INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION IN THE FIELD OF LAWMAKING IN THE CONTEXT OF UKRAINE'S INTEGRATION INTO THE EU

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Aug 7, 2026

  Stepan Kovbasiuk

  Viktoriia Formaniuk

  Vitalii Oliinyk

Abstract

This study examines the theoretical, legal and practical aspects of international economic co-operation in the context of Ukraine's accession to the EU. This is important given Ukraine's status as a candidate for EU accession and the ongoing process of European integration, as well as the need for thorough reform of the national legal system in line with European standards. International economic co-operation is expanding beyond traditional trade and economic relations to increasingly encompass legal regulation. This is because successful economic integration hinges on proper legislative harmonisation and effective mechanisms for regulating social relations. International economic co-operation is an important means of aligning Ukrainian legislation with that of the European Union. The process of legal integration has been found to entail not only aligning national legislation with EU law, but also amending the lawmaking process and improving procedures for drafting and assessing the impact of regulations, as well as implementing advanced tools for monitoring legislation's effectiveness. The study concludes that the Association Agreement is a vital legal mechanism that paves the way for legislative harmonisation and establishes the regulatory preconditions for Ukraine's continued integration into the European legal framework. The study found that the Ukrainian lawmaking system is gradually aligning with European standards. This is evident through the introduction of new institutional instruments and the development of a regulatory framework. However, several issues were also identified, such as fragmented individual lawmaking procedures, ineffective impact assessment mechanisms, limited use of legal oversight tools and insufficient institutional capacity within government bodies. Particular attention was paid to the impact of martial law on lawmaking and the importance of adhering to relevant governance rules and making effective regulatory decisions. The subject of this study is international economic co-operation in lawmaking, as it relates to Ukraine’s integration into the European Union. Methodology. The formal-legal method was applied to analyse the provisions of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the European Union, the Law of Ukraine “On Lawmaking Activity”, the Treaty on European Union and other legal acts governing the process of legislative harmonisation and legislative activity. The comparative legal method made it possible to identify similarities and differences between the Ukrainian and European approaches to lawmaking, regulatory policy, impact assessment, public consultation and legal monitoring. The systemic method was employed to analyse lawmaking activity within the context of a broader legal and institutional framework of European integration. Meanwhile, the functional method was employed to evaluate the practical effectiveness of legal mechanisms designed to implement European standards within the Ukrainian legal system. The aim of this article is to examine the role of international economic co-operation in the development of lawmaking activities in Ukraine in the context of European integration. Results. The research demonstrates that international economic co-operation has become one of the main factors influencing the transformation of Ukraine’s lawmaking system during its integration into the European Union. It has been established that bringing Ukrainian legislation into line with the European Union's acquis involves changes not only to the content of legal norms, but also to the way rules are made. The present study demonstrates that the adoption of the Law of Ukraine "On Lawmaking Activity" signifies a significant step towards the institutional modernisation of the national lawmaking framework and the implementation of European regulatory standards. Concurrently, the research identifies several challenges, including the need to strengthen the institutional capacity of public authorities responsible for European integration. Conclusion. International economic co-operation in the field of lawmaking constitutes an essential element of Ukraine's European integration process and serves as an important mechanism for the modernisation of the national legal system. The approximation of Ukrainian legislation to European Union law necessitates not only the harmonisation of legal norms but also the transformation of lawmaking procedures and institutional practices in accordance with European standards of good governance.

How to Cite

Kovbasiuk, S., Formaniuk, V., & Oliinyk, V. (2026). INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION IN THE FIELD OF LAWMAKING IN THE CONTEXT OF UKRAINE’S INTEGRATION INTO THE EU. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 12(4), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2026-12-4-39-46
Article views: 29 | PDF Downloads: 20

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

international economic co-operation, lawmaking activity, European integration, European Union, approximation of legislation, harmonisation of law, acquis Communautaire, regulatory policy, legal monitoring, better regulation, public governance

References

Jacqué, P. (2024). European Union approves opening of formal accession negotiations with Ukraine. Le Monde. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/06/21/european-union-approves-opening-of-formal-accession-negotiations-with-ukraine_6675304_4.html

European Union. (2023). Association agreement with Ukraine. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/association-agreement-with-ukraine.html

European Union. (2014). Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (OJ L 161, 29 May 2014). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A22014A0529%2801%29

European Union. (n.d.). Approximation of the laws of the Member States (1). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/approximation-of-the-laws-of-the-member-states-1.html

Petrov, R., Van der Loo, G., & Van Elsuwege, P. (2015). The EU–Ukraine Association Agreement: A New Legal Instrument of Integration Without Membership? Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, (1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj52678.2015-1.1-19

Raudla, R., & Spendzharova, A. (2022). Challenges to the European single market at thirty: Renationalisation, resilience, or renewed integration? Journal of European Integration, 44(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.2011263

Horodyskyy, I., Borko, A., & Sirotkina, M. (2021). Adaptation of Ukrainian Corporate Legislation to European Standards. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7(3), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-3-56-64

Ghio, E. (2024). Harmonisation and European Integration in Times of Crisis. In E. Ghio, & R. Perlingeiro (Eds.), Are Legal Systems Converging or Diverging? Lessons from Contemporary Crises. Springer. pp. 255-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38180-5_14

Schmidt, J., & Steingress, W. (2022). No Double Standards: Quantifying the Impact of Standard Harmonization on Trade. Journal of International Economics, 137, 103619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103619

Pelkmans, J. (2002). Mutual recognition in goods and services: An economic perspective (BEEP Briefing No. 2). College of Europe. https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/beep2_0.pdf

Eurostat. (2025). Trade in goods with Ukraine in 2024. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20250507-1

Meuwese, A. C. M., & Radaelli, C. M. (2010). Hard questions, hard solutions: Proceduralisation through impact assessment in the EU. West European Politics, 33(1), 136-153. https://repository.tilburguniversity.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/5b3764d8-6fe4-4731-9655-c2ef995b6bc7/content

Emerson, M., & Movchan, V. (Eds.). (2016). Deepening EU–Ukrainian relations: What, why and how? Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) & Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting (IER). Rowman & Littlefield International. https://cdn.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Ukraine%20e-version%20with%20covers.pdf

European Commission. (2025). Better Regulation Toolbox (December 2025 ed.). European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/better-regulation/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox_en

The Law of Ukraine "On Lawmaking Activity" of April 19, 2025, No. 3354-IX. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada (BVR), 2023, No. 93, Art. 364. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3354-20?lang=en#Text

Albanesi, E. (2024). Legislative drafting techniques as a means of giving effect to the rule of law: The case of Ukraine. Constitutional and Legal Academic Studies, (1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.24144/2663-5399.2024.1.06

Court of Justice of the European Union. (1996). Duff and Others v Minister for Agriculture and Food and the Attorney General (Case C-63/93, ECLI:EU:C:1996:51). European Court Reports, I-598. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:61993CJ0063

Court of Justice of the European Union. (2005). Vereniging voor Energie, Milieu en Water (VEMW), Amsterdam Power Exchange Spotmarket BV and Eneco NV v Directeur van de Dienst uitvoering en toezicht energie (Case C-17/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:362). European Court Reports, I-4983. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:62003CJ0017

European Union. (2012). Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C 326, 13–390. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:2bf140bf-a3f8-4ab2-b506-fd71826e6da6.0023.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

Meyers, Z. (2024). Better regulation in Europe: An action plan for the next Commission. Centre for European Reform. https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/pb_ZM_better_regulation_19.3.24.pdf

OECD/SIGMA. (2023). Public administration in Ukraine: Assessment against the Principles of Public Administration. OECD Publishing. https://www.sigmaweb.org/content/dam/sigma/en/publications/reports/2024/02/public-administration-in-ukraine_27a46a58/078d08d4-en.pdf

de Lucio, J., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2022). Drafting “better regulation”: The economic cost of regulatory complexity. Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.10.003

Zhang, C., Liu, N., & Yuan, M. (2024). More is better? Stakeholder participation in regulatory rule-setting towards green transition. Journal of environmental management, 349, 119484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119484

Pyroha, I., Tokarchuk, L., Perezhniak, B., Nikitenko, L., & Berch, V. (2022). E-democracy: an urgent need or a tribute to fashion? Legal analysis. Amazonia Investiga, 11(51), 240-249. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.51.03.24

Martins, J., & Veiga, L. G. (2022). Digital government as a business facilitator. Information Economics and Policy, 60, 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.100990

Digital State UA. (2026). From digital state to agentic state: What changes inside Ukraine's Ministry of Digital Transformation. https://digitalstate.gov.ua/news/govtech/nastupnyy-etap-tsyfrovoyi-derzavy-shi-defenstek-ta-upravlinnia

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2021. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/10/oecd-regulatory-policy-outlook-2021_c5274577/38b0fdb1-en.pdf