GROUNDS FOR LIMITING PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE APPLICATION OF TEMPORARY SEIZURE OF PROPERTY IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: Jun 7, 2018
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-328-333

  Tetiana Suprun

  Tetiana Yatsyk

  Victoria Shkelebei

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to investigate reasons for the restriction of property rights in the application of temporary seizure of property in criminal proceedings and to determine promising directions for further research on the issues. The issue of measures to ensure criminal proceedings and observance of human and civil rights and freedoms was investigated by a number of domestic scientists, but the degree of investigation of grounds for restricting property rights in the application of temporary seizure of property in criminal proceedings in the context of amendments made to the CPC of Ukraine in recent years remains insufficient. That is why the study of the grounds for limiting property rights in the application of temporary seizure of property in criminal proceedings is now of particular urgency. Methodology. Methodological basis of the research is a set of philosophical, general scientific, special scientific methods. The method of logical-semantic analysis is used to clarify the meaning of multi-valued concepts, the application of the method of system analysis allowed investigating the place of the institute of property rights in legal literature and legislation of Ukraine. The method of grouping and the system and structural approach are used for classifying the distribution, ascertaining the internal structure, and analysing the interconnections between elements of the concept of ownership and the category of property rights restriction. Results. The paper examines the factual and formal legal grounds for limiting the ownership of a suspect, accused, and other persons in the application of temporary seizure of property in a criminal proceeding. The conclusion is drawn on the need to clarify the factual grounds for the temporary seizure of property for cases where such a seizure is carried out by a person who has carried out legal detention in the manner prescribed by Articles 207, 208 of the CPC of Ukraine and is not an investigator, prosecutor, or other authorized official. Practical implications. Proposals regarding the resolution of individual legal conflicts in the current CPC of Ukraine are provided.

How to Cite

Suprun, T., Yatsyk, T., & Shkelebei, V. (2018). GROUNDS FOR LIMITING PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE APPLICATION OF TEMPORARY SEIZURE OF PROPERTY IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 328-333. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-328-333
Article views: 327 | PDF Downloads: 266

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

right of property, temporary seizure of property, restriction of individual rights, criminal proceedings

References

Nersesian A. S. (2015) Zabezpechennia mainovykh prav hromadian i yurydychnykh osib pry zastosuvanni tymchasovoho vyluchennia maina u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Provision of property rights of citizens and legal entities in the application of temporary seizure of property in criminal proceedings]. Sudova apeliatsiia, no. 2, pp. 50-56.

Morhun N. S. (2015) Zasada nedotorkanosti prava vlasnosti u dosudovomu kryminalnomu provadzhenni [The principle of inviolability of property rights in pre-trial criminal proceedings] (PhD Thesis), Kyiv.

Novoselova L. A. (2001) Opredelenye obektov prava sobstvennosty [Definition of objects of ownership]. Hrazhdanyn y pravo, no. 2, pp. 21-27.

Aliamkin V. V. (2011) Dekilka mirkuvan shchodo zabezpechennia prava pryvatnoi vlasnosti [Several considerations regarding the provision of private property rights]. Pravo ta upravlinnia, no. 1, pp. 12-16.

Dzera O. V. (1996) Rozvytok prava vlasnosti hromadian v Ukraini [Development of property rights of citizens in Ukraine]. Kyiv: Venturi. (in Ukrainian)

Dzera O. V., Kuznetsova N. S., Pidopryhora O. A. (2000) Pravo vlasnosti v Ukraini [The right of property in Ukraine]. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter. (in Ukrainian)

Kuchynska O. P., Fulei T. I., Barannik R. V. (2013) Pryntsypy kryminalnoho provadzhennia u svitli praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny [Principles of criminal proceedings in the light of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights]. Nizhyn: TOV “Vyd-vo “Aspekt-Polihraf ”. (in Ukrainian)

Soloviov O. M. (2011) Obmezhennia prava vlasnosti: deiaki aspekty problem [Restriction on the right of ownership: some aspects of the problem]. Proceedings of the Aktualni problemy tsyvilnoho prava: materialy kruhloho stolu, prysviacheni pamiati profesora Chynhizkhana Nufatovycha Azimova (Ukraine, Kharkiv, December 23, 2010), Kharkiv: Pravo, pp. 107-109.

Holos Ukrainy (2012) Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13 kvitnia 2012 r. [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine on 13 April 2012]. Holos Ukrainy, no 90-91.

Sheyfer S. A. (1981) Sledstvennye deystviya. Sistema i protsessualnaya forma [Investigative actions. System and procedural form]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. (in Russian)

Rudenko A. E. (2015) Zakhody zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia, shcho obmezhuiut mainovi prava pidozriuvanoho, obvynuvachenoho ta inshykh osib [Measures to ensure criminal proceedings restricting the property rights of the suspect, the accused, and other persons] (PhD Thesis), Kyiv.

Litvinova I. (2017) Pidstavy obmezhennia prava osoby na nedotorkannist zhytla u khodi obshuku [Grounds for restricting the right of a person to the inviolability of housing during the search]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, no. 10, pp. 212-216.

Shepitko V. Yu. (2005) Kriminalistika [Criminalistics]. Kharkov: Odissey. (in Russian)

Rozghon O. V. (2005) Mezhi ta obmezhennia prava vlasnosti [Limits and restrictions on the right of property] (PhD Thesis), Kharkiv.

Kovalenko Ye. H. (2008) Kryminalnyi protses Ukrainy [The criminal process of Ukraine]. Kyiv : Yurinkom Inter. (in Ukrainian)

Chernenko A. P. (2004) Kryminalno-protsesualna rehlamentatsiia slidchykh dii [Criminal-procedural regulation of investigative actions] (PhD Thesis), Kharkiv.

Pohoretskyi M. A. (2007) Funktsionalne pryznachennia operatyvno-rozshukovoi diialnosti u kryminalnomu protsesi [The functional purpose of operative-search activity in the criminal process]. Kharkiv: Arsis LTD. (in Ukrainian)

Kalachova O. M. (2008) Vyznachennia slidchym protsesualnoho statusu osib, shcho berut uchast u dosudovomu provadzhenni [Definition by the investigator of the procedural status of persons participating in pre-trial proceedings] (PhD Thesis), Luhansk.

Bandurka O. M., Blazhivskyi Ye. M., Burdol Ye. P. (etc.) (2012) Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy. Naukovopraktychnyi komentar [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine. Scientific and practical commentary]. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)

Myroshnychenko Yu. M. (2013) Problemni pytannia tymchasovoho vyluchennia y areshtu maina za novym kryminalno-protsesualnym zakonom [Problematic issues of temporary seizure and arrest of property under the new Criminal Procedure Law]. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo, no. 3, pp. 310-312.

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): Baltic Journal of Economic Studies