Pulkkinen M., Aurela M., Pumpanen J., Kolari P. & Mäkelä A. (2015). A semi-empirical model of boreal-forest gross primary production, evapotranspiration, and soil water – calibration and sensitivity analysis. Boreal Env. Res. 20: 151–171.
RamaKoteswara Rao Alla, G.L Pahuja & J.S Lather. (2015). Risk Based Ranking Using Component Cost Importance Measure. IJEM 5 (1): 26–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijem.2015.01.03
Shahrel M. Z., Mutalib S. & Shuzlina Abdul-Rahman (2021). PriceCop–Price Monitor and Prediction Using Linear Regression and LSVM-ABC Methods for E-commerce Platform. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business 13 (1): 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2021.01.01
Spracklen D., Bonn B. & Carslaw K.S. (2008). Boreal forests, aerosols and the impacts on clouds and climate. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0201
Teuling A.J., Taylor C.M., Meirink J.F., Melsen L.A., Miralles D.G., van Heerwaarden C.C., Vautard R., Stegehuis A.I., Nabuurs G.-J. & de Arellano J.V.-G. (2017). Observational evidence for cloud cover enhancement over western European forests. Nature Comm. 8, 14065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14065
Tharammal T., Bala G., Devaraju N. & Nemani R. (2019). A review of the major drivers of the terrestrial carbon uptake: model-based assessments, consensus, and uncertainties. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 093005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3012
Zibtsev S.V., Soshenskyi O.M., Holdammer Y.H., Myroniuk V.V., Borsuk O.A., Humeniuk V.V., Mieshkova V.L., Vasyliuk O.V. & Buksha I.F. (2022). Lisoupravlinnia na terytoriiakh, zabrudnenykh vybukhonebezpechnymy predmetamy. WWF-Ukraina. Available at: https://nubip.edu.ua/sites/default/files/u184/wwf_a4_6__0.pdf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.