Yaroslav Kvach

  Nataliia Piatka

  Viktor Koval


The article highlights the problem of management of sustainable entrepreneurship adaptation to tax changes in environmental investment and substantiation of the conceptual basis for assessing the efficiency of environmental investment in terms of Ukraine’s integration processes into European community that involves introduction of sustainable economic development and mechanisms of “green” economy. Methods. A study of the peculiarities of environmental financing in Ukraine has been conducted. The theoretical bases of investment management have been examined by means of the following methods: semantic analysis of interaction of the basic elements of environmental investment process for sustainable entrepreneurship development. With the use of a comparative analysis of environmental investment, efficiency and effectiveness of environmental tax collection in Ukraine and the EU countries, the expedience of using environmental taxation as a means of stimulating domestic environmental investment has been substantiated and the need to assess the efficiency of environmental investment has been defined. Results. A study of the peculiarities of domestic environmental taxation in order to establish its efficiency has been carried out. The experience of using taxes as a means of stimulating environmental investment in the EU countries has been under consideration. This research has shown that the efficiency of environmental taxes is ensured by their high rates, which encourage companies to innovate and make appropriate environmental investments. A number of shortcomings in the domestic environmental policy have been identified. It has proven the low efficiency of its instruments, in particular, related to assessing the efficiency of environmental investment. A study of the peculiarities of environmental financing in Ukraine has been conducted. The current tendencies of investment in environmental activities with the identification of causal relationships to substantiate management decisions to improve the use of financial resources for environmental purposes have been highlighted.

How to Cite

Article views: 39 | PDF Downloads: 22



sustainable entrepreneurship, taxes, taxation, assessing efficiency, adaptation to tax changes, environmental investment


Bostian, M., Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lundgren, T. (2016). Environmental investment and firm performance: A network approach. Energy Economics, 57, 243–255.

Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of business venturing, 22(1), 29–49.

Drahan, I. O. (2011). Analysis of foreign experience of investment and innovation support of state environmental policy. Naukovyi visnyk akademii munitsypalnoho upravlinnia, 2, 50–60. (in Ukrainian)

Eurostat (2018). General and regional statistics. Available at:

Fullerton, Don & Kim, Seung-Rae. (2006). Environmental investment and policy with distortionary taxes, and endogenous growth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 56. 141–154. doi:

Gubanova E., Kupinets L., Deforzh H., Koval V., Gaska K. (2019). Recycling of polymer waste in the context of developing circular economy. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, 12(4), 99–108. doі:

Hassan, M., Oueslati, W., & Rousselière, D. (2020). Environmental taxes, reforms and economic growth: An empirical analysis of panel data. Economic Systems, 44(3), 100806.

Higgins, A. J., Hajkowicz, S., & Bui, E. (2008). A multi-objective model for environmental investment decision making. Computers & operations research, 35(1), 253–266.

Klassen, R. D., & Vachon, S. (2003). Collaboration and evaluation in the supply chain: The impact on plant level environmental investment. Production and operations Management, 12(3), 336–352.

Kostetska, K., Khumarova, N., Umanska, Y., Shmygol, N., & Koval, V. (2020). Institutional qualities of inclusive environmental management in sustainable economic development. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 28 (2), 15–22. doi:

Mahmood, H., Furqan, M., & Bagais, O. A. (2019). Environmental accounting of financial development and foreign investment: spatial analyses of East Asia. Sustainability, 11(1), 13.

Nazarova, K., Hordopolov, V., Kopotiienko, T., Miniailo, V., Koval, V., & Diachenko, Y. (2019). Audit in the state economic security system. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 41(3), 419–430.

OECD/EEA (2019). Database on instruments used for environmental policy and natural resources management. Available at:

Piatka, N.S., Kovshun, N.E. (2019). Environmental taxation as a tool for financing environmental measures. Modern trends in the development of financial and credit system: theory and practice. Poltava: PP “Astraya”.

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Business strategy and the environment, 20(4), 222–237.

State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2019). Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2018. Available at:

Stubbs, W. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship and B corps. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 331–344.

Testa, F., Gusmerottia, N. M., Corsini, F., Passetti, E., & Iraldo, F. (2016). Factors affecting environmental management by small and micro firms: The importance of entrepreneurs’ attitudes and environmental investment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 373–385.

Weidinger, C. (2014). Sustainable Entrepreneurship Business Success through Sustainability. Springer.

Yankovyi, O., Koval, V., Trokhymets, O., Karpenko, M., & Matskevich, Y. (2020). Economic assessment of investment on the basis of production functions. Turismo: Estudos &Práticas.

Zhao, Y., Zhou, J., & Kuang, H. (2019). Environmental tax on directed technological innovation in a green growth model. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 18(9), 2045–2054.