TOOLS OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS: A POSTCOLONIAL APPROACH

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 30, 2024

  Eldar Veremchuk

  Hennadii Vasylchuk

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify the communicative tools used in the postcolonial world for intercultural communication and to outline the potential for their practical implementation. The objectives of the present investigation are as follows: firstly, to highlight the tools used in international communication within business discourse; secondly, to identify the ways in which these tools can be tailored for postcolonial communication practices; thirdly, to provide positive and negative examples of their use and to offer recommendations for their better implementation; and fourthly, to establish how business communication practices, such as branding and advertising, can benefit the revival of the national idea and cultural heritage while unifying the nation ideologically. The object of the study is intercultural communication in the postcolonial space, and the subject is the peculiarities of communication tools. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that, despite the existence of many works dedicated to various aspects of intercultural communication, there are no works that establish and classify the exact tools that can be used to promote the national identity of the former colonies in the intercultural business communication. The aforementioned tools encompass branding, marketing, PR and publicity. Furthermore, the article undertakes an examination of the manner in which these instruments can be employed not solely within the context of business communicative discourse but also as a means of constructing and reinforcing a national concept and cultural unity. The methodology of the research relied on the following methods: firstly, the method of continuous sampling, which was employed to select language communicative contexts for analysis; secondly, the method of semantic and pragmatic analysis, which was used to identify the meaning of language units used in intercultural communication and their impact on the recipient; and thirdly, the method of interpretative analysis of text from the advertising discourse, which was used to find the hidden meanings and implications in marketing messages. The study established that branding, when employed as a tool in the context of intercultural postcolonial communication, can be either regressive or progressive. While the former seeks to disguise the colonial influence on business, the progressive branding strategy seeks to promote national and cultural identity by using nationally themed brand names, deleting colonial semantics in naming, and emphasising uniqueness and identity through the use of cultural symbols and motifs. Postcolonial advertising should be tailored to each target market and can be used not only for business purposes but also to promote a national idea. The public relations and publicity tools encompass the endorsement of products by figures from the local culture, as well as the utilisation of an accurate decolonised language of reference. This underscores the equality and autonomy of the formerly colonised culture. The findings can be employed by business practices engaged in intercultural communication in postcolonial contexts, as well as by theorists who study the manner in which decolonised societies live and develop.

How to Cite

Veremchuk, E., & Vasylchuk, H. (2024). TOOLS OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS: A POSTCOLONIAL APPROACH. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 10(5), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-5-146-154
Article views: 36 | PDF Downloads: 27

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

advertising, cultural heritage, decolonisation, public relations, publicity

References

Vintage Ads That Would Be Banned Today. Available at: https://www.boredpanda.com/vintage-ads/

American Marketing Association. Available at: https://www.ama.org/topics/branding/

Anwer, A. (2016). Transnational Public Relations in Postcolonial Spaces: Making Space for other Discourses in the Afghan Public Sphere (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/90

Backmann, J., & Kanitz, R., & Tian, A.W., & Hoffmann, P., & Hoegl, M. (2020). Cultural gap bridging in multinational teams. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 51, p. 1283–1311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00310-4

Barker, R. T., & Gower, K. (2010). Strategic application of storytelling in organizations: Toward effective communication in a diverse world. The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 47(3), p. 295–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610369782

Bovee, C. L., & Thill, J. V. (2010). Business communication today (10th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.

Bowling, C. (2019). General Motors apologizes after Chevrolet ad includes Chinese, Japanese racist stereotypes. Daily News. Available at: https://www.nydailynews.com/2013/05/01/general-motors-apologizes-after-chevrolet-ad-includes-chinese-japanese-racist-stereotypes/

Braslauskas, J. (2020). Effective creative intercultural communication in the context of business interaction: theoretical and practical aspects. Creativity Studies, Vol. 13(1), p. 199–215.

Chaney, L. H., & Martin, J. S. (2007). Intercultural business communication (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Debord, G. (1995). The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone books.

Decolonizing media and public relations. Available at: https://pipikwanpehtakwan.com/2024/decolonizing-the-media-and-public-relations-1394.

Demir, C. (2019). Review of linguistic pragmatics of intercultural professional and business communication. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 5, p. 537–541.

Devjak, I., & Sabidussi, A., & Bezcioğlu-Göktolga, İ., & Smeets, R. (2023). Intercultural Communication: Hampering and Facilitating Factors in International Business. Journal of Intercultural Management, Vol. 15, p. 21–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2023-0006

Dirlik, A. (2002). Rethinking Colonialism: Globalization, Postcolonialism, and the Nation. Interventions, Vol. 4(3), p. 428–448.

Eckhardt, G., & Belk, R., & Bradford, T., & Dobscha, S., & Ger, G., & Varman, R. (2021). Decolonizing marketing. Consumption Markets & Culture, Vol. 25, p. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2021.1996734

Forbes. Available at: https://forbes.ua/ru/ratings/200-lideriv-ukrainskoi-ekonomiki-08112023-17066

Francis, J. N. P. (1991). When in Rome? The effects of cultural adaptation on intercultural business negotiations. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 22(3), p. 403–428.

Hiebing, R. G., Scott W. C. (1997). The Successful Marketing Plan: A Disciplined and Comprehensive Approach (2nd ed.). Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.

Hinner, M. B., & Rülke, T. (2002). Intercultural communication in business ventures illustrated by two case studies. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48376

Hofstede, G. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill USA.

Jones, C. W. (2015). Ads send out more than the clients’ message. Available at: https://medium.com/hacker-maker-teacher-thief/ads-send-out-more-than-the-clients-message-d92d368c69e1

Jones, C. W. (2018). Racism and Classism in Mexican Advertising. In Olteanu, A., Stables, A., Borţun, D. (eds) Meanings & Co. Humanities – Arts and Humanities in Progress. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91986-7_13

Jones, C. W. (2022). Decolonising Advertising through content creation, broadcast on social media, to inspire social transformation. Available at: https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/2022/12/02/5074/5074

Kaneva, N. (2022). With ‘bravery’ as its new brand, Ukraine is turning advertising into a weapon of war. The World. Available at: https://theworld.org/stories/2022/08/25/bravery-its-new-brand-ukraine-turning-advertising-weapon-war

Kim, M. S., & Sharkey, W. F. (1995). Independent and interdependent construals of self: Explaining cultural patterns of interpersonal communication in multi‐cultural organizational settings. Communication Quarterly, Vol. 43, p. 20–38.

Kotler, Ph., & Keller, K. L. (2015). Marketing Management. London: Pearson Education.

Maharramova, V. (2022). Characteristic features of intercultural communication. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, Vol. 54(5), p. 56–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23856/5407

Mogea, T. (2023). Cross-Cultural Communication Barriers in Organizations. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa Dan Pendidikan, Vol. 3(2), p. 20–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/cendikia.v3i2.951

O'Rourke, IV, J. S. (2010). Management Communication (4th ed., pp. 280-289). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Okoro, E. (2013). International organizations and operations: An analysis of cross-cultural communication effectiveness and management orientation. Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), Vol. 1, p. 1–7.

Okoro, E. A., & Washington, M. C. (2012). Workforce diversity and organizational communication: Analysis of human capital performance and productivity. Journal of Diversity Management (JDM), Vol. 7(1), p. 57–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/jdm.v7i1.6936

Platova, E. D. (2020). Strategies and Tactics of Business Interaction in Orenburg Region. In Proceedings of the Philological Readings (PhR 2019) (pp. 342–349).

Tocar, S. (2024). A synthesis of the determinants of successful intercultural communication in organisations. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 10(3), p. 42–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-3-42-57

Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, Vol. 1, p. 1–40.

Ukrainian Institute. Decolonization. Selected articles published in the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Available at: https://ui.org.ua/en/sectors-en/decolonization-selected-articles-published-in-the-aftermath-of-russias-invasion-of-ukraine/

Varner, I. I. (2000). The Theoretical Foundation for Intercultural Business Communication: A Conceptual Model. The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 37(1), p. 39–57.

Wang, G. F., & Hu, X. (2022). Research on Intercultural Communication in International Business. Open Access Library Journal, Vol. 9, p. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109064

Washington, M., & Okoro, E., & Thomas, O. (2012). Intercultural Communication In Global Business: An Analysis Of Benefits And Challenges. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), Vol. 11, p. 217–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v11i2.6776

Wilson, T. F. (2024). On Decolonization and its Correlates. Anuário Antropológico, Vol. 49, p. 66–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/aa.11832

Yevtushenko, N., & Gudz, O. (2022). Consulting and internal communications: theoretical and methodological aspect. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 8(1), p. 43–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-1-43-54

Zelenskyy, V. Being brave is our brand; we will spread our courage in the world. President of Ukraine. Available at: https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/buti-smilivimi-ce-nash-brend-budemo-poshiryuvati-nashu-smili-74165