LINGUISTIC RECONSTRUCTION OF NOMADIC IDENTITY IN LITERARY DISCOURSE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article explores the linguistic and stylistic representation of nomadic identity in literary discourse. The analysis is based on the works of Ukrainian and international authors that reflect a specific vision of space, movement, and self-identification. The methodology combines linguistic stylistic analysis with a discourse-based approach and elements of cognitive linguistics. Key linguistic means that convey the experience of loss, transition, and interaction with the “Other” are identified. It is established that literary text not only reflects historical memory but also actively constructs it, forming flexible models of identity. The findings may be applied in further interdisciplinary research in the fields of culture, language, and literature within the frameworks of postmemory, transculturality, and mobile subjectivity.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
nomadic archetype, linguistic identity, literary discourse, linguistic stylistics, space in text, memory and language, mobility, discursive construction
2. Shevchuk, V. (2001). Dim na hori. Kyiv: Lybid. [Chapter “The House”, pp. 45–66].
3. Andrukhovych, Y. (2003). Moscoviada. Kyiv: A-BA-BA-HA-LA-MA-HA. [pp. 71–89].
4. Hirsch, M. (2012). The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust. Columbia University Press. [pp. 5–27].
5. Hall, S. (1996). Cultural identity and diaspora. In Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory (pp. 392–401). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
6. Assmann, A. (2010). Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge University Press. [pp. 91–118].
7. Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, History, Forgetting. University of Chicago Press. [pp. 57–85].
8. Clifford, J. (1997). Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Harvard University Press. [pp. 1–40].
9. Pamuk, O. (2005). Istanbul: Memories and the City. Knopf. [pp. 132–158].
10. Roy, A. (2019). The God of Small Things. Kyiv: Tempora. [pp. 173–191].
11. Hundorova, T. (2005). Pisliachornobylska biblioteka. Kyiv: Krytyka. [pp. 203–215].
12. Zborovska, N. (2005). Feminna viziia: Literary Studies. Kyiv: Fakt. [pp. 59–74].
13. Haleta, O. (2007). Slovo i svit: Narrative Models of Contemporary Ukrainian Prose. Lviv: Lytopys. [pp. 128–142].
14. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press. [pp. 17–38].