NATIONAL AND SUPERNATIONAL IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STUDY OF POLITICAL IDENTITY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published:
Oct 25, 2022
Abstract
The article reveals the concepts of «national» and «supernational» identity, according to various authors, in particular, G. Kelman, B. Parekhu, J. Brayley, W. Kimlik, P. Gilroy. Types and attributes of national identity are studied. The article considers the problem of building a supranational political identity. The example of the EU reveals the question of the relationship between national and supranational. Particular attention is paid to how attempts to build a supranational political identity are mediated in the mass consciousness. It is emphasized that the main problem is that European political issues are far from the everyday life of citizens, and therefore European political institutions are not built into the system of actors who are addressed by the demands and expectations of citizens and which, in turn, can affect everyday life agenda.
How to Cite
Isaieva, N. (2022). NATIONAL AND SUPERNATIONAL IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STUDY OF POLITICAL IDENTITY. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (2), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2022-2-14
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
national identity, supranational identity, European Union, political identity, culture, nationalism.
References
1. Chirkov N.V. (2021). Znachenie inkulturatcii khristianstva dlia missionerskoi deiatelnosti RKTc, raskrytoe v poslaniiakh rimskikh pontifikov poslesobornogo perioda. [The significance of the inculturation of Christianity for the missionary activity of the RCC, revealed in the messages of the Roman pontiffs of the post-conciliar period]. Religiovedenie. 24‒33. [in Russian].
2. Entsyklika Apostoli Slavorum, sv. Ivana-Pavla II, Papy Rymskoho. (1985). Retrieved from: http://katekhytyka-6.blogspot. com/2018/01/apostoli-slavorum-1985.html. [in Ukrainian].
3. Entsyklika Redemptoris Missio – «Misiia Vidkupytelia» – Sv. Ivana Pavla II. (1990). Retrieved from: http://dds.edu.ua/ua/articles/2/ duhovna-svitlytsa/rik-viry-2012-2013/1115-fides-et-ratio.html [in Ukrainian].
4. Horokholinska I.H. (2019). Demarkatsiia sekuliarnoho postsekuliarnoho v suchasnii relihiinosti: filosofskyi ta bohoslovskyi dyskurs [Demarcation of the Secular Post-Secular in Contemporary Religion: Philosophical and Theological Discourse] [in Ukrainian].
5. Hrom V. (2012). Rol inkulturatsii u misiinii diialnosti Katolytskoi Tserkvy ad gentes na osnovi vybranykh tvoriv blazhennoho Ivana Pavla ІІ. [The role of inculturation in missionary activities of the Catholic Church Ad Gentes on the basis selected works of blessed Ivan Paul]. 87. [in Ukrainian].
6. Hvozdetskyi Ya. (2010). Dukhovno-relihiini ta filosofski peredumovy suchasnoho ukrainskoho ekumenizmu. [Spiritual, religious and philosophical prerequisites of modern Ukrainian ecumenism]. Relihiia ta sotsium. № 2. 156‒160. [in Ukrainian].
7. Iarotskyi P. (2002). Ekumenizm: stan, problemy suchasnoho rozvytku. [Ecumenism: state, problems of modern development.]. Relihiina svoboda: svoboda relihii i natsionalna identychnist – svitovyi dosvid ta ukrainski problemy. Kyiv. 37‒41. [in Ukrainian].
8. Katkyn D.V. (2016). Poniatie «ekumenizm». Predposylki vozniknoveniia ekumenizma. Evangelie v kontekste sovremennoi kultury». [The concept of “ecumenism”. Prerequisites for the emergence of ecumenism]. Evanhelye v kontekste sovremennoi kultury. 270‒273. [in Russian].
9. Khong, N. N. (2016). Evoliutciia katolitcizma vo Vetname posle Vtorogo Vatikanskogo sobora. [Evoliutciia katolitcizma vo Vetname after Vtorogo Vatikanskogo sobora]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiia i konfliktologiia, (4), 127-134. [in Russian].
10. Klymov V. (2010). Tolerantnist mizhkonfesiinykh vidnosyn yak kultura novoho tysiacholittia. [Tolerance of interfaith relations as a culture of the new millennium]. Relihiina panorama. 1. 29-33. [in Ukrainian].
11. Korniichuk Yu.Iu. (2011). Sotsialnyi vymir ekumenichnoi diialnosti pravoslavnykh tserkov. [The social dimension of the ecumenical activity of the Orthodox churches] Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
12. Kyiak S. (2015). Khrystyianskyi ekumenizm: katolytska paradyhma ta yii perspektyvy. [Christian ecumenism: the Catholic paradigm and its perspectives]. Relihiia i sotsium. 3. 66‒74. [in Ukrainian].
13. Mordvintceva L. P. (2000). Dobbelere K. Dvusmyslennost otnosheniia religii k globalnomu obshchestvu. [Dobbelere K. The ambiguity of the relationship of religions to the global society]. Religiia i kultura, 74-77. [in Russian].
14. Nykonov K.Y. (2013). Filosofsko-antropologicheskie aspekty mezhreligioznogo dialoga. [Philosophical and anthropological aspects of interreligious dialogue]. Evraziia: dukhovnye traditcii narodov. 1(2). 243‒252. [in Russian].
15. Ovsienko F.G. (2006). Katolicheskaia kontceptciia dialoga zapadno-khristianskoi i vostochno-khristianskoi tcivilizatcii. [The Catholic concept of the dialogue between Western Christian and Eastern Christian civilizations]. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tcerkov v Rossii i za rubezhom. 1(2). 70‒82. [in Russian].
16. Seredinin Ch.D. (2016). Metodologiia missii katolicheskoi tcerkvi v XX veke. Evangelie v kontekste sovremennoi kultury. [Methodology of the mission of the Catholic Church in the XX century]. 2016. 90‒97. [in Russian].
17. Shavrova O.G.(2012). Ekumenicheskoe dvizhenie i mezhkonfessionalnyi dialog v globaliziruiushchemsia mire. [Ecumenical Movement and Interfaith Dialogue in a Globalizing World]. Sbornik materialov konferentcii Dialog tcivilizatcii. 125‒129. [in Russian].
18. Shkribliak M. (2013). Pravoslavno-katolytskyi dialoh epokhy rannoho modernu: natsionalno-relihiinyi kontekst. [Orthodox-Catholic dialogue of the early modern era: national-religious context]. Mandrivets. 4. 22–26. [in Ukrainian].
19. Sidakova, M. O. (2020). Problematizatciia znacheniia poniatiia «sinkretizm» i ego sinonimy. [Problematization of the meaning of the concept of "syncretism" and its synonyms]. Religiovedenie, (2), 42. [in Russian].
20. Verhun A. M., Tarasenko I. O. (2014). Kontseptsiia staloho rozvytku v umovakh hlobalizatsii. [Concept of sustainable development in conditions of globalization]. Visnyk KNUTD. № 2. 207‒218. [in Ukrainian].
2. Entsyklika Apostoli Slavorum, sv. Ivana-Pavla II, Papy Rymskoho. (1985). Retrieved from: http://katekhytyka-6.blogspot. com/2018/01/apostoli-slavorum-1985.html. [in Ukrainian].
3. Entsyklika Redemptoris Missio – «Misiia Vidkupytelia» – Sv. Ivana Pavla II. (1990). Retrieved from: http://dds.edu.ua/ua/articles/2/ duhovna-svitlytsa/rik-viry-2012-2013/1115-fides-et-ratio.html [in Ukrainian].
4. Horokholinska I.H. (2019). Demarkatsiia sekuliarnoho postsekuliarnoho v suchasnii relihiinosti: filosofskyi ta bohoslovskyi dyskurs [Demarcation of the Secular Post-Secular in Contemporary Religion: Philosophical and Theological Discourse] [in Ukrainian].
5. Hrom V. (2012). Rol inkulturatsii u misiinii diialnosti Katolytskoi Tserkvy ad gentes na osnovi vybranykh tvoriv blazhennoho Ivana Pavla ІІ. [The role of inculturation in missionary activities of the Catholic Church Ad Gentes on the basis selected works of blessed Ivan Paul]. 87. [in Ukrainian].
6. Hvozdetskyi Ya. (2010). Dukhovno-relihiini ta filosofski peredumovy suchasnoho ukrainskoho ekumenizmu. [Spiritual, religious and philosophical prerequisites of modern Ukrainian ecumenism]. Relihiia ta sotsium. № 2. 156‒160. [in Ukrainian].
7. Iarotskyi P. (2002). Ekumenizm: stan, problemy suchasnoho rozvytku. [Ecumenism: state, problems of modern development.]. Relihiina svoboda: svoboda relihii i natsionalna identychnist – svitovyi dosvid ta ukrainski problemy. Kyiv. 37‒41. [in Ukrainian].
8. Katkyn D.V. (2016). Poniatie «ekumenizm». Predposylki vozniknoveniia ekumenizma. Evangelie v kontekste sovremennoi kultury». [The concept of “ecumenism”. Prerequisites for the emergence of ecumenism]. Evanhelye v kontekste sovremennoi kultury. 270‒273. [in Russian].
9. Khong, N. N. (2016). Evoliutciia katolitcizma vo Vetname posle Vtorogo Vatikanskogo sobora. [Evoliutciia katolitcizma vo Vetname after Vtorogo Vatikanskogo sobora]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiia i konfliktologiia, (4), 127-134. [in Russian].
10. Klymov V. (2010). Tolerantnist mizhkonfesiinykh vidnosyn yak kultura novoho tysiacholittia. [Tolerance of interfaith relations as a culture of the new millennium]. Relihiina panorama. 1. 29-33. [in Ukrainian].
11. Korniichuk Yu.Iu. (2011). Sotsialnyi vymir ekumenichnoi diialnosti pravoslavnykh tserkov. [The social dimension of the ecumenical activity of the Orthodox churches] Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
12. Kyiak S. (2015). Khrystyianskyi ekumenizm: katolytska paradyhma ta yii perspektyvy. [Christian ecumenism: the Catholic paradigm and its perspectives]. Relihiia i sotsium. 3. 66‒74. [in Ukrainian].
13. Mordvintceva L. P. (2000). Dobbelere K. Dvusmyslennost otnosheniia religii k globalnomu obshchestvu. [Dobbelere K. The ambiguity of the relationship of religions to the global society]. Religiia i kultura, 74-77. [in Russian].
14. Nykonov K.Y. (2013). Filosofsko-antropologicheskie aspekty mezhreligioznogo dialoga. [Philosophical and anthropological aspects of interreligious dialogue]. Evraziia: dukhovnye traditcii narodov. 1(2). 243‒252. [in Russian].
15. Ovsienko F.G. (2006). Katolicheskaia kontceptciia dialoga zapadno-khristianskoi i vostochno-khristianskoi tcivilizatcii. [The Catholic concept of the dialogue between Western Christian and Eastern Christian civilizations]. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tcerkov v Rossii i za rubezhom. 1(2). 70‒82. [in Russian].
16. Seredinin Ch.D. (2016). Metodologiia missii katolicheskoi tcerkvi v XX veke. Evangelie v kontekste sovremennoi kultury. [Methodology of the mission of the Catholic Church in the XX century]. 2016. 90‒97. [in Russian].
17. Shavrova O.G.(2012). Ekumenicheskoe dvizhenie i mezhkonfessionalnyi dialog v globaliziruiushchemsia mire. [Ecumenical Movement and Interfaith Dialogue in a Globalizing World]. Sbornik materialov konferentcii Dialog tcivilizatcii. 125‒129. [in Russian].
18. Shkribliak M. (2013). Pravoslavno-katolytskyi dialoh epokhy rannoho modernu: natsionalno-relihiinyi kontekst. [Orthodox-Catholic dialogue of the early modern era: national-religious context]. Mandrivets. 4. 22–26. [in Ukrainian].
19. Sidakova, M. O. (2020). Problematizatciia znacheniia poniatiia «sinkretizm» i ego sinonimy. [Problematization of the meaning of the concept of "syncretism" and its synonyms]. Religiovedenie, (2), 42. [in Russian].
20. Verhun A. M., Tarasenko I. O. (2014). Kontseptsiia staloho rozvytku v umovakh hlobalizatsii. [Concept of sustainable development in conditions of globalization]. Visnyk KNUTD. № 2. 207‒218. [in Ukrainian].