MODELS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF SPONSORSHIP AND PATRONAGE IN THE EU

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 30, 2019

  Iryna Antoshyna

  Alina Bondarenko

Abstract

Today, patronage is the key source of non-governmental support of the socio-cultural advancement of the state because, as the world’s practice shows, the state funding is often not enough for conserving and developing the national and cultural heritage. Across the world and Europe, increasing attention is paid to the traditions of charity, corporate philanthropy is in progress, and business ethics are growing. In developed countries, the pursuit of charity activity is caused by a high level of social responsibility of business entities. Both large corporations and wealthy people establish charitable funds or provide a good deal of money for relevant purposes. The problems of patronage or sponsorship as means for guaranteeing the realization of socio-cultural programmes, research initiatives and continual activity of not-for-profit organizations are topical and need an extension study in terms of conditions and prospects for the development. The purpose of the article is the analysis of the experience of administrative regulation of patronage and sponsorship in different countries and its growth potential in Ukraine in the context of international integration and scientific and technological progress. The situation is complicated by the fact that this regulatory scope has originated more recently in the world’s practice, and many problems remain unsettled. For example, let’s consider some forms of financial rewards used in the rest of the world. In the developed countries, there are models of cooperation with a private fund in the social, cultural, academic and other spheres of social life. They are as follows: the state as a leader; private fund as a leader; partnership and functional division of labour between the state and capital. In social practices, they usually co-exist with a dominant one of them. The first model prevails in France and Italy, the second – in the USA, the third – in the Federal Republic of Germany. Recently, there has been a gradual transition to the third model, which will become dominant in Western countries. Compared to Western Europe, there has been no moral rehabilitation of wealth in Ukraine, which has affected the motivation of charity. It is noteworthy that in the last decade, especially in European countries, state and state-social funds, which are financed using budget funds and the contributions of patrons, have been created. In general, analyzing various forms of patronage and sponsorship in the field of culture of the countries of the European region, it can be argued that in modern Western countries there is a sweeping trend to decrease direct state support of culture by indirect. The attraction of funds of entrepreneurs and non-governmental organizations in various forms is purposefully stimulated by state cultural policy, laws on patronage. In Ukraine, state intervention in the charity area is minimal. It is limited to the statutory regulation of charity activity, registration and accounting of charity organizations. At the same time, some specific normalization of patronage and sponsorship is next to none because it is distinguished among other charity activities mostly by patrons, sponsors, and mass media.

How to Cite

Antoshyna, I., & Bondarenko, A. (2019). MODELS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF SPONSORSHIP AND PATRONAGE IN THE EU. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(5), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-18-27
Article views: 483 | PDF Downloads: 306

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

sponsorship, administration model, legal regulation, private fund, art market, social development

References

Arts Econimics и Art Basel (2019). The Art Basel and UBS Global Art Market Report 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.artbasel.com/news/art-market-report

Analytics (2017). Social responsibility of business. Information and analytical material. Retrieved from: http://www.svb.org.ua

Baumol, W. J., & Bowen, W. G. (1966). Performing Arts: the Economic Dilemma. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 582 p.

Congressman Ron Paul, 14th District of Texas (1962). In Praise of Private Charity. United States House of Representatives. Retrieved from: http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1962:in-praise-of-private-charity&catid=62:texas-straight-talk.

Demeshko, M. (2018). Zarubizhnyy dosvid administratyvno-pravovoho rehulyuvannya metsenatstva i sponsorstva [Foreign experience of administrative and legal regulation of patronage and sponsorship]. Naukovyy visnyk publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava, 6(1), 242–248. (in Ukrainian)

Demeshko, M. (2018). Normatyvno-pravove rehulyuvannya metsenat•stva i sponsorstva v Ukrayini [Legal regulation of patronage and sponsorship in Ukraine]. Naukovij visnik Nacionalnoi akademii vnutrisnih sprav, 4 (109), 271–284. (in Ukrainian)

Konstytutsiia Ukrainy (1996) vid 28 cherv. 1996 r. No. 254k/96-VR [Constitution of Ukraine from June 28, 1996, No. 254k/96-VR]. Retrieved from: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80 (in Ukrainian)

Nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy (2013). "Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro Reiestr neprybutkovykh ustanov ta orhanizatsii": vid 24 sich. 2013 r. No 37 [Order of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine "On Approval of the Regulation on the Register of Non-Profit Institutions and Organizations" from January 24, 2013, No 37]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0267-13 (in Ukrainian)

Number of Public Charities in the United States, (2010). Urban Institute, National Centre for Charitable Statistics. Retrieved from: http://nccsdataweb.urban.org/PubApps/profileDrillDown.php?state=US&rpt=PC.

Pasichnyk, M. S. (2005). Istoriia Ukrainy: derzhavnytski protsesy, rozvytok kultury ta politychni perspektyvy [History of Ukraine: state processes, development of culture and political perspectives]. Kyiv: Znannia. (in Ukrainian)

Proekt Zakonu Ukrainy "Pro metsenatstvo u sferi fizychnoi kultury ta sportu" (2017) vid 1 serp. 2017 r. No 6770-1 [Draft Law of Ukraine "About patronage in the field of physical culture and sports" from August 1, 2017, No 6770-1]. Retrieved from http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/JH5821AA.html (in Ukrainian)

Shveda, D. (2018). Dosvid zarubizhnykh krayin u sferi derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya metsenatskoyi diyalnosti [Experience of foreign countries in the sphere of state regulation of patronage activity]. Retrieved from: http://libfor.com/index.php?newsid=318 (in Ukrainian)

Venglovskiy, A. (2005). Dary svyshe [Gifts from above]. Biznes, 43, 86–90. (in Russian)

Slaboshpytskyi, M. (2001). Ukrainski metsenaty. Narysy z istorii ukrainskoi kultury [Ukrainian philanthropists. Essays on the history of Ukrainian culture]. Kyiv: Yaroslaviv Val. (in Ukrainian)

Sirotin, A. (2005). Metsenatstvo v USA [Patronage in the USA]. Chayka, 2, 2–9. (in Ukrainian)

Smolyak, I. (1996). Blahodiynytstvo vdoma i za rubezhem [Charity at Home and Abroad]. Polityka i chas, 9, 54–57. (in Ukrainian)

Social Responsibility – The Basis of Business Philosophy (2016). Retrieved from: www.svb.org.ua/reviews/sotsialna-vidpovidalnist-osnova-filosofii-biznesu

Sofiyenko, A.V. (2012). Sotsialʹna vidpovidalʹnistʹ biznesu: rozuminnya ta suchasni tendentsiyi [Social responsibility of business: understanding and current trends. Economic innovation]. Ekonomichni innovatsiyi, 47, 297–301. (in Ukrainian)

Tulchynskii, G. L., & Shekova, E. L. (2007). Menedjment v sfere kultury [Management in the field of culture] (3rd ed.). SPb.: Lan; Izd-vo planeta muzyki. (in Russian)

United Nations Global Compact (2017). Retrieved from: http://www.unglobalcompact.org./participants/search.

Volkov, V. V., Korniichuk, V. P., & Khomiak, K. D. (2008). Stratehichnyi vystavkovyi menedzhment [Strategic exhibition management]. Kyiv: Mizhnar. ekonom. un-t. (in Ukrainian)

Yurchenko, O. (2016). Podatok na mylostynyu [Charity tax]. Visnyk podatkovoyi sluzhby Ukrayiny, 19, 4–7. (in Ukrainian)

Zakon Ukrainy (2012). "Pro blahodiinu diialnist ta blahodiini orhanizatsii": vid 5 lyp. 2012 r. No 5073-VI [Law of Ukraine "About the blessing of that kind of blessing of the organization" from July 5, 2012, No 5073-VI]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5073-17 (in Ukrainian)

Zakon Ukrainy (2012). "Pro hromadski obiednannia": vid 22 berez. 2012 r. No 4572-VI [Law of Ukraine "About a lot of things" from March 13, 2012, No 4572-VI]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4572-17 (in Ukrainian)