DEVELOPMENT OF THE STEREOMETRIC METHOD TO THE ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC CATEGORIES AND PROCESSES AND ITS APPLICATION IN SECURITY AND TAXATION

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: Oct 29, 2019
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-160-170

  Vladimir Nusinov

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9293-2969

  Ievgeniia Mishchuk

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-3711

  Yaroslav Izmaylov

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4853-205X

Abstract

The article is aimed at the enhancement of the stereometric approach to analysing economic categories and processes and investigating directions of its application in the science of security and taxation. Methodology. The methodological basis of the study consists of general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, a comparative study of existing models of economic categories, which are based on the stereometric approach. The empirical method is used to describe the problem of using a stereometric approach to determining the economic security of an enterprise. The results of the study. The article demonstrates that modern realities increasingly require spatial thinking from economists, thus conditioning the appearance of 3D models of some economic categories in economic research papers. A number of stereometric elements have been applied by both foreign and Ukrainian scholars in the economic sphere for several decades. The article points out that no current model could claim the complete realization of the stereometric approach as an independent unidirectional array of the content of principles and methods of analysing economic categories and processes. There are also determined regularities not considered by other scientists, as well as current problems and omissions. Practical implications. There are substantiated differences between the stereometric and graphical methods of economic analysis. The stereometric approach is suggested to be meant as one of the economic analysis approaches based on visualization of economic categories and processes on the basis of geometric solids allowing qualitative and quantitative assessment of the level and dynamics of the selected array of indicators put into a single graphical model. There is revealed essence and principles of the stereometric approach use in the economy and in the science of security in particular. Economic security is treated as one of the ternary nature being resources, processes and a condition simultaneously. The article suggests a pyramid to determine economic security and proves that changes of quality, speed, and quantity of business processes expressed by changes of corresponding angles of the pyramid impact both the condition and the general level of economic security. Relevance/originality. The presented proposals on enhancing the stereometric approach create a theoretical foundation for applied research in various industries. The enhanced stereometric approach enables building a general-theoretical concept of economic security considering its connections with such notions as competitiveness and development.

How to Cite

Nusinov, V., Mishchuk, I., & Izmaylov, Y. (2019). DEVELOPMENT OF THE STEREOMETRIC METHOD TO THE ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC CATEGORIES AND PROCESSES AND ITS APPLICATION IN SECURITY AND TAXATION. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(4), 160-170. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-160-170
Article views: 812 | PDF Downloads: 239

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

analysis, economic security, taxation, process, stereometric approach

References

Atkin, D., Khandelwal, A. K., & Osman, A. (2017). Exporting and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 551–615.

Beley, O. I. (2012). Pobudova modeli pryzmy efektyvnosti torhovelnoho pidpryiemstva [Building a trade enterprise performance prism]. Torhivlia, komertsiia, pidpryiemnytstvo, 14, 16–20. (in Ukrainian)

Biloshkurska, N. V. (2012). Vdoskonalennia ekonomiko-orhanizatsiinoho mekhanizmu ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstv APK [Enhancement of the economic and organizational mechanism of economic security of agroindustrial complex enterprises]. Efektyvna ekonomika, 11. Retrieved from: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1081 (in Ukrainian)

Chebanova, T. Ye., & Koretska, O. V. (2015). Otsinka stiikosti ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstv portovoi diialnosti [Assessment of economic security stability of port companies]. Rozvytok metodiv upravlinnia ta hospodariuvannia na transporti, 2(51), 55–71. (in Ukrainian)

Dotson, J. P. (2018). A Probit Model with Structured Covariance for Similarity Effects and Source of Volume Calculations. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(1), 35–47.

Drucker, P. (1994). Upravleniye dlya rezultatov [Managing for results]. Moscow: Texnichna shkola biznesu. (in Russian)

Ishchenko, M. I. (2013). Model otsinky resursnoho zabezpechennia finansovo-ekonomichnykh rezultativ diialnosti pidpryiemstva [The model of assessing resource provision of financial and economic results of an enterprise’s activity]. Stratehiia ekonomichnoho rozvytku Ukrainy, 33, 220–228. (in Ukrainian)

Ishchenko, M. I. (2014). Metodolohichni osnovy otsinky finansovo-ekonomichnykh rezultativ diialnosti pidpryiemstv (na prykladi hirnycho zbahachuvalnykh kombinativ) [Methodological foundations of assessment of financial and economic results of enterprise performance (as exemplified by mining and concentrating enterprises)] (Doctoral dissertation). Kryvyi Rih: Kryvyi Rih National University. (in Ukrainian)

Gerasymenko, A., Borovyk, Iu., & Afendikova, S. (2017). The ethodology of competition assessment. Economic Annals – ХХI, 165(5–6), 52–55.

Hempel, C. (2000). Science, Explanation, and Rationality: Aspects of the Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel. NY: Oxford University Press.

Holden, C. W., Jacobsen, S., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2014). The Empirical Analysis of Liquidity. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 8(4), 263–365.

Juhn, C., McCue, K., Monti, H., & Pierce, B. (2018). Firm Performance and the Volatility of Worker Earnings. Journal of Labor Economics, 36(1), 99–131.

Kirichenko, O. A., & Shykova, O. M. (2011). Suchasne modeliuvannia system ekonomichnoi bezpeky [Modern Modeling of economic security systems]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 3, 35–38. (in Ukrainian)

Korchevska, L. O. (2016). Metodolohiia synerhetychnoho upravlinnia ekonomichnoiu bezpekoiu pidpryiemstva [Methods of synergetic management of economic security of an enterprise: monograph]. Kherson: Private entrepreneur Vishimirsky V. S. (in Ukrainian)

Kretova, A. Yu. (2011). Tryvymirna model otsiniuvannia efektyvnosti diialnosti promyslovoho pidpryiemstva [A 3-D model of industrial enterprise performance assessment]. Ekonomika, Menedzhment, Pidpryiemnytstvo, 23 (ІІ), 111–120. (in Ukrainian)

Liashenko, O. M. (2008). Piramida efektyvnosti vzaiemouzghodzhennia interesiv yak instrument vymiriuvannia ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva [The pyramid of performance and mutual agreement of interests as a tool of measuring economic security of an enterprise]. Formuvannia rynkovoi ekonomiky, IІ, 396–401. (in Ukrainian)

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Originally Published in Psychological Review, 370–396.

McNair, C. J., Lunch, R. L., & Cross, K. F. (1990). Do financial and nonfinancial performance measures have to agree? Management Accounting, 28–36.

Neely, A., Adams, C., & Kennerley, M. (2003). Prizma proizvoditelnosti: sistema pokazateley dlya izmereniya i upravleniya uspekhom v biznese [The performance prism: The scorecard for measuring and managing business success]. Dnipropetrovsk: Balance-club. (in Ukrainian)

Oleksyuk, O. I. (2009). Tekhnolohiia otsinky rezultatyvnosti diialnosti pidpryiemstva [Technology of enterprise performance assessment]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats CDTU, 22, 169–173. (in Ukrainian)

Oleksyuk, O. I. (2008). Teoretychni osnovy otsinky rezultatyvnosti diialnosti pidpryiemstv [Theoretical foundations of enterprise performance assessment]. Ekonomika ta pidpryiemnytstvo, 20, 192–202. (in Ukrainian)

Sahaidak, M. P. (2015). Metodychni pidkhody do modeliuvannia potentsialu vnutrishnoho marketynhu pidpryiemstv sfery posluh [Methodological approaches to modeling internal marketing potential of service enterprises]. Visnyk Skhidnoukrainskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V. Dalia, 4(221), 226–231. (in Ukrainian)

Sink, D. S. (1985). Productivity management: planning, measurement and evaluation, control, and improvement. New York: Wiley.

Tulchinskiy, G. K. (2017). Konstruktivizm i stereometricheskaya semantika: osnovaniya normativno-tsennostnogo sinteza v sotsialnykh naukakh [Constructivism and stereometric semantics: the foundations of normative-value synthesis in social sciences]. Chelovek. Kultura. Obrazovanye, 1(23), 32–42. (in Russian)

Zavorotnii, R. I. (2015). Stereometrychnyi pidkhid u otsintsi dynamiky hospodarskoho rozvytku pidpryiemstva [The stereometric approach to assessing dynamics of economic development of an enterprise]. Finansy Ukrainy, 8, 101–113. (in Ukrainian)

Zhuchkova, H. A. (2013). Rezultatyvnist diialnosti pidpryiemstva: naukovo-metodychni aspekty yii vyznachennia [Enterprise performance: research and methodological aspects of determination]. Efektyvna ekonomika, 11. Retrieved from: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=2517 (in Ukrainian)

Issue
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2019): Baltic Journal of Economic Studies