CONCEPTUAL APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING BUDGET MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC REGULATION SYSTEM

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: Dec 26, 2019
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-90-99

  Nataliia Melnychuk

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-3614

  Svitlana Zalyubovska

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-8165

Abstract

Based on the generalization of existing conceptual approaches to the budget management understanding in the public regulation system, a conceptual approach «Entity-Relationship-Result» Management is proposed, which made it possible to reveal the main trends in the budget management development in the public regulation system, determine its structural elements, deepen the budget management essence, characterize scientific approaches to understanding the components and principles of budget management, state your own vision of its methods and classification features. From this, a conceptual semantic model of the budget management understanding in the public regulation system is developed reflecting the list of budget management components in the public regulation system, their close relationship and coherence. The purpose of the article is the development of a conceptual approach to the budget management development in the public regulation system. Theoretical and methodological principles of the budget management development in the public regulation system is a subject of investigation. Research design. Within the article, a set of general scientific and special research methods is used. When forming the conceptual categorical apparatus, methods of analysis and synthesis, generalization and scientific abstraction were used. Abstract-logical method was used for the generalization of theoretical foundations of budget management; system analysis was used to characterize the main components, functions, principles, techniques and budget management methods; historical-logical method, the method of induction and deduction allowed to explore the conceptual approach to understanding the importance of budget management in the public regulation system; graphical method was used to visualize the results of the study. Conclusions. Therefore, budget management is one of the tools to overcome problems, which arise in the process of formation and use of budget funds in the conditions of their scarcity. The matter of justification of optimal and effective methods and tools of effective budgetary management is important not only for Ukraine but also for other states, in particular the post-Soviet space. At the same time, the global experience does not give universal decisions on the budget management organization, since each state has its own budgetary system, peculiarities of building a budgetary system and its conceptual management approaches that can be used in the budgetary sphere (New Public Management, Good Governance, Multi-level Governance, Network Management and E-government). It is proved that, although budget management is widely used in financial science, a conceptual approach to its understanding has not been formed yet. Critical analysis of the literature has made it possible to substantiate that in the study of budget management, conceptual approaches of public administration are used, which do not allow revealing all its peculiarities in full. We have offered our own conceptual approach «Entity-Relationship-Result» Management, which made it possible to reveal the main trends in the budget management development in the public regulation system; determine its structural elements, deepen the budget management essence (a complex of interrelated functions, principles, methods, techniques and procedures used by the authorized bodies and aimed at the development and implementation of management decisions in drawing up, reviewing, approving, executing the state budget and the budgets of its territorial and administrative units to ensure efficient use of budgetary funds), offer scientific approaches to understanding the components and principles of budget management, state your own vision of its methods and classification features. This helped to build a conceptual semantic model of understanding budget management in the public regulation system. The proposed model reflects the list of budget management components in the public regulation system, their close relationship and coherence, and which are aimed at ensuring the functions performance of public authorities and local self-government bodies.

How to Cite

Melnychuk, N., & Zalyubovska, S. (2019). CONCEPTUAL APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING BUDGET MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC REGULATION SYSTEM. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(5), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-90-99
Article views: 671 | PDF Downloads: 401

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

budget management, budget, state regulation, public finances, budgetary funds, public regulation

References

Avetisian, I. A. (2016). Biudzhetnyi menedzhment: sushchnost, istoriia i problemy sovershenstvovaniia v sovremennoi Rossii [Budget management: essence, history and problems on improvement in modern Russia]. Problemy razvitiia territorii – Problems of the territory development, 2 (82), 137–153. (in Russian)

Babinova, О. О. (2007). Kriterii otsinky efektyvnosti diialnosti orhaniv mistsevoho samovriiaduvannia: svitovyi dosvid ta Ukraina [Criteria for evaluating the performance of local governments: world experience and Ukraine]. Stratehichni priorytety – Strategic Priorities, 2 (3), 73–79. (in Ukrainian)

Baskakov, А. Yu. (2016). Naukovi pidkhody do vyznachennia ekonomichnoho zmistu ponittia «biudzhetnyi menedzhment» [Scientific approaches to the definition of the economic concept of «budget management»]. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia «Ekonomika» – Scientific notes of the National University «Ostrog Academy». Series «Economics», 3 (31), 92–95. (in Ukrainian)

Bogolib, Т. М. (2015). Biudzhetna polityka yak instrument makroekonomichnoi stabilnosti [Budgetary policy as an instrument of macroeconomic stability]. Еkonomichnyi chasopys XXI – Еconomic Journal-XXI, 3–4 (1), 84–87. (in Ukrainian)

Borovikova, Ye. V. (2008). Teoretiko-metodologicheskie polozheniia orzanizatsii biudzgetnogo menedzhmenta [Theoretical and methodological provisions of the budget management organization]. Finansy i kredit – Finances and Credit, 11, 32–34. (in Russian)

Fedosov, V. (Ed.) (2004). Biudzhetnyi menedzhment [Budget Management]. Kyiv: KNEU. (in Ukrainian)

Malik, S. O. (Ed.) (2012). Biudzhetnyi menedzhment [Budget Management]. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)

Venger, V. V. (2009). Finansy [Finances]. Kyiv: Center of Educational Literature. (in Ukrainian)

Demianyshyn, V. (2007). Skladannia proektu biudzhetu derzhavy: prahmatyka, problematyka ta shliakhy udskonalennia [Development of the draft state budget: pragmatics, problems and ways for improvements]. Svit finansiv – The World of Finances, 4 (13), 100–115. (in Ukrainian)

Demianyshyn, V. (2008). Teoretychni zasady biudzhetnoho mekhanizmu derzhavy [Theoretical foundations of the state’s budget mechanism]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho torhovelno-ekonomichnoho universytetu – Вulletin of the Kyiv National University of Trade and Commerce, 1, 56–67. (in Ukrainian)

Yermakova, Ye. А. (2010). Biudzhetnyi menedzhment i ego funktsionalnye elementy [Budget management and its functional elements]. Finansy i kredit – Finances and Credit, 20, 2–7. (in Russian)

Indutenko, A. N. (2007). Biudzhetnyi menedzhment v usloviiakh formirovaniia sistemy biudzhetirovaniia, orientirovannogo na rezultat [Budget management in the conditions of the creating the result-oriented budgeting system]. Finansy i kredit – Finances and Credit, 30, 2–8. (in Russian)

Klets, L. Ye. (2007). Biudzhetnyi menedzhment [Budget Management]. Kyiv: Center of Educational Literature. (in Ukrainian)

Kovaleva, Т. М. (2003). Osnovy orzanizatsii biudzhetnogo menedzhmenta v subekte Federatsii [Foundations of the budget management organization in the entity of the Russian Federation]. Finansy i kredit – Finances and Credit, 6, 141–146. (in Russian)

Myronova, Т. L., Dobrovolska, O. P., Protsai, A. F., & Kolodiy, S. Yu. (2006). Upravlinnia rozvytkom rehionu [Management of the region development]. Kyiv: Center of Educational Literature. (in Ukrainian)

Mykhaialenko, S. V. (2010). Biudzhetnyi menedzhment: stan ta otsinka efektyvnosti [Budget management: state and efficiency evaluation]. Odessa: VVV, Druk Pivden. (in Ukrainian)

Mykhailenko, S. V. (2011). Biudzhetnyi menedzhment: vyznachennia, pryntsypy, funktsii [Budget management: definitions, principles, functions]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky – Topical Issues of Economics, 3 (117), 223–229. (in Ukrainian)

Oparin, V. M., & Safonova, L. D. (1998). Sutnist ta skladovi biudzhetnoho menedzhmentu [Essence and components of budget management]. Finansy Ukrainy – Finances of Ukraine, 2, 60–67. (in Ukrainian)

Pankevych, L. V., Zvarych, M. A., & Mohyliak, P. Ya. (2006). Biudzhetnyi menedzhment [Budget Management]. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)

Pantelieiev V. P. (2013). Biudzhetnyi menedzhment [Budget Management]. Kharkiv: KhNU named after V. N. Karazin. (in Ukrainian)

Timirkhanova, L. M. (2007). Soderzhanie biudzhetnoho menedzhmenta [Content of budget management]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta – Journal of Udmurtia University, 2, 255–258. (in Russian)

Tymchenko, І. О. (2013). Rehionalnyi menedzhment [Regional Manegement]. Retrieved from: http://zavantag.com/docs/2247/index-634793.html?page=1 (accessed 21 September 2019).

Iashyna, N. I. (2004). Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy upravleniia biudzhetom: riski dokhodnoi chasti biudzheta [Theoretical and methodological foundations of budget management: risks to the revenue part of the budget]. Finansy i kredit – Finances and Credit, 8 (146). Retrieved from: http://www.fin-izdat.m/journal/fc (accessed 21 September 2019).

Guttentag, J. R., & Herring, J. (1984). Credit rationing and financial disorder. Journal of Finance, 39 (5), 1359–1382.

Hokayema, J., & Kairouzb, A. (2014). Euro-Med: Public Management and Good Local Governance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 528–535.

Juncos, A., & Pomorska, K. (2010). Secretariat, facilitator or policy entrepreneur? Role perceptions of officials of the Council Secretariat. European Integration online Papers, 14 (7), 26.

Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multi-level governance in the EC. In A. Cafruny and G. Rosenthal (Eds.). The State of the European Community: The Maastricht Debate and Beyond. Boulder.

Matei, L. (2006). Management public (2nd ed.). Bucharest.

Melnychuk, N. (2016). Budget management types under the current conditions. Intellectual Archive, 5 (4), 63–72. Toronto: ShinyWordCorp., Canada.

Peterson, J., & Jone, E. (1999). «Decision Making in an Enlarging European Union» in Sperling, J. (Ed.) Two Tiers or Two Speeds? The European Security Order and the Enlargement of the European Union and NATO. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

Peterson, J., & O'Toole, Jr. L. J. (2001). Federal Governance in the United States and the European Union: a Policy Network Perspective. In K. Nicolaïdis, R. Howse (Eds.), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union. Oxford.

Peterson, J. (2003). Policy Networks. Politikwissenschaft. Political Science Series. Vienna, 6. Retrieved from: https://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_90.pdf (accessed 21 October 2019).

Premchand, A. (1993). Public Expendimre Management. Washington: IMF.

World Bank Governance for Sustainable Human Development (1992). Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics.

Issue
Vol. 5 No. 5 (2019): Baltic Journal of Economic Studies