VICTIM OF AN OFFENCE: LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS IN AN INTERJURISDICTIONAL CONTEXT
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The paper addresses some criminal law and criminological issues related to the status and rights of crime victims. The study provides a comparative examination of the legal frameworks for crime victims in Ukraine, the United States and the European Union. It highlights significant differences in the definition of victim in Ukrainian criminal law and procedure, while discussing broader victim protection mechanisms in the American and European contexts. The subject of the study is an economic and legal analysis of the status of a crime victim in different jurisdictions. The chosen research methodology is based on the methods of systematic analysis, comparison and interdisciplinary (legal/economic) research. The purpose of this article is to propose, on the basis of a comprehensive analysis, some new approaches to understanding the concept of a crime victim in several world jurisdictions. The study draws conclusions of both theoretical and practical importance regarding the economic and legal status of crime victims at national and international levels. It is noted that, while the median economic losses from crimes are generally modest, crimes with significant financial impacts are rare but disproportionately covered in the media. The study places particular emphasis on the economic impact of crimes on victims and society as a whole. In addition to direct costs such as medical expenses, it also analyses indirect consequences including psychological trauma. The study furthermore includes an evaluation of restorative justice frameworks and victim compensation policies within the economic analyses of law framework. Moreover, the study underscores the pivotal role of international legal instruments, such as the EU's Directive 2012/29/EU and the International Criminal Court's provisions, in promoting universal enhancement of victims' rights. The authors advocate for further comparative research to harmonise national and international approaches to victim protection. It has been established that American federal law also recognises a special status of crime victims and contains a comprehensive legal protection framework to bring them justice. In comparison, the European model of protecting crime victims, as discussed in the paper, has been developed even further. It includes both legal mechanisms to protect victims within the EU and to monitor the progress of such protection at the international level. It has been demonstrated that the International Criminal Court (ICC) places significant emphasis on issues pertaining to victims by establishing a comprehensive procedural framework aimed at recognising and safeguarding the rights of victims subjected to various international crimes within the purview of the Court's jurisdiction.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
criminal offence, victim, economic analysis of law, civil servant, law enforcement agencies, criminal damage
U.S. Code § 1512 – Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. FindLaw.com. Available at: https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-1512/
U.S. Code § 1513 – Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant. Justia. Available at: https://law.justia.com/codes/us/1994/title18/parti/chap73/sec1513
U.S. Code § 3771 – Crime victims’ rights. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3771
Borovyk, A., Tkachenko, I., Derevyanko, N., & Diakin, Y. (2023). Public Official as a Victim of Criminal Insult and Defamation: Comparative Research. Cuestiones Políticas, Vol. 41(78), p. 739–758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4178.50
Buchholz, K. (2024). Hate Crime Victims Most Often Targeted for Race or Ethnicity. Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/chart/29486/us-hate-crime-by-bias-type/
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. EU Strategy on victims’ rights (2020-2025). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0258
The Criminal Code of Ukraine (2001). The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada, 2001, No. 25–26, Art. 131. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14?lang=en#Text
Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA (2012). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:315:0057:0073:EN:PDF
EU Adopts Victims’ Strategy for the First Time (2020). Leuven Institute of Criminology. Available at: https://www.law.kuleuven.be/linc/english/research/RL4/news/eu-adopts-victims-strategy-for-the-first-time
Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loyaza, N. (2000). Crime and Victimization: An Economic Perspective. ECONOMIA, Vol. 1(1), p. 219–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.2000.0004
Golovkin, B. M. (2015). Victimhood as the main category of victimology. Journal of Eastern European Law, Vol. 20, p. 6–13. Available at: http://easternlaw.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/golovkin_20.pdf
Greer, C. (2017). ‘News Media, Victims and Crime’, in P. Davies, P. Francis, C. Greer (eds.) Victims, Crime and Society, second edition, London: Sage.
Jousten, M. (1987). Role of the Victim of Crime in European Criminal Justice Systems – A Crossnational Study of the Role of the Victim. Helsinki Institute of Crime Prevention and Control Affiliated with the United Nations. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/105139NCJRS.pdf
Kamensky, D., Dudorov, O., Savchenko, A., Movchan, R., & Danylevska, Y. (2023). Criminal liability for humanitarian aid embezzlement during war: The case of Ukraine: Cuestiones Políticas, Vol. 41(77), p. 760–776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.50
Lazebnyi, L. (2022). An attack on the life of a law enforcement officer is considered completed from the moment of the attempt, regardless of the occurrence of any consequences. LexInform. Available at: https://lexinform.com.ua/sudova-praktyka/posyagannya-na-zhyttya-pratsivnyka-pravoohoronnogo-organu-vvazhayetsya-zakinchenym-iz-momentu-vchynennya-zamahu-nezalezhno-vid-nastannya-bud-yakyh-naslidkiv/
Lutsenko, Y., Motyl, V., Tarasiuk, A., Areshonkov, V., Diakin, Y., & Kamensky, D. (2023). Globalization of White-Collar Crime: Far and Beyond National Jurisdictions. Political Questions, Vol. 41(76), p. 64–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4176.03
Movchan, R., Vozniuk, A., Kamensky, D., Koval, I., & Golovko, O. (2022). Criminal and legal protection of land resources in Ukraine and Latin America: comparative legal analysis. Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 11(51), p. 328–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.51.03.33
Novokmet, A. (2016). The Right of a Victim to a Review of a Decision not to Prosecute as Set out in Article 11 of Directive 2012/29/EU and an Assessment of its Transposition in Germany, Italy, France and Croatia. Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 12 (1), p. 86–108. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.330
Olásolo, H., & Kiss, A. (2010). The role of victims in criminal proceedings before the International Criminal Court. Revue internationale de droit pénal, Vol. 81, p. 125–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.811.0125
Orth, U. (2002). Secondary Victimization of Crime Victims by Criminal Proceedings. Social Justice Research, Vol. 15, p. 313–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021210323461
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA (2012). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2020:188:FIN
Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2024). International Criminal Court. Available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RulesProcedureEvidenceEng.pdf
Skogan, W. G. (1987). The impact of victimization on fear. Crime and Delinquency. Vol. 33, p. 135–154.
Sullivan, J., & Kamensky, D. (2024). Putin’s power play: Russia’s attacks on Ukraine’s electric power infrastructure violate international law. The Electricity Journal, Vol. 37 (2), 107371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2024.107371
Tkachenko I. M. (2022). The victim in criminal and criminal procedural legislation: current issues of theory and practice. Kyiv Journal of Law, Vol. 4, p. 185–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/klj/2022.4.28
Vozniuk, A., Kamensky, D., Dudorov, O., Movchan, R., & Andrushko, A. (2021). Unconstitutionality of criminal liability for filing inaccurate information in Ukraine: critical legal analyses. Questiones Politicas, Vol. 69(39), p. 133–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.07
Wallace, H. (1993). Victims of Crimes: Reporting, Identification and Values. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 84(3), p. 669–677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1143967
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.