THE IMPACT OF TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND TECHNOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIGITAL PRODUCTION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND THE ECONOMY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The purpose of scientific research is to establish cause-and-effect relationships between technical progress and technological improvement, and the acceleration of the digitalisation of entrepreneurship. It also involves searching for reserves for the digitalisation of business projects that affect production efficiency and the effectiveness of the country's economy. The object of scientific research is the field of knowledge and technology, existing patents and utility models, and scientific and technical articles, analysed in the context of groups of countries by income level. This analysis includes an evaluation of rating indicators and the GII, as well as the expansion of digital opportunities for entrepreneurship, based on existing human capital. The implementation of inventions, utility models and ideas produced by this capital is one of the key drivers of innovative and digital economic development. Methodology. Using dialectical and systemic methods, the impact of technical and technological progress on the movement of the production function curve in digital enterprises was investigated. This revealed a promising reserve of existing innovation with positive dynamics, highlighting the need for a strategic approach to the digitalisation of entrepreneurship. The concretisation method was employed to develop the author's proposals for innovation and the digitalisation of the country's economy. Rsults. The factors that determine the quality and efficiency of a digital enterprise are presented, including harmonisation of costs associated with developing innovative products and digital services, network effects, the growing importance of big data and analytics, resource availability, digital infrastructure, consumption dynamics and working with clients. Analysed statistical data showed that, for post-industrial countries with an innovative approach and a digital strategy, "healthy" competition stimulates digital development as businesses strive to provide higher-quality innovative products and digital services. The findings of the research conducted allowed the assertion to be made that digital entrepreneurship is both the result and the source of continuous scientific and technical achievements, inventions and ideas. Furthermore, the digital changes taking place in its work are based on new technologies that are constantly produced by the scientific world. Practical implications. The dissemination of practical advice has been undertaken, with the objective of maintaining positive dynamics in terms of accelerating innovation and digitalisation of national economies at both the macro and micro levels. Measures to promote the digitisation of traditional entrepreneurship are outlined, including the establishment of scientific, production, research and experimental digital ecosystems based on the country's leading industry-focused universities, and the development and implementation of youth scientific support programmes lasting three, five and seven years, under the names "Youth in Research", "Innovations and Young Researchers", and "Youth. Inventions. Progress". Hold events in leading scientific and technical laboratories under the names "Week of Innovations and Inventions", "Week of Science and Technology" and "Week of the Researcher, Innovator and Inventor". Every science needs individual researchers, inventors and innovators. In the innovation-digital process, the innovator who produces the invention is therefore a valuable "player" and a key link. Value/Originality. After conducting a thorough analysis of the Global Innovation Index ratings by country group and income level, the authors found that China leads the group of countries with above-average incomes in terms of the number of patents and utility models. The leaders of the "Labour and Technology Results" index in terms of knowledge creation remain the three high-income countries of Sweden, Switzerland and the USA. Analysis of the available data revealed that the level of development of intangible assets can accelerate the formation and development of digital entrepreneurship and facilitate business mobility. Technical and technological progress is proposed to be understood through the prism of the formation of Industry 5.0, which is a consistent process of improving and perfecting production and industrial business processes with the aim of producing new products and services while focusing on the quality of existing goods and services. It has been determined that changes in technology and technologies are indicative of transformations occurring in terms of digitalisation in production business processes. Alternatively, enterprises have the capacity to develop and utilise new or improved innovative products and digital services. The overall socio-economic effect of digital entrepreneurship is predicated on the interrelation of technical and technological changes, capital utilisation, and enhanced productivity per employee. It is hypothesised that, in terms of the genesis of Industry 5.0, this will signify the evolution of digital business, enhanced remuneration for proficient workers who possess digital competencies, and an enhancement in the quality and standard of living of the population.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
digital entrepreneurship, e-production, economic efficiency, Industry 5.0, production function, resource use, knowledge, innovation development institutions, technology, patents, citations
Anim-Yeboah, S., Boateng, R., Kolog, E.A., Owusu, A. & Bedi, I. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship in business enterprises: a systematic review. In: Hattingh, M., Matthee, M., Smuts, H., Pappas, I., Dwivedi, Y. & Mäntymäki, M. (eds). Responsible design, implementation and use of information and communication technology. Lecture notes in computer science, 12066. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_16
Balcerzak, A. P., Zinecker, M., Skalicky, R., Rogalska, E. & Doubravsky, K. (2023). Technology-oriented start-ups and valuation: a novel approach based on specific contract terms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 197: 122876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122876
Botti, A., Parente, R. & Vesci R. (Ed.) (2021). How to do business in digital era? : a casebook. Salerno-Cracow: Cracow University of Economics.
Botti, A., Parente, R. & Vesci, R. (2022). Teaching notes for Casebook ‘How to do business in digital era?’. Salerno-Cracow: Cracow University of Economics.
Bui, H.N. & Duong, C.D. (2024). ChatGPT adoption in entrepreneurship and digital entrepreneurial intention: a moderated mediation model of technostress and digital entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, vol. 19, no. 2: 391–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3074
Calimanu, S. (2023). How technology is changing the landscape of economic development. Research FDI investment attraction. Available at: https://researchfdi.com/resources/articles/how-technology-is-changing-the-landscape-of-economic-development/
Civelek, M., Krajčík, V. & Ključnikov, A. (2023). The impacts of dynamic capabilities on SMEs’ digital transformation process: the resource-based view perspective. Oeconomia Copernicana, vol. 14, no. 4: 1367–1392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.019
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Leon, L. R. & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. 16th edition. Geneva: WIPO. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2023-en-main-report-global-innovation-index-2023-16th-edition.pdf
Evenson, R. E. & Westphal, L. E. (1995). Chapter 37 Technological change and technology strategy. Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 3 (Part A): 2209–2299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(05)80009-9
Ghazy, N., Ghoneim, H. & Lang, G. (2022). Entrepreneurship, productivity and digitalization: evidence from the EU. Technology in Society, vol. 70: 102052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102052
Gu, J. (2022). Sharing economy, technological innovation and carbon emissions: evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 7: 100228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100228
Hausberg, J. P., Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., Pakura, S. & Vogelsang, K. (2019). Research streams on digital transformation from a holistic business perspective: a systematic literature review and citation network analysis. Journal of Business Economics, vol. 89: 931–963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00956-z
Herold, D. M. (2022). Digital Entrepreneurship Curriculum. Vienna-Cracow: Cracow University of Economics.
Kolupaieva, I. & Tiesheva, L. (2023). Asymmetry and convergence in the development of digital technologies in the EU countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, vol. 18, no. 3: 687–716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.022
Kraus, K., Kraus, N. & Manzhura, O. (2021). Digitalization of business processes of enterprises of the ecosystem of Industry 4.0: virtual-real aspect of economic growth reserves. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, vol. 18: 569–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2021.18.57
Kraus, K., Kraus, N., Manzhura, O., Ishchenko, I. & Radzikhovska, Y. (2023). Digital transformation of business processes of enterprises on the way to becoming Industry 5.0 in the gig economy. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, vol. 20: 1008–1029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.93
Magliocca, P. (Ed.) (2021). Doing business digitally: a textbook. Foggia-Cracow: Małopolska School of Public Administration, Cracow University of Economics.
Malkowska, A., Urbaniec, M. & Kosala, M. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on European countries: insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, vol. 16, no. 2: 325–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.012
McConnell, C.R., Brue, S.L. & Flynn, S.M. (2009). Economics: principles, problems, and policies. 18th edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (in English).
Meng, F. & Wang, W. (2023). The impact of digitalization on enterprise value creation: an empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 8: 100385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100385
Mumba, B. (2023). Technological advancement and changing skills: imperative for a paradigm shift in education delivery in Zambia. Qeios. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32388/8I8ARC
Ngantung, R. M., Masengi, E.E. & Bogar, W. (2024). The influence of information technology and compensation on the employees performance of the regional revenue and financial management agency. Technium Social Sciences Journal, vol. 59, no. 1: 23–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v59i1.11301
Peng, Y. & Tao, Ch. (2022). Can digital transformation promote enterprise performance? – From the perspective of public policy and innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 7: 100198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100198
Samuelson, P.A. & Nordhaus, W.D. (1998). Economics. 16th edition. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.
Song, Z., Mishra, A. R. & Saeidi, S. P. (2023). Technological capabilities in the era of the digital economy for integration into cyber-physical systems and the IoT using decision-making approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 8: 100356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100356
Suki, N. M., Suki, N. M., Sharif, A., Afshan, S. & Jermsittiparser, K. (2022). The role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing environmental degradation in Malaysia: a step towards sustainable environment. Renewable Energy, vol. 182: 245–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.007
Valaskova, K., Nagy, M. & Grecu, G. (2024). Digital twin simulation modeling, artificial intelligence-based Internet of manufacturing things systems, and virtual machine and cognitive computing algorithms in the Industry 4.0 – based Slovak labor market. Oeconomia Copernicana, vol. 15, no. 1: 95–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2814
Zhang, R. & Fu, Y. (2022). Technological progress effects on energy efficiency from the perspective of technological innovation and technology introduction: an empirical study of Guangdong, China. Energy Reports, vol. 8: 425–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.282

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.