MODERN TRENDS IN GOVERNANCE OF STATE OWNERSHIP RELATIONS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: Dec 26, 2019
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-155-164

  Iurii Umantsiv

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0788-7110

  Larysa Lebedeva

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8632-5460

  Anastasiia Mytrofanova

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5427-8927

Abstract

Today, the diversity of functions of the state is objectively expanding, especially in the context of socially oriented economies of developed countries. Effective governance of state property serves as a solid foundation for successful performance of the state functions. The chosen topic is of particular relevance in the context of Ukraine's transformational economy. The subject of research is the system of economic relations of state property. Methodology. In the course of the study, a general philosophical dialectical method was used to find contradictions in the phenomena and sources of their development, such as the essence of state property and its contents. Common scientific methods were also used: analysis and synthesis; comparative analysis; statistical methods for calculating the structure and dynamics of indicators of condition and development of state property. The overall system for assessing the socio-economic efficiency of state property management was carried out on the basis of microeconomic indicators and macroeconomic indicators (indicators of economic and social efficiency). The purpose of the paper is to reveal the trends of development of state ownership relations in the European countries as well as in Ukraine, in particular, the difficulties of the process of managing them, as well as to formulate possible ways to overcome such difficulties. Conclusions of the study. Today, the importance of the state as a public institute is objectively increasing in the most economically developed countries. By succeeding in achieving positive institutional changes in ownership relations (creating favorable conditions for SMEs, developing market infrastructure, conducting moderate privatization of state property, transferring state-owned enterprises to market tracks, maintaining policies for protecting national interests, etc.) the grounds for economic growth and improvement of the social sphere in France and Poland were made. Though the conducted analysis showed that the development of state property in Ukraine is contradictory, it has the following problems: ambiguous character of privatization; low efficiency of state property governance; insufficient efficiency of work of enterprises with state ownership; institutional problems. Overall, the socio-economic efficiency of state property governance in Ukraine needs improvement. Thus, the state policy of property governance should include, in particular, the following steps: development of a national model of governance, as well as strategies for the development of state property; organization of state property management entities; development of a system of criteria and indicators for assessing not only the economic but also the social efficiency of state property governance.

How to Cite

Umantsiv, I., Lebedeva, L., & Mytrofanova, A. (2019). MODERN TRENDS IN GOVERNANCE OF STATE OWNERSHIP RELATIONS. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(5), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-155-164
Article views: 450 | PDF Downloads: 297

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

state property, role of state in economy, state corporate rights, socio-economic efficiency, privatization

References

Analitychna dovidka pro robotu Fondu derzhavnogho majna Ukrajiny ta khid pryvatyzaciji derzhavnogho majna za 9 misjaciv 2018 roku (2018). [Analytical note on the work of the State Property Fund of Ukraine and the course of privatization of state property for 9 months of 2018]. Kyiv: SPFU. (in Ukrainian)

Belas, M. (2016). Yak vidbuvalasya pryvatyzatsiya derzhavnykh pidpryyemstv u Polʹshchi [How the privatization of state-owned enterprises in Poland was made?]. Yevropeyska Pravda. Retrieved from: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/articles/2016/05/30/7049990/ (accessed 29 October 2019).

Bokovets, V. V., Zamkova, N. L., & Makhnachova, N. M. (2017). Assessment of the effectiveness of enterprise management components in modern conditions. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 4, 27–32.

Cirel, S. V. (2006). «Vlast-sobstvennost» v trudah rossijskih istorikov i jekonomistov [«Power-ownership» in the writings of Russian historians and economists]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost, 3, 119–131.

Coibion, O. & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2015). Information Rigidity and the Expectations Formation Process: A Simple Framework and New Facts. American Economic Review, 105, 2644–2678. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20110306

Cviklova, L. (2016). Evolution of Property Rights System in East and Central Europe Through Institutional Perspective. Proceedings from: The 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from: https://sgemsocial.org/ssgemlib/spip.php?article3309 (accessed 29 October 2019).

Fedorenko, A. V. (2014). Upravlinnja derzhavnymy korporatyvnymy pravamy [Management of state corporate rights]. Ekonomika i proghnozuvannja, 4, 23–37. (in Ukrainian)

Gerasymenko, A., Borovyk, I., & Afendikova, S. (2017). The methodology of competition assessment. Economic Annals-XXI, 5–6(165), 52–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V165-11

Gorodnichenko, Y., Sheremirov, V., & Talavera, O. (2018). Price Setting in Online Markets: Does IT Click? Journal of European Economic Association, 16(6), 1764–1811.

Justesen, M. K. (2015). Making and Breaking Property Rights: Coalitions, Veto Players, and the Institutional Foundation of Markets. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 171(2), 238–262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1628/093245615X14273596658928

Khokhlov, M. P. (2008). Osnovy ekonomiky rozderzhavlennja i pryvatyzaciji [Fundamentals of the economy of privatization and privatization]. Kharkiv: Vyd. KhNEU. (in Ukrainian)

Lazzarini, S. G., & Musacchio, A. (2018). State Ownership Reinvented? Explaining Performance Differences Between State-owned and Private Firms. Corporate Governance – An International Review, 26(4), 255–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12239

Mayster, A. (2014). Efektyvne upravlinnja derzhavnymy korporatyvnymy pravamy v Ukrajini: problemy ta shljakhy vyrishennja [Effective management of state corporate rights in Ukraine: problems and solutions]. Rynok cinnykh paperiv Ukrajiny, 1–2, 47–54. (in Ukrainian)

Mukha, R. A. (2012). Upravlinnja derzhavnymy korporatyvnymy pravamy v ghospodarsjkykh tovarystvakh: avtoreferat dysertaciji na zdobuttja naukovogho stupenja kandydata ekonomichnykh nauk [Management of State Corporate Rights in Business: Abstract of the Thesis for the Candidate's Degree in Economic Sciences]. Rivne: Nac. un-t vod. ghosp-va ta pryrodokorystuvannja). (in Ukrainian)

Mytrofanova, A. S., & Reshetnjak, N. B. (2019). Osoblyvosti systemy upravlinnja korporatyvnymy pravamy derzhavy v Ukrajini [Features of the system of management of corporate rights of the state in Ukraine]. Biznes Inform, 3, 63–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2019-3-63-68. (in Ukrainian)

Nwabueze, U., & Mileski, J. (2018). Аchieving competitive advantage through effective communication in a global environment. Journal of International Studies, 11 (1), 50–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/4

Palekhova, V. A. (2008). Polskyy dosvid perekhodu do rynku: uroky dlya Ukrayiny [Polish experience of transition to the market: lessons for Ukraine]. Istorychnyy arkhiv. Naukovi studiyi: Zb. nauk. pr., 2, 62–72 (in Ukrainian)

Paskhaver, O. J. (2008). Upravlinnja derzhavnoju vlasnistju v Ukrajini: analiz i rekomendaciji z udoskonalennja [State Property Management in Ukraine: Analysis and Recommendations for Improvement]. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)

Popov, O. Je. (2009). Teoretyko-metodologhichni ta konceptualjni zasady formuvannja orghanizacijno-ekonomichnogho mekhanizmu korporatyvnogho upravlinnja [Theoretical-methodological and conceptual principles of formation of organizational-economic mechanism of corporate governance]. Kharkiv: FOP Aleksandrova K. M.; VD «INZhEK». (in Ukrainian)

Shirjaeva, R. I. (2011). Institucional'noe obespechenie realizacii potenciala gosudarstvennoj sobstvennosti [Institutional support for the realization of state property potential]. Voprosy jekonomiki i prava, 4, 154–158. (in Russian)

Solovjan, Ju. (2011). Upravlinnja derzhavnymy korporatyvnymy pravamy: ocinka efektyvnosti [Management of state corporate rights: evaluation of efficiency]. Visnyk Kyjivsjkogho nacionaljnogho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, 121–122, 103–108. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VKNU_Ekon_2011_121-122_30 (accessed 04 November 2019).

State Property Fund of Ukraine (2019). Rejestr korporatyvnykh prav derzhavy [Register of corporate rights of the state]. Retrieved from: http://www.spfu.gov.ua/ru/documents/docs-list/spf-management-Reestr-korporativnih-prav.html?page=27&per-page=10 (accessed 04 November 2019).

Ticha, M. (2009). Property Rights and Economic Prosperity - An Institutional View. Proceedings from: The 7th International Conference on Economic Policy in the European Union Member Countries. Trojanovice, Czech Republic.

Tkachuk, O., & Khachatryan, V. (2019). World spatial features of doing business. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 234–241. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-2-234-241

Umantsiv, Iu., & Ishchenko, O. (2017). Banking Sector and Economy of CEE Countries: Development Features and Correlation.Journal Of Settlements And Spatial Planning, vol. 8, no. 1, 59–70.

Vasilev, L. S. (1993). Istorija drevnego Vostoka [The history of Ancient East]. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola. (in Russian)

Volchik, V. V. (2014). Institucional'nye podhody k issledovaniju sobstvennosti: vozmozhen li sintez? [Institutional Approaches to Property Research: Is Synthesis Possible?]. TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2(12), 22–33.

Zawojska, A., & Siudek, T. (2013). Property Rights and Macroeconomic Performance in Central and Eastern European EU Member States. Proceedings from: International Scientific Conference on Economic Science for Rural Development. Latvia. Retrieved from: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=LV2013000480 (accessed 04 November 2019).

Zvit pro robotu Fondu derzhavnogho majna Ukrajiny ta khid pryvatyzaciji derzhavnogho majna u 2017 roci (2018). [Report on the work of the State Property Fund of Ukraine and the progress of privatization of state property in 2017]. Kyiv: SPFU. (in Ukrainian)

Issue
Vol. 5 No. 5 (2019): Baltic Journal of Economic Studies