STRATEGIC ASSET ALLOCATION IN A SMALL OPEN ECONOMY: EVIDENCE FROM ICELAND, 1992–2024
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
This paper examines the long-term strategic asset allocation of investors in small open economies, where the domestic financial markets are limited, unstable and vulnerable to significant country-specific shocks. Iceland is used as a case study. All wealth, risk and portfolio outcomes are evaluated in Icelandic krona (ISK). The analysis covers the period from 1992 to 2024, including financial liberalisation, the 2008 banking collapse, years of capital controls, and the subsequent tourism-led recovery. The study considers the following eight asset classes, which are available to Icelandic investors and constitute a realistic investable universe: These are Icelandic government bonds; a short-term, risk-free ISK asset; Icelandic equities; global, developed-market equities (MSCI World); emerging-market equities (MSCI Emerging Markets); US Treasury bills; UK government bonds; and gold. As foreign assets are held unhedged, returns reflect both asset-price movements and exchange-rate changes. Using annual data, the paper first documents the long-term risk and return characteristics of each asset in ISK terms. This includes arithmetic and geometric mean returns, volatility, correlations and behaviour during periods of crisis. It then applies a standard long-only mean–variance framework to characterise efficient portfolios for an ISK-based investor with a long time horizon. The results show that, despite high average one-year returns, domestic equities perform poorly in the long run. The collapse of 2008, in particular, drives their real geometric mean return below zero over the full sample due to extreme downside risk. In contrast, global equities deliver the strongest and most stable long-term growth in ISK, achieving the highest risk-adjusted performance. Foreign safe assets and gold offer robust protection during years of severe currency depreciation, but their average excess returns are insufficient for them to play a pivotal role in long-term efficient portfolios. Consequently, the efficient frontier is reduced to a combination of domestic government bonds, the risk-free ISK asset and global equities, with domestic equities and other foreign assets being largely excluded. The findings emphasise the significant expense of home bias in small, open economies with independent currencies. In the long term, achieving portfolio efficiency requires meaningful exposure to global equity markets, anchored by high-quality domestic bonds rather than heavy reliance on domestic equities.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
strategic asset allocation, small open economy, international diversification, currency risk, home bias
Adler, M. S., & Dumas, B. (1983). International Portfolio Choice and Corporation Finance: A Synthesis. The Journal of Finance, 38(3), 925–984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb02511.x
Benediktsdóttir, S., Eggertsson, G. B., & Þórarinsson, E. (2017). The Rise, the Fall, and the Resurrection of Iceland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w24005
Bloomberg. (n.d.). Market data. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/
Björnsdóttir, A., & Eiríksson, O. (2018). Icelandic pension funds: Potential benefits of increased international diversification: An empirical analysis for the period from 2004 to 2016 [Háskólinn í Reykjavík]. Available at: https://skemman.is/handle/1946/30757
Campbell, J. Y., Medeiros, K. S., & Viceira, L. M. (2010). Global Currency Hedging. The Journal of Finance, 65(1), 87–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01524.x
Central Bank of Iceland (2025, June 1). Available at: https://sedlabanki.is/gagnatorg/opinber-gengisskraning/
Coeurdacier, N., & Rey, H. (2013). Home Bias in Open Economy Financial Macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 63–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.63
Edwards, S. (2019). Inflation Targeting, Capital Controls, and Currency Intervention in Iceland, 2012–2017 (p. 395–410). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12395-6_20
Edwards, S., & Cabezas, L. (2022). Exchange Rate Pass-Through, Monetary Policy, and Real Exchange Rates: Iceland and the 2008 Crisis. Open Economies Review, 33(2), 197–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-021-09627-5
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1998). Value versus Growth: The International Evidence. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1975–1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00080
George, A. (2024). Iceland: Landsbanki Restructuring, 2008. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4779815
Grubel, H. (1968). Internationally Diversified Portfolios: Welfare Gains and Capital Flows. The American Economic Review, 58(5), 1299–1314.
Gylfason, Þ., & Zoëga, G. (2018). The Dutch Disease in Reverse: Iceland’s Natural Experiment (p. 13–36). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97692-1_2
Harvey, C. R. (1995). Predictable Risk and Returns in Emerging Markets. Review of Financial Studies, 8(3), 773–816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/8.3.773
Kristinsson, A. (2019). Efficient Asset Allocation between Domestic and Foreign Assets: A Comparative Study from an Icelandic, British and Polish Perspective. Available at: https://skemman.is/handle/1946/32813
Levy, H., & Sarnat, M. (1970). International Diversification of Investment Portfolios. The American Economic Review, 60(4), 668–675.
Lewis, K. K. (1999). Trying to Explain Home Bias in Equities and Consumption. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(2), 571–608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.2.571
Macheda, F., & Nadalini, R. (2019). The Danger of a “Geyser Disease” Effect: Structural Fragility of the Tourism-Led Recovery in Iceland. Review of Radical Political Economics, 52(1), 50–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613419867415
Magnússon, G., & Sigurðsson, K. (2023). Ávinningur af erlendri fjárfestingu í tæpa þrjá áratugi. Tímarit Um Viðskipti Og Efnahagsmál, 20(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24122/tve.a2023.20.1.1
Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
Merton, R. C. (1969). Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51(3), 247-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926560
Rúnasson, E., & Arnarsdóttir, E. (2009). Optimal portfolio investments of the Icelandic pension sector [Copenhagen Business School]. Available at: https://research-api.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/58451899/einar_thorbjoern_runarsson_og_eva_arnarsdottir.pdf
Santis, G. D., & Gérard, B. (1997). International Asset Pricing and Portfolio Diversification with Time‐Varying Risk. The Journal of Finance, 52(5), 1881–1912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02745.x
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2977928
Solnik, B. (1974). Why Not Diversify Internationally Rather than Domestically? Financial Analysts Journal, 30(4), 48–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v30.n4.48
Statistics Iceland. (2025, December 1). Available at: https://www.hagstofa.is/
Tesar, L. L., & Werner, I. M. (1995). Home bias and high turnover. Journal of International Money and Finance, 14(4), 467–492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5606(95)00023-8
Tobin, J. (1958). Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk. The Review of Economic Studies, 25(2), 65–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296205

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.