THE FEATURES OF ENTREPRENEURIAL INTERACTIONS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN TERMS OF INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATIONS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: Oct 29, 2019
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-171-181

  Maksym Odnorog

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-6181

  Nataliia Kraus

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-3980

  Kateryna Kraus

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-8330

Abstract

Entrepreneurship is one of the pillars of the economy of the country and covers all sectors irrespective of ownership forms. Currently, this activity is increasingly spreading in rural areas. Our research results on transformation in the agricultural sector of the economy show that it is due to the development of entrepreneurship and strengthening entrepreneurial orientation and improvement of business environment economic entities in rural areas they were able to quickly and efficiently adapt to market conditions and to enter the foreign market, therefore, the purpose of the paper is to define the basic principles and the principles of entrepreneurial activity, its specifics and trends in agriculture and rural areas, to show the beginning and the development of collective and individual entrepreneurship. Methodology. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is the dialectical method of cognition and systematic approach, through which theoretical and methodological foundations of the development of business interactions in the agricultural sector in terms of institutional transformations. The results showed that in the article, the methodical design determining the nature and characteristics of agricultural business organically integrated the concept of institutional knowledge of the economic order, which allows us to identify the evolutionary concept of the formation of enterprises; the structure of the institutional system of entrepreneurship in the context of the evolution of this concept. Practical implications. The studied institutions create incentives for the development of science and education, encourage the mobility of production factors, and facilitate the transfer of scientific and technical information and the introduction of new technologies, promoting entrepreneurship and innovation. Conversely, inefficient institutions reduce the potential level of well-being, reduce reliability assurance of property rights, and enforce contracts. Value/originality. Given systematic and analytical characteristics of the effects, significance, dynamics of development of agrarian entrepreneurship in the context of institutional transformation, show the paradox, the stability of the institutional environment will not soon be reached, therefore, the dilemma of institutions remains unresolved. In general, the institutional transformation has ensured the formation of a mixed economy, the real pluralism of forms of ownership and agricultural management even if they are not yet fully institutionalized in the market. Transformations in the business environment we call the transformation of institutional conditions for the development of economic formations. Institute of entrepreneurship for the imperfections of the rules and conditions of economic interactions has not yet become mutually beneficial by the Institute for functional participants. Analysis of the development of agrarian enterprises in the conditions of institutional transformations proves the inconsistency of the institutional framework of entrepreneurial activity, which leads to a decrease in the number of enterprises – economic entities, non-transparent activities of business entities, the removal of landlords from participation in the activities of enterprises.

How to Cite

Odnorog, M., Kraus, N., & Kraus, K. (2019). THE FEATURES OF ENTREPRENEURIAL INTERACTIONS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN TERMS OF INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATIONS. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(4), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-171-181
Article views: 524 | PDF Downloads: 262

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

agricultural entrepreneurship, institutions, legal forms of enterprise, market relations, transformation processes in agrarian economy

References

Andrijchuk, V. G. (2013). Agropromyslovi formuvannja novogo typu v konteksti strategii rozvytku vitchyznjanogo silskogo gospodarstva [Agroindustrial formations of a new type in the context of the development strategy of domestic agriculture]. Ekonomika APK, 1, 3–15. (in Ukrainian)

Balakirjeva, O. M. (2015). Rozvytok pidpryjemnyctva v Ukraini: instytucijne seredovyshhe ta gromadska dumka naselennja [The development of entrepreneurship in Ukraine: institutional environment and public opinion of the population]. Ekonomika i prognozuvannja, 2, 7–24. (in Ukrainian)

Bergman, X. (1969). Razdelenie truda i specializacija v selskom hozjajstve [The division of labour and specialization in agriculture]. ( Ju. I. Timofeeva, O. G. Tropova, Trans). Moskva: “Progresc”. (in Russian)

Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton and Oxford : Princeton University Press, vol. 4, pp. 121–126.

Commons, J. (1931). Institutional Economics. American Economic Review, 21, 648–657.

Dementjev, V. V. (2009). Shho my doslidzhujemo, koly doslidzhujemo instytuty? [What we study when we investigate institutions?]. Ekonomichna teorija, 3, 75–92. (in Ukrainian)

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance. London: Printer publishers. Gadzalo, Ja. M., Lupenko, Ju. O., & Pugachov, M. I. (2016). Rozvytok ekonomiky silskogo gospodarstva Ukrainy v 2011-2015 rr. : nauk. dop. [The development of the rural economy in 2011 – 2015 : the scientific report]. Kyiv: NNC “IAE”. (in Ukrainian)

Grebenjuk, V. V. Pro neobhidnist rozvytku malogo pidpryjemnyctva jak osoblyvogo sektoru ekonomiky Ukrainy [About necessity of development of small entrepreneurship as a special sector of economy of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://nuwm.rv.ua/metods/asp/v39ek.html (in Ukrainian)

Gubeni, Ju. E. (2012). Pidpryjemnyctvo [Entrepreneurship]. Lviv: NVF “Ukrainski tehnologii'”. (in Ukrainian)

Ivashhuk, Ju. (2016). Emerdzhentnyj instytucijnyj porjadok v ekonomici ta jogo povedinkovi pidstavy [Emergenti institutional order of the economy and a behavioral Foundation of the]. Ekonomichna teorija, 3, 69–80. (in Ukrainian)

Jeggertsson, T. (2011). Znanija i teorija institucionalnyh izmenenij [Knowledge and the theory of institutional change]. Voprosy jekonomiki, 7, 4–16. (in Ukrainian)

Jerohin, S. A. (2002). Strukturna transformacija nacionalnoi ekonomiky (metodologichnyj aspekt) [Structural transformation of the national economy (methodological aspects)]. Kyiv: Svit znan. (in Ukrainian)

Khandker, S. R., & Koolwal, G. B. (2016). How has microcredit supported agriculture? Evidence using panel data from Bangladesh. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 47(2), 157–168.

Kredisov, V. A. (2003). Pidpryjemnyctvo – vyrishalnyj faktor rozvytku krain z perehidnoju ekonomikoju [Entrepreneurship is a decisive factor in the development of transition economies]. Kyiv: Znannja Ukrainy. (in Ukrainian)

Lopatynskyj, Ju. M. (2006). Transformacija agrarnogo sektora: instytucionalni zasady [The transformation of the agricultural sector: institutional framework]. Chernivtsi: Ruta. (in Ukrainian)

Lupenko, Ju. O. (2012). Formuvannja perspektyvnoi modeli silskogo gospodarstva Ukrainy [The formation of a prospective model of agriculture in Ukraine]. Ekonomika APK, 11, 10–14. (in Ukrainian)

Lupenko, Ju. O. (2016). Rozvytok pidpryjemnyctva i kooperacii: instytucionalnyj aspekt [The transformation of the agricultural sector: institutional framework]. Kyiv: NNC “IAE”. (in Ukrainian)

Malik, M. J. (2011). Instytuty ta instytucii u rozvytku agrarnoi sfery ekonomiky [Institutions and institutions in the development of the agrarian sector of economy]. Ekonomika APK, 7, 169–177. (in Ukrainian)

Malik, M. J. (2013). Instytuty ta instytucii u rozvytku integracijnyh procesiv v agrarnij sferi [Institutionsand i nstitutions in the development of integration processes in agrarian sphere]. Ekonomika APK, 4, 86–93.

(in Ukrainian)

Mazur, A. G. (2012). Naukovo-teoretychni zasady systemnyh transformacij v nacionalnij ekonomici [Scientifictheoretical bases of systemic transformations in the national economy]. Ekonomika APK, 5, 158–165. (in Ukrainian)

Mesel-Veseljak, V. Ja. (2010). Agrarna reforma i organizacijno-ekonomichni transformacii v silskomu gospodarstvi [Agrarian reform and the organizational and economic transformation in agriculture]. Ekonomika APK, 4, 3–18. (in Ukrainian)

Palmer, T. D. (2014). Moralnist kapitalizmu. Te, pro shho vy ne pochujete vid vykladachiv [The morality of capitalism. What you will not hear from the teachers]. Kyiv: Osnovy. (in Ukrainian)

Pashaver, B. J. (2013). Koncentracija ta efektyvnist silskogo gospodarstva [Concentration and the efficiency of agriculture]. Ekonomika APK, 1, 16–23. (in Ukrainian)

Polterovich, V. M. (2001). Transplantacija jekonomicheskih institutov [Transplantation of economic institutions]. Jekonomicheskaja nauka sovremennoj Rossii, 3, 24–50. (in Russian)

Prutska, O. O. (2003). Instytucionalizm i problemy ekonomichnoi povedinky v perehidnij ekonomici [Institutionalism and problems of economic behavior in transition economies]. Kyiv: Logos. (in Ukrainian)

Rodzhers Everett, M. (2009). Dyfuzija innovacij [The diffusion of innovations]. (V. Starka, Trans). Kyiv: Vyd. dim “Kyjevo-Mogyljanska akademija”. (in Ukrainian)

Sabluk, P. T. (1997). Osoblyvosti agrarnoi reformy v Ukraini [The features of agrarian reform in Ukraine]. Kyiv: ZAT “Nichlava”. (in Ukrainian)

Shpykuljak, O. G. (2009). Instytucii agrarnogo rynku [Institutions of the agricultural market]. Kyiv: NNC “IAE” UAAN. (in Ukrainian)

Shpykuljak, O. G. (2016). Instytucijna bezpeka ekonomichnyh agentiv i rynkovyj mehanizm [Institutional security of economic agents and market mechanism]. Ekonomika. Finansy. Menedzhment: aktualni pytannja nauky i praktyky, 5, 80–93. (in Ukrainian)

Schumpeter, J. (2011). Teorija ekonomichnogo rozvytku: doslidzhennja prybutkiv, kapitalu, kredytu, vidsotka ta ekonomichnogo cyklu [The theory of economic development: a Study of profits, capital, credit, interest and economic cycle]. (V. Starka, Trans). Kyiv: Vydavnychyj dim “Kyjevo-Mogyljanska akademija”. (in Ukrainian)

Varnalij, Z. S. (2006). Osnovy pidpryjemnyctva : navch. posib. [Fundamentals of entrepreneurship : tutorial]. Kyiv: Znannja-Pres. (in Ukrainian)

Weber, M. (2016). Hozjajstvo i obshhestvo: ocherki ponimajushhej sociologii [Economy and society: essays on the understanding of sociology]. Jekonomicheskaja sociologija, 5(17), 13–28. (in Russian)

Zbarskyj, V. K. (2015). Ekonomika pidpryjemstva [Enterprise economy]. Kyiv: KyMU. (in Ukrainian)

Issue
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2019): Baltic Journal of Economic Studies