PSYCHOLINGUISTIC MANIPULATION OF TEXT MESSAGES

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Apr 22, 2022

Abstract

In the provisions of the scientific article the author considers the concept of psycholinguistic manipulative influence, means and methods of exercising such influence; identifies and analyzes the features of the use of various language tools and constructions to achieve communicative goals; clarifies the psycholinguistic essence of the phenomenon of manipulation. The author considers strategies of psycholinguistic manipulation of texts that carry the risks of indoctrination, active suggestion in various ways of certain ideological views, which through individual psychological effects can undermine local or general social stability. The specifics of psycholinguistic manipulation on the psyche of the individual are analyzed, the main mechanisms of such influence are defined and characterized, the main psychological features on which the manipulation is based are established. The approaches presented in the article allow to identify sources of psycholinguistic manipulation of the addressee's consciousness and to establish psychological factors of the dominant semantics of the text in order to organize measures to preserve and control information and psychological security of the individual.

How to Cite

Shereshkova, I. (2022). PSYCHOLINGUISTIC MANIPULATION OF TEXT MESSAGES. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (3), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2021-3-20
Article views: 131 | PDF Downloads: 133

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

linguistic influence, text, tokens, linguistic distortions

References
1. Andrushchak O., Zapolovskyi M. (2021). Movni zasoby vyrazhennia implikatur u suchasnii anhlomovnii publitsystytsi (Linguistic means of expression of implicatures in modern English-language journalism). Problemy humanitarnykh nauk: zbirnyk naukovykh prats Drohobytskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Seriia «Filolohiia», 45, P. 19–29. doi: 10.24919/2522-4565.2021.45.2 [in Ukrainian].
2. Bart R. (1994). Voina yazykov (War of tongues). Yzbrannye raboty: Semyotyka: Pojetyka. – M., 101 p. [in Russian].
3. Bulyhyna T. V., Shmeljev A. D. (1997). Yazykovaia kontseptualyzatsyia myra: (na materyale russkoi hrammatyky) (Language conceptualization of the world: (based on Russian grammar) / T. V. Bulyhyna, A. D. Shmeljev. – M.: Shkola «Iazyky russkoi kultury», 576 p. [in Russian].
4. Herasina L. M., Pohribna V. L., Polishchuk I. O. ta in. (2015). Viina «hibrydna» (Hybrid War) / Politolohichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk / Za red. M. P. Trebina. Kharkiv : Pravo, 816 p. [in Ukrainian].
5. Horbulin V.P. (2014). «Hibrydna viina» yak kliuchovyi instrument rosiiskoi heostratehii revanshu («Hybrid war2 as a key tool in Russiaʼs geostrategy of revenge)/ Stratehichni priorytety. № 4 (33). P. 5-12 [in Ukrainian].
6. Hrachev H. V., Melnyk Y. K. (2003). Manypulyrovanye lychnostiu (Personality manipulation) – M.: Yzdatelstvo «Jeksmo», 184 p. [in Russian].
7. Dotsenko E. L. (1997). Psykholohyia manypuliatsyy: fenomeny, mekhanyzmy y zashchyta (Psychology of manipulation: phenomena, mechanisms and protection). Moskva: CheRo, Yzdatelstvo MHU. 344 p. [in Russian].
8. Kalmykova L.O. (2008). Psykholohiia movlennia i psykholinhvistyka (Speech psychology and psycholinguistics): navchalnyi posibnyk dlia studentiv vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv / Kalmykova L.O., Kalmykov H.V., Lapshyna I.M., Kharchenko N.V.; Za zah. red. L.O. Kalmykovoi. – K.: Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi pedahohichnyi instytut, v-vo “Feniks”. 245 p. [in Ukrainian].
9. Kara-Murza S. H. (2000). Manypuliatsyia soznanyem (Mind manipulation). M.: Alhorytm. 423 p. [in Russian].
10. Konverskyi A. Ye. (2008). Lohika (tradytsiina ta suchasna) (Logic (traditional and modern). Pidruchnyk dlia studentiv vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv. K.: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury. 536 p. [in Ukrainian].
11. Kopnina H.A. (2012). Rechevoe manypulyrovanye (Speech manipulation): ucheb.posobye. Moskva: Flynta. 170 p. [in Russian].
12. Lemesh V. H. (2011) Zasoby manipuliatyvnoho vplyvu u smyslovomu prostori anhlomovnoho media tekstu (Means of manipulative influence in the semantic space of English-language media text) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhym dostupu: http://www.confcontact.com/20110929/iy_lemesh.p [in Ukrainian].
13. Naumkina S., Diachenko O. (2017) Vykorystannia movno-manipuliatyvnykh tekhnolohii na riznykh etapakh politychnoho konfliktu (Use of manipulative language technologies at different stages of political conflict). Visnyk Donetskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Vasylia Stusa. Seriia: Politychni nauky, P. 55-59 [in Ukrainian].
14. Pavliuk L. (2006). Znak, symvol, mif u masovii komunikatsii (Sign, symbol, myth in mass communication). Lviv: PAIS. 120 p. [in Ukrainian].
15. Podshyvailova H. M. (2009). Movni zasoby manipuliatyvnoho vplyvu v politychnomu dyskursi (na materiali drukovanykh rosiiskomovnykh ZMI Ukrainy) (Linguistic means of manipulative influence in political discourse (based on the material of the Russian-language print media of Ukraine): avtoref. dys. kand. filol. nauk / H. M. Podshyvailova ; Kyiv. nats. linhv . un-t. – K. 21 p. [in Ukrainian].
16. Pocheptsov H. (2014) Rosiia i Ukraina u spivstavlenni yikh komunikatyvno-propahandystskykh mozhlyvostei (Russia and Ukraine in comparing their communication and advocacy capabilities). [Elektronnyi resurs] / H. Pocheptsov. – Rezhym dostupu : http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/ material/33291 [in Ukrainian].
17. Rizun V. V. (2005). Linhvistyka vplyvu (Linguistics of influence): monohrafiia / V. V. Rizun, N. F. Nepyivoda, V. M. Kornieiev. – K. : Vydavnycho-polihrafichnyi tsentr „Kyivskyi universytet”. 148 p. [in Ukrainian].
18. Rohushyna Yu.V. (2015). Ontolohichnyi analiz u Web (Ontological analysis in the Web): monohrafiia / Yu.V. Rohushyna, A.Ia. Hladun, V.V. Osadchyi, S.M. Pryima. — Melitopol: MDPU im. Bohdana Khmelnytskoho. 407 p. [in Ukrainian].
19. Sannykov V. Z. (2002). Russkyi yazyk v zerkale yazykovoi yhry(Russian language in the mirror of the language game). M. : Yazyky slavianskoi kultury. 539 p. [in Russian].
20. Selivanova O.O. (2008). Suchasna linhvistyka: napriamy ta problemy (Modern linguistics: directions and problems): pidruchnyk/ O.O. Selivanova. – Poltava: Dovkillia-K, 712 p. [in Ukrainian].
21. Smyrnytskyi A.Y. (1957). Syntaksys anhlyiskoho yazyka (English syntax.). M.: Yzdatelstvo lyteratury na ynostrannykh yazykakh, 284 p. [in Russian].
22. Sorokyn Yu. A., Tarasov E. F. (1990). Kreolyzovannye teksty y ykh kommunykatyvnaia funktsyia (Creolized texts and their communicative function) / Yu. A. Sorokyn, E. F. Tarasov // Optymyzatsyia rechevoho vozdeistvyia, – M. : Nauka. 240 p. [in Russian].
23. Tarasov E.F. (1990). Rechevoe vozdeistvye kak problema rechevoho obshchenyia (Speech impact as a problem of speech communication.). Moskva: Nauka. P. 3-14 [in Russian].
24. Khairulin O.M. (2021). Informatsiino-psykholohichna bezpeka osobystosti v konteksti movnoi hry (Information and psychological security of the individual in the context of language play). Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NAOU №1. P. 189–208 [in Ukrainian].
25. Entsyklopedyia metodov propahandy (Encyclopedia of propaganda methods) [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://psyfactor.org/propaganda.htm [in Russian].
26. Grice H.P. (1991). Logic and Conversation. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge (Mass.), L. : Harvard Univ. Press, 1991. P. 26–27.
27. Nye J. S. (1991). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power / Joseph S. Nye [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://isites.harvard. edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1404291. files/E-1/Nye-SoftPower.pdf