GIFTS FOR A PUBLIC SERVANT: WHETHER IT IS WORTH TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Jul 25, 2018

  Tatiana Kolomoets

  Semen Stetsenko

  Anna Sharaia

Abstract

The article substantiates the expediency to distinguish a kind of “gift relations in the public service” – “gift relations with the participation of close persons of a public servant.” The author draws attention to the specificity of the subjects of the relevant relations, which is a public servant (a person empowered to exercise the functions of the state or local self-government and “serve” for a public interest) and close persons of the public servant (persons connected with the public servant by means of family, friendly relations) A gift in these relations differs by peculiarity because it is oriented solely to the person of a public servant, and not to his professional activities, his special legal status. Its presentation does not imply any influence on the “purity” of the professional activities of a public servant. In view of this, it is inappropriate to consider the normative consolidation of the appropriate “personal” (it is also called “private”, “ordinary”, “normal”) gift to requirements for cost, grounds, the periodicity of receiving. At the same time, despite the specifics of “gift relations with the participation of a public servant,” they cannot remain outside the regulatory framework. Such regulation allows strengthening the foundations of determinacy in the “gift policy” of the state and eliminating the grounds for use of “gifts from close persons” as a means of “indirect” influence, including inappropriate, on the professional activities of public servants or concealment of unjust enrichment of the latter. The author justifies the inappropriate use of prohibitions and restrictions in the regulation of appropriate kind of “gift relations in the public service.” Instead, the introduction of an obligatory annual declaration where public servants point all gifts, including “personal” ones, indicating donor’s personality, the nature of the relationship with him, the market value of the gift. A similar obligation is proposed to provide for close persons of a public servant (first of all, family members as well as close persons who live together with a public servant) in order to strengthen the principles of transparency of “gift relations with the participation of close persons of a public servant,” confirmation of the history of relationship, funds sources for gift’s presentation (the indication of funds sources for the gift is mandatory for this group of persons). For the effective use of the declaration, proposals are formulated to unify the provisions of anti-corruption, tax and tort legislation in the aspect of compliance with the requirements for obtainment of gifts by public servants from their relatives.

How to Cite

Kolomoets, T., Stetsenko, S., & Sharaia, A. (2018). GIFTS FOR A PUBLIC SERVANT: WHETHER IT IS WORTH TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(2), 106-113. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-2-106-113
Article views: 393 | PDF Downloads: 287

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

close persons, public service, public servant, gift, corruption, declaration, rules, gift receiving

References

Vasileva, V.M. (2015) Regulirovanie konflikta interesov na gosudarstvennoy sluzhbe: Brazilskiy opyt (chast 2) [Regulation of conflict of interests in public service: the Brazilian experience (part 2)]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya, vol. 3, pp. 165–190.

Gladchenko, L.V. (2014) Ob opyte Singapura po protivodeystviyu korruptsii [On Singapore’s experience in countering corruption]. Problemy natsionalnoy strategi, no. 3 (24), pp. 126–138; Astafyeva, E.M. (2016) Borba s korruptsiey v Singapure: strategiya i praktika [Fight with corruption in Singapore: strategy and practice]. Aziya i Afrika segodnya, vol. 1, pp. 52–59.

Kolyshkyna, S.S. Korruptsionnye skandaly v Yaponii na rubezhe XX – XXI vv. [Corruption scandals in Japan at the turn of the XX – XXI centuries.]. Retrieved from: http://syberleninka.ru/article/u/

Gafurova, A. Kh. (2015) K voprosu o darenii predmetov roskoshi, kak izmenchivoy sostavlyayushchey etapov razvitiya obshchestva. Osobennosti polucheniya podarkov gosudarstvennymi sluzhashchimi [On the issue of presentation of luxury goods as a volatile component of the stages of society development. Peculiarities of gifts receipt by civil servants]. Vestnik KGU imeni N.A. Nekrasova. Yuridicheskie nauki, no. 6, pp. 169–172.

Kolomoiets, T. O. (2018) Obmezhennia shchodo oderzhannia podarunkiv osobamy, upovnovazhenymy na vykonannia funktsii derzhavy abo mistsevoho samovriaduvannia za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy: naukovopraktychnyi komentar [Restrictions on the reception of gifts by persons authorized to perform functions of the state or local self-government under the legislation of Ukraine: scientific and practical commentary]. Zaporizhzhia: Publishing House “Helvetica”, pp. 40.

Nysnvevich, Yu.A. (2016) Protivodeystvie korruptsii: fenomen Slovenii [Anti-corruption: the phenomenon of Slovenia]. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, issue 60, vol. 3, pp. 36–48.

Tolmachev, N.A. (2016) Borba s korruptsiey v Indonezii na sovremennom etape [The fight against corruption in Indonesia at the present stage]. Problemy Dalnego Vostoka, no. 4, pp. 93–99.

Zimneva, S., Chumakova, A. (2015) Legal Regulation of Civil Servants in Russia and Germany Receiving Gifts. Russian Law Journal, vol. III, issue 3, pp. 142–151.

Kolomoiets, T., Verlos, N., Pyrozhkova, Y. (2018) Gift for a Public Servant – a Manifestation of Respect, Reward or a Means of Unlawful Influence. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. Riga: Publishing House “Baltia”, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 227–234.

Bonsing, S., Langsted, L. (2013) Gifs for Public Employees: An Administrative and Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. Undue, no. 21, pp. 163 – 184.

Khavroniuk, M.I. (ed.) (2018) Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro zapobihannia koruptsii» [Scientific and practical commentary of the Law of Ukraine “On Prevention of Corruption”], Кyiv: Vaite.

O nesovmestimosti interesov i korruptsii v publichnykh uchrezhdeniyakh: Zakon Gruzii ot 21.12.2016 goda № 157 [On the Conflict of Interests and Corruption in Public Services: the Law of Georgia dated 21.12. 2016 No 157] Retrieved from: https://matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/download/33550/55/ru/pdf

Kolomoiets, T. O. (2018) Obmezhennia shchodo oderzhannia podarunkiv osobamy, upovnovazhenymy na vykonannia funktsii derzhavy abo mistsevoho samovriaduvannia za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy: naukovopraktychnyi komentar. [Restrictions on the reception of gifts by persons authorized to perform functions of the state or local self-government under the legislation of Ukraine: scientific and practical commentary]. Zaporizhzhia: Publishing House “Helvetica”, pp. 40.

Villoria, M., Synnerström, S., Bertok, J (2010) Etyka derzhavnoi sluzhby: zapobihannia konfliktu interesiv ta vymohy do zakonodavstva [Ethics of the civil service: prevention of conflict of interests and requirements to legislation]. Kyiv: Centre for Adaptation of the Civil Service to the standards of the European Union, pp. 104.