EQUITY MARKETS RISKS AND RETURNS: IMPLICATIONS FOR GLOBAL PORTFOLIO CAPITAL FLOWS DURING PANDEMIC AND CRISIS PERIODS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Pavlo Dziuba

  Olena Pryiatelchuk

  Denys Rusak

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the study of risk and return tradeoff in the global equity market as well as particular market groups: developed, emerging and frontier markets. Impact of this tradeoff on international equity portfolio liabilities is explored. The study confirms the hypothesis that there are some specific patterns of risk and return tradeoff during crisis periods and periods of markets regular regime that substantially differ from each other and define global portfolio equity flows and liabilities in a specific way. The paper thus carries out its main objective that implies revealing these patterns with respective qualitative features and quantitative markers, specifying their implications for equity portfolio flows to markets of different types. Risks and returns for different market groups and global market as a whole are calculated for the period between 2002 and 2020 using standard methodology of contemporary portfolio theory and MSCI indices monthly values. The data for international equity portfolio liabilities as well as the share of particular market group in the global market are used as dependent variables. The latter are regressed by calculated risks and returns. Using the model results and some analytical developments, two patterns of risk/return tradeoff are discovered. The pattern attributable to regular market regimes is characterized by positive returns which is 1.51 % in average for the global market, 1.48 % for developed markets and 2.03 % for emerging markets. Risks in regular pattern are relatively small or moderate at the average level of 3.05 for the global market and are all below the median (3.48). Respective risks for developed and emerging markets are 3.02 and 4.54. The Sharpe ratios in regular pattern are positive at the average level of 0.60 for the global market, 0.57 and 0.45 for developed and emerging market groups respectively. The crisis pattern implies negative returns at the mean of -1.04 for the global market, -0.97 for the developed group and -1.35 for the emerging markets. High risks are all above the median and in average compile 5.5 for the global market, 5.47 for the developed markets and 6.68 for the emerging group. Sharpe ratios for this pattern are negative being equal to -0.19 in the mean. The average value is -0.18 for developed markets and it is -0.24 for emerging markets. Specific pattern of 2020 crisis should be settled out. Its main feature that substantially distinguishes it from other crises is the combination of highest risk level and the positive returns at the same time. Elaborated regression model confirms the direct impact of return and indirect impact of risk on global portfolio liabilities. The influence of risk for regular and crisis patterns does not differ substantially while the impact of return is much stronger during periods of increased volatility (respective model parameters are 3793.76 and 447.24). However, the discovered impact is much more reliable in crisis pattern that is supported by much higher determination ratio. Developed markets experience similar effects.

How to Cite

Dziuba, P., Pryiatelchuk, O., & Rusak, D. (2021). EQUITY MARKETS RISKS AND RETURNS: IMPLICATIONS FOR GLOBAL PORTFOLIO CAPITAL FLOWS DURING PANDEMIC AND CRISIS PERIODS. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7(3), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-3-97-108
Article views: 348 | PDF Downloads: 173

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

international (equity) portfolio liabilities, risk, return, risk/return tradeoff, increased volatility, developed markets, emerging markets, frontier markets, COVID crisis

References

Androkopoulos, A., Angelidis, T., & Skintzi, V. (2014). Illiquidity, Return and Risk in G7 Stock Markets: Interdependencies and Spillovers. International Review of Financial Analysis, 35 (3), 118–127.

Ang, A., & Bekaert, G. (2002). International Asset Allocation with Regime Shifts. The Review of Financial Studies, 15 (4), 1137–1187.

Arnott, R. D., & Bernstein, R. L. (2002). What Risk Premium Is Normal? Financial Analysts Journal, 58 (2), 64–85.

Aslanidis, N., Christiansen, C., & Savva, C. (2016). Risk-return Trade-off for European Stock Markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 46 (3), 84–103.

Bai, Y., & Green, C. (2020). Country and Industry Factors in Tests of Capital Asset Pricing Models for Partially Integrated Emerging Markets. Economic Modelling, 92 (3), 180–194.

Bekaert, G., Erb, C., Harvey, C., & Viskanta, T. (1998). Distributional Characteristics of Emerging Market Returns and Asset Allocation. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 24 (3), 102–116.

Best, M. J., & Grauer, R. R. (1991). On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results. The Review of Financial Studies, 4 (2), 315–342.

Black, F. S. (1972). Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing. The Journal of Business, 45 (3), 444–455.

Black, F., & Litterman, R. (1992). Global Portfolio Optimization. Financial Analysts Journal, 48 (5), 28–43.

Butler, K., & Joaquin, D. (2002). Are the Gains from International Portfolio Diversification exaggerated? The Influence of Downside Risk in Bear Markets. Journal of International Money & Finance, 21 (7), 981–1011.

Cavaglia, S, Brightman, C., & Aked, M. (2000). The Increasing Importance of Industry Factors. Financial Analysts Journal, 56 (5), 41–54.

Cheng, A., & Jahan-Parvar, M. (2014). Risk-Return Trade-Off in the Pacific Basin Equity Markets. Emerging Markets Review, 18 (3), 123–140.

Donadelli, M., & Paradiso, A. (2014). Is There Heterogeneity in Financial Integration Dynamics? Evidence from Country and Industry Emerging Market Equity Indexes. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 32 (3), 184–218.

Dziuba, P. (2017). Asymmetry in Risk and Return Fluctuations as a Factor Driving International Portfolio Investments in Crisis Periods. European Cooperation: Scientific Approaches and Applied Technologies, 1 (2), 23–34.

Grubel, H. G. (1968). Internationally Diversified Portfolios: Welfare Gains and Capital Flows. The American Economic Review, 58 (5), 1299–1314.

Hossein, A., & Nossman, M. (2011). Risk Contagion among International Stock Markets. Journal of International Money & Finance, 30 (1), 22–38.

IMF (2021). Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey. International Monetary Fund. Available at: https://data.imf.org/?sk=B981B4E3-4E58-467E-9B90-9DE0C3367363.

IMF (2021). IMF Data. Interest Rates Selected Indicators (T-Bills). International Monetary Fund. Available at: https://data.imf.org/regular.aspx?key=61545855.

Jobson, J. D. (1991). Confidence Regions for the Mean-Variance Efficient Set: An Alternative Approach to Estimation Risk. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1 (3), 235–257.

Jorion, P. (1992). Portfolio Optimization in Practice. Financial Analysts Journal, 4 (2), 315–342.

Karolyi, G., & Stulz, R. (1996). Why Do Markets Move Together? An Investigation of U.S.-Japan Stock Return Comovements. The Journal of Finance, 51 (3), 951–986.

Kim, W., Fabozzi, F., Cheridito, P., & Fox, C. (2014). Controlling Portfolio Skewness and Kurtosis without Directly Optimizing Third and Fourth Moments. Economic Letters, 122 (2), 154–158.

Lehar, A. (2005). Measuring Systemic Risk: A Risk Management Approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29 (10), 2577–2603.

Lessard, D. (1976). World, Country and Industry Relationships in Equity Returns: Implications for Risk Reduction through International Diversification. Financial Analysts Journal, 32 (3), 32–38.

Lintner, J. V. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47 (1), 13–37.

Longin, F., & Solnik, B. (2001). Extreme Correlations of International Equity Markets. The Journal of Finance, 56 (2), 649–676.

Longin, F., & Solnik, B. (1995). Is the Correlation in International Equity Returns Constant: 1960-1990? Journal of International Money and Finance, 14 (1), 3–26.

Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7 (1), 77–91.

Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd.; Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University.

Mei, D., Liu, J., Ma, F., & Chen, W. (2017). Forecasting Stock Market Volatility: Do Realized Skewness and Kurtosis Help? Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 481 (1), 153–159.

Merton, R. C. (1973). An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model. Econometrica, 41 (5), 867–887.

Moerman, G. (2008). Diversification in Euro Area Stock Markets: Country versus Industry. Journal of International Money and Finance, 27 (7), 1122–1134.

Morana, C., & Beltratti, A. (2002). The Effects of the Introduction of the Euro on the Volatility of European Stock Markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26 (10), 2047–2064.

MSCI (2021). MSCI Indexes Performance. End of Day Index Data Search. Morgan Stanley Capital International. Available at: https://www.msci.com/end-of-day-data-search.

Niklewski, J., & Rodgers, T. (2013). International Portfolio Diversification and the 2007 Financial Crisis. In J. Batten, P. MacKay & N. Wagner (Eds.), Advances in Financial Risk Management (pp. 225–252). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rogach, O. I., & Dziuba, P. V. (2017). Exchange Rate Risks of International Portfolio Investments: Comparative Analysis of Ukrainian and other Frontier Markets. Transition Studies Review, 24 (1), 31–45.

Rogach, O., Shnyrkov, O., & Dziuba, P. (2019). Skewness-Based Portfolio Selection: Implications for International Investing in Frontier Markets. Transition Studies Review, 26 (2), 23–38.

Sharpe, W. F. (1972). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, 19 (3), 425–442.

Solnik, B. H. (1974). Why Not Diversify Internationally Rather than Domestically? Financial Analysts Journal, 30 (4), 48–54.

Umantsiv, I., Lebedeva, L., & Mytrofanova, A. (2019). Modern Trends in Governance of State Ownership Relations. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5 (5), 155–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-155-164

Wang, Z., & Khan, M. (2017). Market States and the Risk-return Tradeoff. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 65 (3), 314–327.

WFE (2021). Statistics Portal. World Federation of Exchanges. Available at: https://www.world-exchanges.org/our-work/statistics.

Yakubovskiy, S., Rodionova, T., & Kyfak, A. (2019). Inflow of Foreign Capital as a Factor of the Development of Current Accounts of the Eastern European Countries. Transition Studies Review, 26 (2), 3–14.

Zaremba, A., & Umutlu, M. (2018). Size Matters Everywhere: Decomposing the Small Country and Small Industry Premia. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 43 (3), 1–18.