THE ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES IN THE NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: Mar 16, 2020
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-51-58

  Olena Kolomytseva

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6769-0590

  Anna Pavlovska

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7496-4035

Abstract

The intensification of innovations required system approach, including at the macro level, which resulted in creation of national innovation systems (NIS). Such systems are designed to support and ensure innovation processes, including creation of favorable conditions for interaction of their different actors (various kinds of business; universities; scientific institutions; state). Each of the actors performs its own role in NIS, which contributes to the total innovation productivity. Methodology. Universities playing a specific role in NIS are an integral subject of innovative activity. Despite considerable attention to this problematics, this role is disclosed in a fragmented manner. Therefore, the research is focused on clarification of theoretical and methodological background to study of the role of universities in NIS, justification of the evolution of universities and definition of their functions in the NIS structure, specification of the key aspects of the disclosure of this role implementation. Results. This paper highlights the increasing importance of education in innovation processes and changed requirements to it, which causes respective changes in curricula, organizational models and approaches to external cooperation with science and business. In this context, the paper discloses the key aspects of interaction between universities and entrepreneurial sector, as well as evolution of universities by a number of features (dominant functions of science; universities as knowledge providers; universities as providers of high-skilled employees; universities as mobilizers of entrepreneurs). The major contradictions of the concept of entrepreneurial university are highlighted. Practical implications. The paper describes the key functions of universities in NIS, including education, R&D, development and promotion of innovations. It is suggested considering the role of universities in NIS within the framework of six key aspects: integrators of ecosystem for innovations; providers of innovations for economy; platform for cooperation; concentrators of resources needed for innovations; mechanism for knowledge transfer and source of skills; pillars of the advanced science and providers of new knowledge. In this context, the emphasis is laid on the need to develop resource and infrastructural potential of universities as well as innovation capabilities. Value/ originality. When summarzing the functions of universities, it is suggested taking into consideration the impact of university activities on the local economic development (regional, urban economy), and considering their role in interaction with international environment. A number of practical recommendations to improve the efficiency of educational and innovative activities in NIS are identified. This will be a basis for future researches.

How to Cite

Kolomytseva, O., & Pavlovska, A. (2020). THE ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES IN THE NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-51-58
Article views: 1369 | PDF Downloads: 844

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

national innovation system, universities, innovative entrepreneurship, ecosystem

References

Altbach, Ph. G. (2013). Advancing the National and Global Knowledge Economy: the Role of Research Universities in Developing Countries. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 1–15.

Bedford, T., Kinnaird, Y., Migueis, R., Paolucci, E., Wijlands, B., & Vos, A. (2018). Role of Universities of Science and Technology in Innovation Ecosystems: Towards Mission 3.1. White Paper. Leuven: CESAER.

Christensen, C. M., & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out Hardcover. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Datta, S., Saad, M., & Sarpong, D. (2019). National systems of innovation, innovation niches, and diversity in university systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 27–36.

De Silva, M. (2014). Academic Entrepreneurship and Traditional Academic Duties: Synergy or Rivalry? Studies in higher education, 1, 1–15.

Deiaco, E., Hughes, A., & Mckelvey, M. (2012). Universities as strategic actors in the knowledge economy. Cambridge J. of Economics, 36(3), 525–541.

Etzkowitz, H., Germain-Alamartine, E., Keel, J., Kumar, C., Nelson, S. K., & Albats, E. (2019). Entrepreneurial university dynamics: Structured ambivalence, relative deprivation and institution-formation in the Stanford innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 159–171.

Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2010). The Race between Education and Technology. Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press.

Huang, S.-P. (2018). Effects of Innovative Education on Innovation Capability and Organizational Performance in High-Tech Industry. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 777–784.

Khanin, I., Shevchenko, G., Bilozubenko, V., & Korneyev, M. (2019). A cognitive model for managing the national innovation system parameters based on international comparisons (the case of the EU countries). Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 153–162.

Katz, J., & Spence, R. (2008). Chile: Universities and the National Innovation System. Working Papers wp287. University of Chile, Department of Economics.

Kochetkov, D., Larionova, V., & Vukovic, D. (2017). Entrepreneurial capacity of universities and its impact on regional economic growth. Economy of Region, 13, 477–488.

Lassnigg, L., Hartl, J., Unger, M., & Schwarzenbacher, I. (2017). Higher Education Institutions and Knowledge Triangle: Improving the Interaction between Education, Research and Innovation. IHS Sociological Series. Working Paper 118. Retrieved from: https://irihs.ihs.ac.at/id/eprint/4228/1/rs118.pdf (accessed 05 November 2019).

Marginson, S. (2010). Higher Education in the Global Knowledge Economy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(5), 6962–6980.

Polyakov, M., Bilozubenko, V., Korneyev M., & Shevchenko, G. (2019). Selection of parameters for multifactor model in the knowledge economy marketing (country level). Innovative Marketing, 15(1), 89–99.

Radosevic, S., & Petraite, M. (2006). The Role of Higher Education in National Innovation Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. In: D. Bridges, ed., Higher education in national innovation. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 35–60.

Rangaa, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262.

Singh, A., Wong, P.-K., & Ho, Y.-P. (2015). The role of universities in the national innovation systems of China and the East Asian NIEs: An exploratory analysis of publications and patenting data. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(2), 140–156.

Unger, M., & Polt, W. (2017). The Knowledge Triangle between Research, Education and Innovation – A Conceptual Discussion. Foresight and STI Governance. Journal of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, 11(2), 10–26.

Valero, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2019) The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. Economics of Education Review, 68, 53–67.

Weber, A. (2011). The role of education in knowledge economies in developing countries. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2589–2594.

Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016) Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(1), 31–42.

Issue
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Baltic Journal of Economic Studies