The presented work is an attempt to compare the quality of governance in non-EU states in the Western Balkans and Eastern Europe with which the EU Association Agreements have been concluded, and Ukraine, including aspects of the impact of the DCFTA (Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas). The most important issues are the interpretation of the results, the equality of countries, and the political consequences that may arise after the progression and the rapid pace of the member countries of the DCFTA towards the countries of the Balkan region. The identified countries seek full membership in the EU. Although the EU distinguishes between these countries, it recognizes “European prospects”, that is, membership in the EU, the commitments to adopt or approach EU laws and policies, made by both groups of countries, have much in common. This makes the comparison between the countries of the Balkan region and the member states of the DCFTA a sound and politically significant one. Such comparison is facilitated by numerous sources, qualitative assessments, and official ratings. Figuratively by analytical indicators, the countries can be divided into the first group of leading countries (Serbia and Montenegro) for which in February 2018 the European Commission proposed to consider 2025 as the possible date of accession to the EU. The second group (Albania and Macedonia), for which the date of accession negotiations is conditionally open in 2019. The third group includes Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, for which there are no dates, and Turkey, the negotiations with which are suspended. For comparison, if we take both political and economic indicators of Ukraine, it is approximately equal to the Balkan states of the second group and outstrips the states of the third group. The prospect of EU membership was recognized as the strongest external factor of internal political changes in the countries surrounding the EU. One of the most striking trends is the steady decline in the standards of political governance in all countries, for which the EU expands its membership perspective. One of the main manifestations of poor governance in the broader neighbourhood is the widespread corruption and impunity of officials. Weak rule of law and ineffective law enforcement bodies have become common practice in all different states and have allowed current officials to act impunity during their term of office. The identified results challenge the assumption dominating in political and scientific circles that a credible prospect of EU membership is steadily generating an internal environment conducive to democratic changes. The effectiveness of economic governance was assessed by the indicators of competitiveness of the national economy (Global Competitiveness Index, Corruption Perceptions Index, Human Development Index, Ease of Doing Business Index, Index of Economic Freedom, Index of Globalization, SEDA (Sustainable Economic Development Assessment)); GDP dynamics; the volume of foreign direct investment; economic activity of the population. In practice, the EU applies an increasing number of common economic policy instruments for the Balkans and member countries of the DCFTA, in spite of the political (or rhetorical) differentiation between countries, given the categorization of membership prospects. The convergence of the actual EU policy has taken place. The Association Agreements and the DCFTA have raised the level of political and economic governance in Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine at the level of the Balkan countries while the expansion process for the Balkan countries has not advanced.

How to Cite

Latkovska, T., & Bila-Tiunova, L. (2019). POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND UKRAINE. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(3), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-91-98
Article views: 548 | PDF Downloads: 225



European studies, DCFTA, political governance, economic governance, Baltic States, democratic choice


Balkans in Europe Policy Advisory Group (BiEPAG) (2017). The Crisis of Democracy in the Western Balkans. Authoritarianism and EU Stabilitocracy. Policy Paper, March. Retrieved from: http://www.biepag.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/BIEPAG-The-Crisis-of-Democracy-in-the-Western-Balkans.-Authoritarianism-and-EUStabilitocracy-web.pdf

Bechev, D. (2016). Europe’s Refugee Crisis and the Balkans. Expert Brief, Alsharq Forum, 8 June. Retrieved from: http://sharqforum.org/2016/06/08/europes-refugee-crisis-and-the-balkans/

Bertelsmann Stiftung (2018). Bertelsmann Transformation Index, Gütersloh.

Blockmans, S. (2017). The Obsolescence of the European Neighbourhood Policy, CEPS and Rowman & Littlefield International, October.

Börzel, Tanja A. and Frank Schimmelfennig (2017). Coming together or drifting apart? The EU’s political integration capacity in Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 24:2, 278–296.

EBRD (2018). Transition Report. London. Emerson, M. (2018). The strategic potential of a Wider European Economic Area (WEEA), CEPS Commentary, CEPS, February.

European Commission (2018a). A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans.

Environmental Performance Index (2016). Global Metrics For The Environment. Retrieved from: https://www.epi.yale.edu

COM (2018). 65 final, Strasbourg, 6.2.2018. European Commission, ‘2018 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy’, COM (2018)450 final, 17 April 2018; to which are annexed “Accompanying documents” on Montenegro, Serbia, Macedonia, Bosnia, Albania, Kosovo and Turkey.

Freedom House (2018). Freedom in the World, 2018: Democracy in Crisis.

Paweł Dziekański (2017). Diversification synthetic indicator for evaluating the financial capacity of local government. the case of polish Voivodeships. Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae mendelianae brunensis; volume 65 number 2. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765020611

Pomorska, K., Noutcheva, G. (2017). Europe as a Regional Actor: Waning Influence in an Unstable and Authoritarian Neighbourhood. Journal of Common Market Studies 55: (S1), 165–176.

Popescu, Nicu (2018). Why Georgia’s Lessons for Russia Don’t Apply in Ukraine, Carnegie Moscow Center, 13 February https://carnegie.ru/commentary/75483

Shevel, Oxana (2014). How Putin Turned Ukraine to the West, Monkey Cage, Washington Post, 29 October. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/10/29/how-putin-turnedukraine-to-the-west/

Richter, Solveig (2012). Two at one blow? The EU and its quest for security and democracy by political conditionality in the Western Balkans’. Democratization, 19:3, 507–534.

Transparency International (2017). Corruption Perception Index, 2016, 25 January.

Vachudova, Milada Anna (2014). EU Leverage and National Interests in the Balkans: The Puzzles of Enlargement Ten Years On, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52:1, 122–138.

World Justice Project (2018). Rule of Law Index, 2017–2018.