INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE’S ECONOMY: CONCEPTUAL PRINCIPLES AND PROVISIONS OF EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
innovative economy, innovation, transitive economy, economic development, competitiveness.
Aghion P., Akcigit U., & Howitt P. (2015). Lessons from Schumpeterian growth theory. American Economic Review, no. 105(5), pp. 94-99.
Ahlstrom D. (2010). Innovation and Growth: How Business Contributes to Society. Academy of Management Perspectives, no. 24 (3), pp. 11-24.
Bohashko, O. L. (2013). The evolution of theoretical approaches to innovation development in the economic science. Bulletin of Berdyansk University of Management and Business, vol. 2, no. 22, pp. 23-29.
Borrás S. (2016). Organisations in Innovation Systems: Entrepreneurship, Intrapreneurship and Public Policy. DBP Working Papers. Copenhagen, Department of Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School. vol. 19.
Borrás S. and C. Edquist. (2013). The Choice of Inovation Policy Instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, no. 80(8), pp.1513-1522
Borrás S. and C. Edquist. (2015). Education, Training and Skills in Innovation Policy. Science and Public Policy, no. 42(2), pp. 215-227.
Brisbane City Council. (2013). Digital Brisbane: A strategy for a digitally driven economy. Available at: http://www.brisbanemarketing.com.au/Business/Digital-Brisbane/pages/Digital-Strategies.aspx
Capello R. and C. Lenzi, Eds. (2013). Territorial Patterns of Innovation. An Inquiry on the Knowledge Economy in European Regions. London, Routledge.
Dyer-Witheford N. (2014). The global worker and the digital front. In C. Fuchs & M. Sandoval, eds. Critique, social media and the information society. New York: Routledge.
Edquist C. and J. M. Zabala‐Iturriagagoitia. (2015). The Innovation Union Scoreboard is flawed: The Case of Sweden – not the innovation leader of the EU. C. W. P. N., vol. 2015/27.