AGRICULTURAL COOPERATION: EXPERIENCE OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES FOR UKRAINE

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Mar 16, 2020

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the experience of agricultural cooperation in foreign countries, such as Sweden, Norway, Finland, Japan and apply it in Ukraine. The defining feature is that the existing agricultural cooperation in Ukraine is not backed up by proper legislation to integrate with the European countries. Analyzing the state of agricultural cooperation in Ukraine in comparison with foreign countries, the country remains a number of unresolved issues regarding its normal functioning, namely: the activation of international economic cooperation of Ukraine involving the development of a strategy for the effective functioning of agricultural cooperation, which is the basis for ensuring the various areas of rural development employment of rural population. In addition, agricultural cooperation stimulates the development of agrarian market infrastructure, plays an exceptional role in strengthening the economic potential, competitiveness and social status of agricultural producers, improving economic conditions and creating incentives for the growth of commodity products. However, so far its development is at a low level, the main reasons being the underestimation in the process of economic reforms of cooperative forms of economic activity, general unfavorable conditions for agricultural production, psychological unwillingness of peasants to cooperate and insufficient knowledge of the rural population about the benefits of cooperation, weak state support for small businesses in agribusiness and agricultural cooperatives. Methods. The countries of the West in every way stimulate the development of cooperation: by appropriate laws, privileges, subsidies. Ukraine needs to take the example from these countries in order to develop the cooperative movement, which will stimulate rural development. Results. Ukraine is trying to build on the experience of different countries in the field of agricultural cooperation, backing up on the best of the countries studied. Practical implications. Studies have shown that world experience convinces that cooperation has contributed to the development of many countries in the world. In Europe, for example, cooperatives are an important part of economic life and industry. Value/originality. Analyzing the activities of agricultural cooperatives operating in the world, we point out that the main advantage of combining agricultural producers in cooperatives is a grower group (union or cooperative) is considered as the only powerful organization that is able to buy large volumes of products and services and realize large volumes of production.

How to Cite

Sakovska, O. (2020). AGRICULTURAL COOPERATION: EXPERIENCE OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES FOR UKRAINE. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(1), 118-124. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-118-124
Article views: 658 | PDF Downloads: 433

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Sweden, Norway, Finland, Japan, agricultural cooperation, foreign experience, legislation, Ukraine

References

Aleskerova, Yu. V. (2009). Kredituvannya regіonal'nogo APK [Lending to regional agribusiness]. Zbіrnyk naukovih prac, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 645–648. Kamianets-Podilskyi.

Aleskerova, Yu., Mulyk, T., & Fedoryshyna, L. (2018). Improving credit protection analysis methods Reports of main agricultural enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-2-1-7

Aleskerova, Yu., Fedoryshyna, L., & Koval, N. (2018). Features of loan security for the reproduction of fixed assets for agricultural purposes. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-4-1-5

Aleskerova, Yu., & Todosiychuk, V. (2016). Fiscal multipliers in Ukraine. Economy and management organization, vol. 4(24), pp. 36–43.

Rogach, S., Vdovenko, L., & Polishchuk, O. (2019). Agriculture of Ukraine under the joint policy of the European Union. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 178–183. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-178-183

Plakhtii, T., Fedoryshyna, L., & Tomchuk, O. (2019). Socio-economic component of preferential taxation of individuals' incomes. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 171–175. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-2-171-175

Polova, O., & Ruda, O. (2019). Modern Technologies in Economy and Management. Collective Scientific Monograph: The Academy of Administration in Opole.

Todosiichuk, V. L. (2018). Kontseptualni zasady upravlinnia finansovymy resursamy derzhavnoho pidpryiemstva [Conceptual principles of financial resources management of a state-owned enterprise]. Infrastruktura rynku, vol. 26, pp. 56–64.

Kohn, Alfie (1992). No Contest: The Case Against Competition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 978-0-395-63125-6

Fehr, Ernst. "Altruistic punishment in humans" (PDF). Macmillan Magazines Ltd. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 September 2011. Retrieved 20 July 2011.

Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 7, pp. 1–16.

Frans de Waal (2016). Are We Smart Enough To Know How Smart Animals Are? ISBN 978-1-78378-305-2

Clutton-Brock, T. (2002). Breeding together: Kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science, vol. 296(5565), pp. 69–72. doi:10.1126/science.296.5565.69

Lindenfors, Patrik (2017). For Whose Benefit? The Biological and Cultural Evolution of Human Cooperation. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-50873-3

Sakovska, O., & Shpykuliak, O. (2019). State regulation of the functioning and development of agricultural cooperatives in the grain market. Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management

Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020. 33rd IBIMA Conference: 10–11 April 2019 Granada, Spain. Editor Khalid S. Soliman.

Yablochnikov, S., Kuptsov, M., Omelchenko, O., Gupta, S. K., Reznik, N., Hatsko, A., & Sakovska, O. (2019). Modelling of informational counteraction between objects in economy. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, vol. 8, issue 6, pp. 3797–3802.

Yevdokimova, М., Zamlynskyi, V., Kuznietsov, E., Sakovska, О., & Hatsko, A. (2018). Evolution of social responsibility applied to the concept of sustainable development: mainstream of the 20th century. Journal of security and sustainability issues, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–78.

Clutton-Brock, T. (2002). Breeding together: Kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science, vol. 296(5565), pp. 69–72. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5565.69