THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES FOR ASSESSMENT THE READINESS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS FOR CHANGES

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: Mar 16, 2020
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-80-86

  Anatolii Mazaraki

  Yuliya Drozdova

  Sergey Bay

Abstract

The article is devoted to theoretical and methodological problems of assessing the readiness of socioeconomic systems for changes. The theories of factors that are the mainstay of this study are the interesting section in this study. To complete the study of changes in complex socio-economic systems, along with the approaches of evolutionary universalism, a set of scientific methods was applied, namely: structural-functional analysis, comparative-typological analysis, historical method, methods of induction and deduction. The aim of the article. The main purpose of the study is to develop further theoretical and methodological approaches to scientific substantiation of changes in socio-economic systems in different concepts of evolutionary economics. Methodology. The methodological and theoretical foundations of the research are the theories of factors that are the mainstay of this study. To complete the study of changes in complex socio-economic systems, along with the approaches of evolutionary universalism, a set of scientific methods was applied, namely: structural-functional analysis, comparative-typological analysis, historical method, methods of induction and deduction. Value/ originality. In particular, we defined methodological requirements for the evaluation process and systematized the formalized methods of different levels of socio-economic systems assessment implementation complexity. We proved scientifically that the trajectory of system movement is determined by achievement a critical point that changes the quality of socio-economic system. At the same time, the value capitalization of the enterprise should be ensured concerning consumers and other stakeholders, participants of the enterprise activity. The levels of socio-economic system readiness for changes are highlighted.

How to Cite

Mazaraki, A., Drozdova, Y., & Bay, S. (2020). THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES FOR ASSESSMENT THE READINESS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS FOR CHANGES. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(1), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-80-86
Article views: 494 | PDF Downloads: 387

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

socio-economic systems, enterprise, evaluation process, changes

References

Bessonov, V. A. (2000). About transformational structural shifts of Russian industrial production. Economic journal HSE, 4(2), 184–219.

Bilotserkіvets, V. V., & Zavgorodnya, O. O. (2009). The evolution of the methodological foundations of the study of the new economy: from stochastic perception to the algorithmization of cognition. Economic Bulletin of NSU, 4, 6–13.

Borisov, A. N. (1989). Fuzzy information processing in decision making systems. Moskow: Radio and communications.

Bukanov, H., Kolesnyk, A., Tashkinova, O., Kotlubai, V., & Koval, V. (2019). Social marketing in public administration of social service institutions. Revista Genero & Direito, 8(6), 457–468.

Dosi, J., & Winter, S. (2003). Interpretation of economic change: evolution, structures and games. 5th Intern. Symposium on Evolutionary Economics. Pushchino.

Eliseeva, I. I., & Dmitriev, A. L (2003). Meetings with Nobel Laureates in Economics J. Heckman and L. Klein. Questions of statistics, 3, 135–148.

Gontareva, I. (1975). Mathematics and cybernetics in economics: a dictionary. Moskow: Economics. Hurwicz, L. (1996). Institutions as families of game forms. The Japanese Economic review, 47(1), 89–96.

Izmalkov, S., Sonin, K., & Yudkevich, M. (2008). Theory of economic mechanisms (Nobel Prize in Economics in 2007). Problems of Economics, 1, 148–157.

Kleiner, G. (2002). Systemic paradigm and enterprise theory. Issues of Economics, 10, 47–69.

Kleiner, G. (2003). From enterprise theory to the theory of strategic management. Russian journal management, 1, 31–56.

Koval, V., Duginets, G., Plekhanova, O., Antonov, A., & Petrova, M. (2019). On the supranational and national level of global value chain management. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 1922–1937. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(27)

Koval, V., Slobodianiuk, O., & Yankovyi, V. (2018). Production forecasting and evaluation of investments using Allen two-factor production function. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 219–226. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-219-226

Nazarova, K., Hordopolov, V., Kopotiienko, T., Miniailo, V., Koval, V., & Diachenko, Y. (2019). Audit in the state economic security system. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 41(3), 419–430.

Prigogin, A.I. (2007). Disorganization: causes, types, overcoming. Moskow: Alpina Business Books.

Rakhaev, B. M. (2006). Regular Chances of Economic Growth. Economic Bulletin of Rostov State University, 1(4), 156–167.

Rakhaev, B. M., Karchaeva, B. M., Kudalieva, L. M., & Tramova, M. Sh. (2006). Regular Chances of Economic Growth. Economic Bulletin of Rostov State University, 1(4), 106–115.

Reut, D. V. (2003). The discourse of creativity and cognitive parallax. Moscow: Institute of Management Problems RAS.

Ruegg-Sturm, J. (1998). New system theory and internal changes. Problems of theory and practice of management, 5, 106–111.

Ruley, E. (1998). Politics of the enterprise. Problems of theory and practice of management, 4, 99–103.

Shumska, S. S. (2007). Production function in economic analysis: theory and practice of use. Economy and forecasting, 2, 138–153.

Sukharev, O. (2002). The concept of economic dysfunction and the evolution of the company. Problems of Economics, 10, 70–81.

Tereshchenko, A. N. (2008). Evaluation of the organizational and economic mechanism of the efficiency of agricultural enterprises. Economics and mathematical methods, 1, 132–143.

Issue
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Baltic Journal of Economic Studies