DIGITAL MEDIATION TOOLS IN RESOLVING SOCIAL CONFLICTS WITHIN THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
This study examines the use of digital mediation tools to resolve social conflicts within the public administration system, emphasising their growing importance in the context of the global digital transformation of governance. The research focuses on the integration of online platforms, artificial intelligence technologies and digital communication formats into public governance mechanisms for resolving conflicts. The primary aim of the research is threefold: to assess the effectiveness of digital mediation tools; to determine the level of trust in these mechanisms; and to propose a methodological framework for their evaluation, with a particular focus on the Ukrainian context during wartime recovery and governance decentralisation. In order to achieve these objectives, the authors employed a comprehensive research methodology that includes comparative analysis, content analysis, sociological surveys, and mathematical modelling. The comparative analysis focused on international experiences from countries such as Estonia, Germany, Canada, Singapore, and Ukraine, with a view to identifying best practices in digital mediation implementation. A content analysis of digital platforms was conducted to assess functionality, interactivity, and usability. A sociological survey was conducted, with 200 respondents including public officials, local community members, and mediators. The aim of the survey was to capture perceptions regarding trust, accessibility, and barriers to participation. The development of three key indices was enabled by mathematical modelling: the Index of Digital Mediation Accessibility (IDM), the Index of Digital Mediation Effectiveness (IEM), and the Index of Stakeholder Satisfaction (ISM). Collectively, these indices form a Composite Digital Mediation Index (CEM), the purpose of which is to quantify overall effectiveness. The findings indicate that digital mediation is gaining traction in public administration, facilitating transparent dialogue, broader participation, and efficient conflict resolution processes. In Ukraine, the VzaemoDIA platform and other online consultation tools have become instrumental in fostering civic engagement, particularly in regions affected by conflict or remote communities. The Composite Index calculated in the study indicated an 75% effectiveness rate, with the highest performance recorded in the stakeholder satisfaction component (83%). These results indicate that Ukrainian society is prepared to adopt digital conflict resolution tools, although there is a necessity for consideration of digital inequality, digital literacy, and data security. The study concludes that, although digital mediation cannot replace traditional methods entirely, it is a vital addition to modern governance, particularly in times of crisis. To maximise impact, policy measures should prioritise integration with broader e-governance systems, as well as providing training for public officials and citizens, developing cybersecurity infrastructure, and legally regulating online mediation processes. This study makes a valuable contribution to academic discourse by proposing a replicable evaluation framework and offering insights into Ukraine's distinctive experience of managing digital conflicts during wartime.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
digital mediation, social conflicts, public administration, digital platforms, effectiveness index, online consultations
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Criado, J. I., & Villodre, J. (2020). Delivering public services through social media in European local governments. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 482-493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13167
Meijer, A. J. (2018). Public value management and the responsiveness of government. Public Management Review, 20(5), 682–699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1320047
Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2018). A framework for social media use in e-government: Reviewing the literature. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 704–712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.07.003
Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019). The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1665–1686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619807
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(1987), 20120382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
Zavattaro, S. M., French, P. E., & Mohanty, S. D. (2015). Social media governance: Towards a framework for local government. American Review of Public Administration, 45(6), 657–674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013504128
Meijer, A. (2015). Government transparency in historical perspective: From the ancient regime to open data in the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(3), 189–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.934837
Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003
Janssen, M., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Big and open linked data (BOLD) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy? Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 363–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.002
Rubryka. (2024, May 28). 78% of Ukrainians trust government e-services. Rubryka. Available at: https://rubryka.com/article/derzhavnyh-elektronnyh-poslug/
Shamanska, I. (2021). Trust in online media during the COVID-19 pandemic. Open Data, (9), 74-86. Available at: https://ela.kpi.ua/bitstream/123456789/46395/1/OD-2021-9_s74-86.pdf
World Bank. (2021). Digital transformation in Ukraine: Challenges and opportunities. World Bank Group. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099845123212135259/pdf/P1748170aa0f800b5092f707495ce36a5fa.pdf
Meijer, A. (2015). Government transparency in historical perspective: From the ancient regime to open data in the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(3), 189-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.934837
Lopatchenko, I. M. (2019). Mediation as a modern technology in resolving conflicts in public administration. Law and Public Administration, (2), 231–235.
Maistrenko, K. M. (2023). Mediation as a modern technology for conflict resolution in public administration system. Investments: Practice and Experience, (5), 120–123.
Stadniichuk, R. (2024). The role of digital technologies in enhancing the effectiveness of public policy mechanisms for social conflict management in Ukraine. Bulletin of Khmelnytskyi National University. Series: Economic Sciences, 326(1), 183–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30838/ep.198.253-257
Kuziv, M. I. (2020). The role of mediation in conflict resolution. Collection of Scientific Works of V. H. Korolenko Pereiaslav National Pedagogical University, (10), 85–89.
Semeniuk, O. V. (2018). Mediation as an alternative method of conflict resolution and its prospects in Ukraine. Young Scientist, (4), 171–174.
Havryliuk, O. M. (2021). Introduction of mediation as a mechanism for conflict resolution resulting from military actions in eastern Ukraine. Public Administration and Regional Development, (5), 92–97.
Semeniuk, O. V. (2024). Online mediation as an instrument for resolving conflicts among refugees and internally displaced persons amid full-scale war in Ukraine. Law and Public Administration, (3), 123–128.
Romanenko, Ye. O. (2023). Mechanism of mediation in the system of public administration. Public Administration: Theory and Practice, (2), 45–50.
Yankovoi, R., Stadniichuk, R., Zhosan, H., Garafonova, O., Biriukov, I. (2024). Innovative transformation of a financial institution in the context of digitalisation and its impact on social conflict management. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(55), 75–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.2.55.2024.4386

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.