CIVIL ENGAGEMENT VS. PARTY PARTICIPATION: NEW FORMS OF POLITICAL INTERACTION OF UKRAINIANS (SURVEY OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS)

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Jun 25, 2025

  Denys Yakovlev

  Hanna Trushevych

  Olha Diachenko

Abstract

The Russian-Ukrainian war has been ongoing since 2014. The full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 resulted in profound changes to the global security, economic, social and humanitarian landscape. Additionally, it induced substantial transformations in the political life, political and economic activity, and the political reality of Ukraine. One of the most challenging issues for Ukrainian society and its authorities has been the emergence of a new social category of citizens: internally displaced persons (IDPs). They are transforming the economic landscape of certain regions by investing in real estate, securing employment and creating jobs as entrepreneurs, producing goods and providing services. IDPs have become an important part of community resilience. As members of the middle class, they are active citizens. The objective of the present article is to ascertain the most optimal and desirable forms of political participation, as perceived by IDPs themselves. The results of the qualitative study demonstrate a shift in the focus of IDP political participation, from party involvement to public activity (and potentially vice versa), signifying a novel form of political interaction between IDPs and public authorities, wherein IDPs present their own interests in public spaces. The authors conducted 201 individual face-to-face interviews with internally displaced persons from temporarily occupied regions of Ukraine and the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, who had relocated to the Odesa, Vinnytsia and Kirovohrad oblasts. The findings of the study indicate a decline in the interest of IDPs in conventional political parties, accompanied by an increase in their engagement with civic initiatives and volunteering. A mere 3% of respondents indicated their intention to become party members in the near future, while a significant majority (69.2%) sought to demonstrate their activity in the public sector. This phenomenon suggests the emergence of a novel model of political participation in Ukraine, wherein civic engagement, as opposed to the influence of oligarchic parties (vertically organized leadership-type parties financed by monopolies), serves as the primary form of influence on socio-political processes. In this context, the question arises of whether civic activity and self-organization will be able to transform the oligarchic party system or if they will become its complement. The present study seeks to explore the influence of IDPs as a catalyst for civic mobilisation and economic sustainability of communities through the volunteer movement, self-organisation in communities, and rear unit leadership. It is argued that IDPs act as important "agents of influence" in this process. The potential of the public sector as an alternative to traditional party politics is indicated. It is also noteworthy that 27.9% of respondents expressed disinterest in both politics and civic activities. Concurrently, an augmentation in the number of public initiatives and projects implemented by IDPs has been documented.

How to Cite

Yakovlev, D., Trushevych, H., & Diachenko, O. (2025). CIVIL ENGAGEMENT VS. PARTY PARTICIPATION: NEW FORMS OF POLITICAL INTERACTION OF UKRAINIANS (SURVEY OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS). Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(2), 338-345. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-2-338-345
Article views: 76 | PDF Downloads: 47

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

internally displaced persons, politics, democracy, civic activism, party participation, elections, Russian-Ukrainian war, volunteering, middle class, economic adaptation of IDPs

References

Bang, H. P., & Sørensen, E. (2001). The everyday maker: A new challenge to democratic governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 23(3), 325–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2001.11029320

Bazylyuk Y., Vlasenko R., &Vlasiuk O. et al. (2025). Economic Security of Ukraine in the Context of High Military Risks and Global Instability : an analytical report. Kyiv: NISS, 104 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53679/NISS-analytrep.2025.03

Betts, A., & Collier, P. (2017). Refuge: Transforming a broken refugee system. Penguin Random House.

Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge University Press.

Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x

Durnyeva, T., Jepsen, H.H., & Roberts, H. (2019). IDPs’ Electoral Participation Gap. Journal of Internal Displacement, 9(1), 5–35.

Krakhmalova, К. (2019). Internally Displaced Persons in Pursuit for Access to Justice: Ukraine. International migration, 57 (5), 309–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12500

Kroytor, A., & Yakovlev, D. (2020). Post-election situation in Ukraine: changing faces or ideological transformations. Contemporary issues of the world community and the role of social sciences in ensuring its development, 1–29.

Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 757–769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648

Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. Palgrave Macmillan.

Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge University Press.

Tormey, S. (2015). The end of representative politics. Polity Press.

Trushevych, H. (2021). The role of language image in creating a faborable image of Ukrainian politicians: analysis of New Year’s speeches of the Presidents. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, 4, 113–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2021-4-14

Trushevych, H. (2022). Volodymyr Zelenskyi’s political image during the Russian-Ukrainian war: an initial analysis. Reality of Politics. Estimates – Comments – Forecasts, (4)22, 81–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/rop2022406

Ukrainian Refugee Crisis: The Current Situation. (2025, February 14). People in Need. Available at: https://www.peopleinneed.net/the-ukrainian-refugee-crisis-current-situation-9539gp

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.

Woroniecka-Krzyzanowska, D., & Palaguta, N. (2017). Internally Displaced Persons and Elections under Military Conflict in Ukraine. Journal of Refugee Studies, 30 (1), 27–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/few021

Yakovlev D. (2015). Democracy “On the March”: Rethinking the Role of Propaganda and the “Party of Power” under Armed Threat. Proceedings of the Scope: science of politics – International Interdisciplinary Conference of Political Research (Bucharest, May 8-9, 2015), University of Bucharest.

Yakovlev, D., & Trushevych, H. (2024). The image of the President of Ukraine during the war: the view of the creative class. Consolidarea rezilienţei sociale prin valorificarea capitalului uman în contextul aderării Republicii Moldova şi Ucrainei la Uniunea Europeană (pp. 227–230). Chişinău: Editura USM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59295/crs2024.20

Yakovlev, D., & Yeremenko, O. (2020). Political discourse in a transitional society: between the Scylla of anarchy and the Charybdis of tyranny. The level of efficiency and the need for the influence of social sciences on the development of modern civilization : collective monograph (pp. 74–93). Lviv-Toruń: Liha-Pres.