GEOECONOMICS AS A TOOL OF MODERN GEOSTRATEGY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The scholarly article presents different analytical approaches to modern understanding and manifestation forms of geoeconomics as a tool of geostrategy. It contains a comprehensive list of conceptual tools, empirical roots, and case studies on the political-economic essence of geoeconomics. The paper’s particular contribution is its direct connection with the practice and rooting of international political economy and poorly studied determination of geoeconomics with geostrategy in the evolving structure of the global world order and new vectors of geoeconomic dynamics of Ukraine. Based on the evolutionary method, the author has developed a matrix of approaches to understanding geoeconomics, demonstrated its progress, conducted a critical analysis of each of them, and put forward an original version and model of interpreting the relevant dynamic phenomenon following the strategic national interests of Ukraine. The myth of static assumptions about the existence of geoeconomics as a self-sufficient system that should have replaced geopolitics was debunked. Using the case study method, the key factors facilitating the geoeconomic expansion of China, the USA, and Russia are highlighted. Emphasis is placed on the role of other states in the formation of geoeconomics, and the issue of strategic autonomy is elucidated. The author justifies the genuine interest in geoeconomics as a component of geostrategy, demonstrates its determination, and specifies the main modern tools of geoeconomics. The impact of the military discourse on geoeconomics is proven, and the vectors of geoeconomic de-sovereignization of some countries in the context of economic globalization, geosecurity expansion, and the growing role of services in the GDP structure. The importance of studying the role of artificial intelligence, android robots and humanoids in GDP formation was separately emphasized; options of their influence on the world’s geoeconomics and the development of humanity as a whole amidst neo-economics are modeled.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
geoeconomics, geostrategy of modern Ukrainian State, neoliberal globalization, geoeconomic security, neoclassical economics, economic ideology, economic transformations, strategic autonomy, geoeconomic development, post-neoliberal
Aggarwal, V.K., & Reddie, A.W. (2021). Economic statecraft in the 21st century: Implications for the future of the global trade regime. World Trade Review, 20(2), 137–151.
AI-powered 'boss', staff getting along thanks to HK-listed enterprise. Available at: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202212/13/WS6397dee7a31057c47eba419f.html
Babi´c, M. (2021). State capital in a geoeconomic world: Mapping state-led foreign investment in the global political economy. Review of International Political Economy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2021.1993301
Babić, M., Dixon, A.D., & Liu, I.T. (2022). "Geoeconomics in a Changing Global Order". In: Babić, M., Dixon, A.D., Liu, I.T. (eds) The Political Economy of Geoeconomics: Europe in a Changing World. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01968-5_1
Billionaire Jack Ma will lose control of Ant Group. Available at: https://root-nation.com/ua/news-ua/it-news-ua/ua-milyarder-dzhek-ma-vtrativ-kontrol-nad-ant-group/
Blackwill, Robert D., & Harris, Jennifer (2016). War By Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft (1 ed.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Edward N. Luttwak (1990). From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce. The National Interest №. 20 (Summer 1990), pp. 17–23. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42894676
Edward N. Luttwak (1999). Turbo-capitalism : winners and losers in the global economy (1st U.S. ed.). New York: HarperCollinsPublishers.
Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79.
Gasimli, Vusal (2015). Geo-economics. Baku: Center for Strategic Studies. 208 p.
Gertz, G., & Evers, M.M. (2020). Geoeconomic competition: Will state capitalism win? The Washington Quarterly, 43(2), 117–136.
Joachim Klement (2021). GEO-ECONOMICS "The Interplay between Geopolitics, Economics, and Investments". CFA Institute Research Foundation. 320 p. Available at: https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/research/foundation/2021/geo-economics
Kanai, J.M., & Schindler, S. (2019). Peri-urban promises of connectivity: Linking project-led polycentrism to the infrastructure scramble. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(2), 302–322.
Kashchuk D. Gold mineral resources of Ukraine. How to attract investors to the Ukrainian gold and rare earth mining market. Available at: https://www.epravda.com.ua/rus/columns/2020/06/23/662171/
Kolodyazhnyy, A., Auyezov, O., & Louise, H. (2021, July 23). Rosatom, DP world to join efforts on arctic container shipments. Reuters. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/rosatom-dp-world-join-efforts-arctic-container-shi pments-2021-07-23/
Lipkan V.A., & Zubko G.Yu. (2022). Strategy of the state infrastructure policy of Ukraine: [monograph] ; according to the general edition of V.A. Lipkan. Kyiv: Lipkan V.A., 1008 p.
Lipkan, V.A. (2003). Safety science: Study guide. Kyiv: Publishing House of the European University, 208 p.
Lipkan, V.A. (2022). Geostrategy of the modern Ukrainian state: principles of formation. Bulletin of Lviv University. Series of philosophical and political studies, 42, 268–277. Available at: http://fps-visnyk.lnu.lviv.ua/archive/42_2022/35.pdf
Lipkan, V.A. (2022). Regarding the need to create a geostrategic discourse. Politicus, 3, 34–41. Available at: http://politicus.od.ua/3_2022/5.pdf
Lipkan, V.A. (2022). The theory of geostrategy: a discursive analysis. KELM (Knowledge, Education, Law, Management), 4(48), 217–228. Available at: http://kelmczasopisma.com/ua/viewpdf/9001
Lipkan, V.A. Reason for humanism. Available at: https://www.lipkan.com/privid-gumanizmu/
Liu, I.T., & Dixon, A.D. (2021). Legitimating state capital: The global financial professions and the transnationalization of Chinese sovereign wealth. Development and Change, 52(5), 1251–1273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12681
Luttwak, E.N. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest, 20, 17–23.
Luttwak, Edward N. (1999). "Theory and Practice of Geo-Economics" from Turbo-Capitalism: Winners and Losers in the Global Economy. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Marianne Schneider-Petsinger Geoeconomics explained. Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2016/12/geoeconomics-explained
Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. "Geo-economics". Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 9 August 2020. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/geo-economics
Meunier, S., & Nicolaidis, K. (2019). The geopoliticization of European trade and investment policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57 (S1), 103–113.
Mikael Wigell, Antto Vihma Geopolitics versus geoeconomics: the case of Russia's geostrategy and its effects on the EU. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs). Vol. 92, No. 3 (May 2016), pp. 605–627. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24757627
Milan Babi´c, Adam D. Dixon, Imogen T. Liu (2022) The Political Economy of Geoeconomics: Europe in a Changing World. Available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-01968-5
Milan Babic, Adam Dixon A New Age of Ambition: Geoeconomics and Geopolitical Competition in the Globalised World Economy. Available at: https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/SectionDetails/1140
Moisio, S. (2019). Re-thinking geoeconomics: Towards a political geography of economic geographies. Geography Compass, 13(10), e12466.
Nixon, Richard (January 15, 1992). "Seize the Moment: America's Challenge in a One-superpower World" (First ed.). Simon & Schuster. p. 23.
Played in the meta universe: Mark Zuckerberg lost 70 billion dollars. Available at: https://mediasat.info/uk/2022/09/23/zukerberg-vtrativ-70-mlrd-dollll/
Robert D. Kaplan, WSJ, 26 Aug. 2022.
Singer, J. David (October 1961). "The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations". World Politics. Cambridge University Press. 14 (1): 77–92.
The Pentagon's chief military programmer: the US lost the AI war to China. Available at: https://root-nation.com/ua/news-ua/it-news-ua/ua-usa-china-ai/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.